Skip to main content

An Improved Lot Sizing Policy for Variable Demand

  • Conference paper
CAD/CAM Robotics and Factories of the Future ’90

Abstract

The methodology and usefulness of a new lot sizing policy for variable demand pattern termed Dynamic Least Incremental cost policy (DLIC) is describe. It is compared with the well known policies using a variety of demand patterns. The superiority of DLIC has been well established considering different performance criteria. It performs equally well like WWA when Eoq/D and CV are less than or equal to 1.5 and 1.17 respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aucamp, D.C., ‘A variable demand lot sizing procedure and a comparison with various well known strategies’, Int. J1, Prodn. and Inv. Mgt., 2nd Quarter, (1985), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berry, W.L., ‘Lot sizing procedures for requirements planning system: A frame work for analysis’, Production and Inventory Management, 13, (2), (1972), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buffa, E.S., ‘Modern production/operations management 7/E’., Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freeland, J.R. and Colley, J.L., ‘A simple heuristic method for the lot sizing in atime phased re-order system’, Int. J.. Prodn. and Inv. Mgt., 23, (1), (1982), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Groff, C, ‘A lot sizing rule for time phased component demand’, Int. J1. Prodn. and Inv. Mgt., 20 (1), (1979). 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaimann, R.A, ‘EOQ vs dynamic programming — which one to use for inv. ordering’, Int. J1. Prodn. & Inv. Mgt., (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Silver, E.A. and Meal, H.C., ‘A heuristic for….replenishment’, Int. J. Prodn. and Inv. Mgt., 14, (2), (1973), 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner, H.M. and Whitin, T., ‘Dynamic version of economic lot-size model’, Management Science, 5, (1), (1958), 89–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sreekumar, M.D., Reddy, C.E., Chetty, O.V.K. (1991). An Improved Lot Sizing Policy for Variable Demand. In: Dwivedi, S.N., Verma, A.K., Sneckenberger, J.E. (eds) CAD/CAM Robotics and Factories of the Future ’90. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58214-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58214-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63504-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58214-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics