Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Experimental Fluid Mechanics ((FLUID))

Abstract

The history of shadowgraphy was covered in Chap. 1, with more depth given below. The theory of light refraction by a schlieren object, underlying both schlieren and shadowgraphy, is given in Chap. 2 and Sect. A.6. In Sect. 2.3 a distinction was drawn between schlieren and the more-rudimentary approach of shadowgraphy, while in Sect. 2.4 the simple “direct” shadowgraph principle was stated. Here the various shadowgraph methods are covered in detail, naturally dividing them into “direct” and “focused” methods and a collection of lesser miscellany.

Shadow is the means by which bodies display their form.

Leonardo da Vinci, Notebooks

This method of observation is absolutely new, and I invite all physicists to try it. I believe it will lead to new discoveries in certain branches of physics

J. P. Marat [28]

In many cases where this method is employed there is a certain element of risk for the film, if not for the photographer1

W. F. Hilton [122]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. This comment by aerodynamicist William F. Hilton (1912–1997) refers to traditional “direct” shadowgraphy’s need for close proximity of the film to the test subject in the dark, which can sometimes be dangerous (e.g. explosions, propellers, and bullets in flight).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schardin [2] erroneously showed this peak at g/h=0.25, not 0.5. The mistake was later corrected by Weinberg [66] and Kessler and Hebenstreit [498].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Recall from Chap. 2 that a light ray passing through the forward focal plane of a lens — regardless of the ray angle — is returned to its same relative location at the back focus.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Occasionally, in thousands of references, schlierenis promised but a shadowgram is actually delivered. Aside from ignorance and the discrepancy in translating “shadow methods” from the Russian (noted earlier), the only other explanation is that the schlieren cutoff is either ineffectual or missing altogether. What then remains is the superimposed “focused” shadowgram, e.g. [1016].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Settles, G.S. (2001). Shadowgraph Techniques. In: Schlieren and Shadowgraph Techniques. Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56640-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56640-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63034-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56640-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics