Skip to main content

Experiments with Preference Functions

  • Conference paper
Constructing and Applying Objective Functions

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 510))

  • 141 Accesses

Abstract

A survey is given of the author’s attempts to construct preference functions of Dutch political parties from direct interviews with their representations in Parliament. The role preference functions play in the theory of optimal economic policy is reviewed. The technique of transforming the interview results into preference functions is shown and the scope of the method to support policy statements is analyzed with special attention to the character of measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bellman, RICHARD (1957): Dynamic Programming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1958): The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, OLIVIER JEAN, and STANLEY FISCHER (1989): Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G.C. (1975): Analysis and Control of Dynamic Economic Systems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M.J. (1971): The Application of the Social Welfare Function to the Planning of Economic and Social Policy. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M.J. (1972A): “Optimal Policy Configurations under Alternative Community Group Preferences,” Kyklos, 4, 754–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M.J. (1972B): DO Political Parties Have Utility Functions. Societe Canadiene de Science Economique, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M.J., and W. Sellekaerts, (1974): “A Comparison of Optimal and Actual Policies for High Employment and Price Stability under External Inflation Conditions: the Canadien Experience,” The Southern Economic Journal, 41, 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida, RICHARD, JORDI Gali and MERK Gertler (1998): “Monetary policy rules in practice. Some international evidence,” European Economic Review, 1033–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1959): Theory of Value. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B.M. (1975): Economic Stabilization Policy: Methods in Optimization. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, RAGNAR (1949): “A Memorandum on Price-Wage-Tax-Subsidy Policies as Instruments in Maintaining Optimal Employment,” UN DOCUMENT, E/CN 1/Sub 2/13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, RAGNAR (1957): The Multiplex Method for Linear and Quadratic Planning. Economic Institute, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, RAGNAR (1976): “Cooperation between politicians and econometricians on the formalization of political preferences,” in: F. Long (Ed.) Economic Planning Studies. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 41–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, JOSEF (1997): “Introduction to the Third International Conference on Econometric Decision Models: Constructing Scalar-Valued Objective Functions,” in: A. Tangian and J. Gruber (Eds.) Constructing Scalar-Valued Objective Functions. Berlin: Springer, 3–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes HALLETT, A. (1991): “Public preferences and their role in the design of economic policy,” in: J. Gruber (Ed.) Econometric Decision Models. New Methods of Modeling and Applications, Proceedings Hagen, FRG 1989. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüsges, H., and J. Gruber (1991): “Least squares estimation of quadratic preference functions for econometric decision models based on survey data,” in: J. Gruber (Ed.) Econometric Decision Models. New Methods of Modeling and Applications, Proceedings Hagen, FRG 1989, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, H. (1983): “Het gedrag van de Nederlandse monétaire beleidsmakers:’ MAXIMIZING’ of’ SATISFICING’,” Research Memorandum 1983-21, Economische faculteit, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, L. (1974): “Establishing Preference Function for Macroeconomic Decision Models. (Some Observations on Ragnar Frisch’s Contributions),” European Economic Review, 5, 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakes, J.J. (2000): “De regel van Taylor en het monétaire beleid van het Eurosysteem,” MaandschrißEconomie, 64, 90–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kol, J. and P. De Wolff (1993): “Tinbergen’s Work: Change and Continuity,” De Economist, 141, 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunstman, A. (1978): Controlling a Linear Dynamic System according to asymmetric preferences. Working Paper Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F.E. and PRESCOTT, E.C. (1977) “Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 473–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M. (1973A): Selection of Models by Forecasting Intervals. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M. (1973B): Van prognoses naar programmas. Rede uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van gewoon hoogleraar in de wiskundige économie en de econometrie aan de Interfaculteit der Actuariele wetenschappen en Econometrie van de Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. op 13 april 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M. (1994): “The Scope of Inequality Coefficients,” in: W. Eichhorn (Ed.) Models of Welfare and Inequality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and O.J.C. Cornielje (1982): Decision Rule for Short Term Economic Policy derived from Aggregated Preferences of Political Parties. Onderzoekverslag 82, Interfaculteit der Actuariele Wetenschappen en Econometrie, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • merkies, a.h.q.m., and m.w. hofkes (1986): Preferences and possibilities in the dutch economy. onderzoekverslag 159, interfaculteit der actuariele wetenschappen en econometrie, vrije universiteit, amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and M.W. Hofkes (1991): “Operationalizing a macroeconomic preference function,” in: J. Gruber (Ed.) Econometric Decision Models, New Methods of Modeling and Applications, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Econometric Decision Models, University of Hagen, August 29-September 1, 1989, in Haus Nordhelle. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 366, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokyo. 205-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and T.E. Nijman (1980): Preference functions of Dutch political parties. Onderzoekverslag 50, Interfaculteit der Actuariele Wetenschappen en Econometrie, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Presented at the Econometric Conference 31-08-1980 Aix-en-Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and T.E. Nijman (1981A): “Preference functions of Dutch political parties,” Economie Appliqué, 34, 785–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and T.E. Nijman (1981B): “The measurement of quadratic preference functions with small samples,” Kwantitatieve methoden, 4, 142–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and T.E. NIJMAN (1983): “The measurement of quadratic preference functions with small samples,” in: J. Gruber (Ed.) Econometric Decision Models, Proceedings of a Conference at the University of Hagen, June 19-20, 1981. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 208, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 242–263.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and A.J. Vermaat (1977): Sociaal-Economische doelstellingsfuncties. Rapportage eerste verkennende enqute. Economische Faculteit, Interfaculteit der Actuariele Wetenschappen en Econometrie, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and A.J. Vermaat (1980): Preferentiefuncties van een aantal politieke partijen en maatschappelijke organisaties. Verslag van een enqute naar de rangschikking en onderlinge afweegverhoudingen tussen een aantal sociaal-economische grootheden. Onderzoekverslag 53, Interfaculteit der Actuariele Wetenschappen en Econometrie, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkies, A.H.Q.M., and A.J. Vermaat (1981): “De onmacht van een kabinet. Een empirisch onderzoek naar sociaal-economische preferentiefuncties en hun gebruik als welvaartsindicator,” Maandschrift Economie, 45, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijman, T.J. (1981): De Tweedegraads Spline Functie als Preferentiefunctie. Onderzoekverslag 72 Interfaculteit der Actuariele Wetenschappen en Econometrie, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, P.S. (1973): Optimal Planning for Economic Stabilization. The Application of Control Theory to Stabilization Policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, G.L. (1964): “The objectives of Canadian monetary policy, 1949-61. Empirical’ Trade-offs’ and the reaction function of the authorities,” The Journal of Political Economy, 72, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1952): “A behavioral model of rational choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1957): Models of Man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1950): “The development of utility theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 58, 307–327 and 373-396, reprinted in: A. N. Page (Ed.) (1968): Utility Theory: A book of readings. New York, London and Sydney, 55-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangian, A. (1997): “Methodological Remarks on Objective Functions,” in: Tangian, A., and J. Gruber (Ed.) Constructing Scalar-Valued Objective Functions. Berlin: Springer, 9–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tangian, A., and J. GRUBER (EDS.) (1997): Constructing Scalar-Valued Objective Functions, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 453. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangian, A., and J. Gruber (1997): “Constructing Quadratic and Polynomial Objective Functions,” in: A. Tangian and J. Gruber (Ed.) Constructing Scalar-Valued Objective Functions. Berlin: Springer, 166–194.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, HENRI (1964): Optimal Decision Rules for Government and Industry. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, HENRI (1971): Principles of Econometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. and A.S. Goldberger (1961): “On Pure and Mixed Statistical Estimation in Economics,” International Economic Review, 2, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Jan (1956): Economic Policy Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1985): “Measurability of Utility (or Welfare),” De Economist, 133, 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van DAAL, J., and MERKIES, A.H.Q.M., (1981): Collective Choice and Macro Economic Policy, Onderzoekverslag 69 Interfaculteit der Actuariele Wetenschappen en Econometrie, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van DAAL, J., and MERKIES, A.H.Q.M., (1984): Aggregation in Economic Research, From Individual to Macro Relations. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van DEN DOEL, J. (1975): Démocratie en welvaartstheorie, een inleiding in de nieuwe politieke économie. Alphen an de Rijn: Samson Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Geest, L. (1976): Het vastleggen van Economisch-Politieke Oordelen in Preferentiefuncties. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Van DER GEEST, L. (1977): “Het vastleggen van Economisch-Politieke Oordelen in Preferentiefuncties,” Economisch Statistische Berichten, 994–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van EIJK, C.J., and J. Sandee, (1959): “Quantitative Determination of an Optimum Economic Policy,” Econometrica, 27, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van PRAAG, B.M.S. (1968): Individual Welfare Functions and Consumer Behavior, A Theory of Rational Irrationality. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van PRAAG, B.M.S. (1971): “The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium. An Empirical Investigation,” European Economic Review, Spring, 337–369.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Merkies, A.H.Q.M. (2002). Experiments with Preference Functions. In: Tangian, A.S., Gruber, J. (eds) Constructing and Applying Objective Functions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 510. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56038-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56038-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42669-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56038-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics