Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sind die Löhne einkommensmaximierender Personen vergleichbar? Das Roy-Modell im Rückblick

  • Chapter
Zur Theorie, Empirie und Politik der Einkommensverteilung

  • 120 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Vor rund 50 Jahren entwickelte Roy (1950) ein verteilungstheoretisches Modell, mit dem er zeigt und zunächst scheinbar empirisch belegen kann, daß das multiplikative Zusammenwirken unabhängig und gleich verteilter individueller Grundfähigkeiten lognormalverteilte Arbeitsproduktivitäten und mithin Löhne impliziert. Der Aufsatz von Roy genoß lange Zeit große Beachtung in der Literatur, was unter anderem daran zu sehen ist, daß sein Beitrag noch in den 70er Jahren, als das breite wissenschaftliche Interesse an der Verteilungstheorie einen vorläufigen Höhepunkt erreichte, Eingang in eine Anzahl verteilungstheoretischer Monographien fand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arrow, K. (1962), „Higher Education As a Filter“, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., F. Bourguignon (Eds.) (2000), Handbook of Income Distribution, North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T., P. Pereira, M. Vogler, K. Zimmermann (1998), „Portuguese Migrants in the German Labor Market: Performance and Self-Selection“, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2047, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, A., R. Moffitt (1987), „The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-Selection Models“, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 24, pp. 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blümle, G. (1975), Theorie der Einkommensverteilung. Eine Einführung, Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1987), „Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants“, American Economic Review, Vol. 77, pp. 531–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (2000), „The Economic Analysis of Immigration“, O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 1697–1760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (1999), „The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings“, O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3 A, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 1801–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G., D. Leigh (1985), „The Endogeneity of Union Status: An Empirical Test“, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C, A. van Soest (1998), „Public and Private Sector Wages of Male Workers in Germany“, European Economic Review, Vol. 42, pp. 1417–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., J. Borland (2000), „Recent Developments in Public Sector Labor Markets“, O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3C, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 3529–3571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1976), „The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models“, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 5, pp. 475–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., B. Honoré (1990), „The Empirical Content of the Roy Model“, Econometrica, Vol. 58, pp. 1121–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., G. Sedlacek (1985), „Heterogeneity, Aggregation and Market Wage Functions: An Empirical Model of Self-Selection in the Labor Market“, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, pp. 1077–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, J. Smith, P. Todd (1996), „Sources of Selection Bias in Evaluating Social Programs: An Interpretation of Conventional Measures and Evidence on the Effectiveness of Matching As a Program Evaluation Method“, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 93, pp. 13416–13420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, P. Todd (1997), „Matching As an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Program“, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, pp. 605–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübler, O. (1991), „Einkommensdiskriminierung von Frauen und geschlechtsabhängige Einkommensdeterminanten“, Jahrbücher fur Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Bd. 208, S. 607–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. (1983), Labor Supply, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (UK).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Külp, B. (1974), Verteilungstheorie, Gustav Fischer Verlag: Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanot, G., I. Walker (1998), „The Union/Non-Union Wage Differential: An Application of Semi-Parametric Methods“, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 84, pp. 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (1976), „Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models by Two Stage Methods“, PhD-Dissertation, University of Rochester (NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (1978), „Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equation Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables“, International Economic Review, Vol. 19, pp. 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1976), „Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey“, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 5, pp. 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1974), Schooling, Experience and Earnings, NBER: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (2000), „New Developments in Econometric Methods for Labor Market Analysis“, O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 1367–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W., J. Powell, J. Walker (1998), „Semiparametric Estimation of Selection Models: New Results“, American Economic Review, Vol. 80, pp. 324–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W., T. Idson (2000), „Firm Size and Wages“, O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3B, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 2165–2214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pen, J. (1971), Income Distribution, Allen Lane: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudney, S. (1989), Modelling Individual Choice. The Econometrics of Corners, Kinks and Holes, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C, N. Thomas (1984), „Union Wage Differentials in the Public and Private Sector“, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 106–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (1950), „The Distribution of Earnings and of Individual Output“, Economic Journal, Vol. 60, pp. 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (1951), „Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings“, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 3, pp. 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattinger, M. (1993), „Assignment Models of the Distribution of Earnings“, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 31, pp. 831–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, R. (1997), „Discrimination in the Labor Market: A Gender Perspective“, P. Bacchetta, W. Wasserfallen (Eds.), Economic Policy in Switzerland, Macmillan: London, pp. 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sesselmeier, W., G. Blauermel (1998), Arbeitsmarkttheorien. Ein Überblick, 2. Aufl., Physica-Verlag: Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, G. (1992), „Selbstselektion und Bildungsrenditen. Ökonometrische Untersuchungen an einem Mikro-Datensatz für die Schweiz“, D. Sadowski, A. Timmesfeld (Hrsg.), Ökonomie und Politik beruflicher Bildung — Europäische Entwicklungen, Duncker&Humblot: Berlin, S. 105–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vella, F. (1998), „Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey“, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 33, pp. 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. (1995), „Human Capital vs. Signalling Explanations of Wages“, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, pp. 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R., S. Rosen (1979), „Education and Self-Selection“, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, pp. S 65–S98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. George Sheldon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheldon, G. (2002). Sind die Löhne einkommensmaximierender Personen vergleichbar? Das Roy-Modell im Rückblick. In: Zur Theorie, Empirie und Politik der Einkommensverteilung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56062-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56062-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62735-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56062-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation