Skip to main content

Attribution in Partnerschaften

  • Chapter
Sozialpsychologie der Partnerschaft

Zusammenfassung

Rabbit greift an seine Tasche, yod Schrecken packt ihn. Er hat den Schlüssel nicht. Alles, seine ganze Idee, hängt jetzt davon ab, ob und wie Janice wieder geschlampt hat. Entweder sie vergisst; ihm den Schlüssel zu geben, wenn er aus dem Haus geht, oder sie macht sich gar nicht erst die Mühe, ihn aus dem Zündschloss zu ziehen. Er versucht sich vorzustellen, was diesmal wahrscheinlicher ist, aber es gelingt nicht. So gut kennt er sie nicht. Er weiß nie im Voraus, was sie tut. Sie weiß es ja selber nicht. Sie ist eben dumm.« (John Updike, Hasenherz)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Andrews, B. & Brewin, C. R. (1990). Attributions of blame for marital violence: A study of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52,757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H. & Epstein, N. (1990). Cognitive-behavioral marital therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Daiuto, A. D., Carels, R. A., Rankin, L. A. & Burnett C. K. (1996). Cognitions in marriage: The relationship between standards and attri-butions. Journal of Family Psychology, 10,209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., Sayers, S. L & Duhe A (1989). Attributional style and attributional patterns among married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N. & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107,3–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N. & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63,613–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Arias, I. & Fincham, F. D. (1996). Linking marital and child attributions to family processes and parent-child relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 10,408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. C, Robins, C. & Johnson, M. K. (1983). Articulated thoughts during simulated situations: A paradigm for studying cognition in emotion and behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7,17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M., Lozy, J. L. & Saxon, S. (1993). Taking credit: Couples’ reports of contributions to child care. Journal of Family Issues, 14,421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, C. I., Barbour, K. A. & Davison, G. G. (1998). Articulated thoughts of maritally violent and nonviolent men during anger arousal. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66,259–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K. & Ströhm, W. (1995). Attributionsstrategien in unglücklichen Partnerschaften. In: Amelang, M., Ahrens, H.-J. & Bierhoff, H. W. (Hrsg.). Partnerwahl und Partnerschaft. Göttingen: Hogrefe, S 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D. & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The impact of attributions in marriage: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53,481–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D. & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The Relationship Attribution Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62,457–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Bradbury, T. N. & Grych, J. H. (1990). Conflict in close relationships: The role of intrapersonal phenomena. In: Graham, S. & Folkes, V. S. (eds.). Attribution theory: Applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp 161–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D. & O'Leary, K. D. (1983). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in martially distressed and nondistressed couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1,42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fthenakis, W. E., Kalicki, B. & Peitz G. (2002). Paare werden Eltern. Die Ergebnisse der LBS-Familien-Studie. Opladen: Leske u. Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107,64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horneffer, K. J. & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Construct of attributional style in depression and marital distress. Journal of Family Psychology, 9,186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol 2. San Diego: Academic Press, pp 219–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalicki, B. (2002). Entwicklung und Erprobung des Fragebogens zu Attributionen in Partnerschaften (FAP). Diagnostica, 48,37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In: Levine, D. (ed). Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol 15. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp 192–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31,457–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. L., Codym M. J. & Read, S. J. (eds.). (1992). Explaining one's self to others: Reason-giving in a social context. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E. & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Refining the association between attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 9,196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzer, J., Epstein, N. & Fleming, B. (1991). Marital Attitude Survey: A measure of dysfunctional attributions and expectancies. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 5,131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, B. (1994). Die Geburt des ersten Kindes—eine Herausforderung für die Partnerschaft. Bielefeld: Kleine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Measurement issues in marital research: A review and critique of contemporary survey instruments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50,891–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schänk, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K.G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weary, G., Stanley, M. A. & Harvey, J. H. (eds.). (1989). Attribution. New York: Springer-Verlag. Konflikt und Trennung

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalicki, B. (2003). Attribution in Partnerschaften. In: Grau, I., Bierhoff, HW. (eds) Sozialpsychologie der Partnerschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55590-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55590-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62748-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55590-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics