Skip to main content

Econophysics: What Can Physicists Contribute to Economics?

  • Conference paper
Traffic and Granular Flow ’99

Abstract

In recent years, a considerable number of physicists have started applying physics concepts and methods to understand economic phenomena. The term “Econophysics” is sometimes used to describe this work. Economic fluctuations can have many repercussions, and understanding fluctuations is a topic that many physicists have contributed to in recent years. Further, economic systems are examples of complex interacting systems for which a huge amount of data exist and it is possible that the experience gained by physicists in studying fluctuations in physical systems might yield new results in economics. Much recent work in econophysics is focused on understanding the peculiar statistical properties of price fluctuations in financial time series. In this talk, we discuss three recent results. The first result concerns the probability distribution of stock price fluctuations. This distribution decreases with increasing fluctuations with a power-law tail well outside the Lévy stable regime and describes fluctuations that differ by as much as 8 orders of magnitude. Further, this non stable distribution preserves its functional form for fluctuations on time scales that differ by 3 orders of magnitude, from 1 min up to approximately 10 days. The second result concerns the accurate quantification of volatility correlations in financial time series. While price fluctuations themselves have rapidly decaying correlations, the volatility estimated by using either the absolute value or the square of the price fluctuations has correlations that decay as a power-law and persist for several months. The third result bears on the application of random matrix theory to understand the correlations among price fluctuations of any two different stocks. We compare the statistics of the cross-correlation matrix constructed from price fluctuations of the leading 1000 stocks and a matrix with independent random elements, i.e., a random matrix. Contrary to first expectations, we find little or no deviation from the universal predictions of random matrix theory for all but a few of the largest eigenvalues of the cross-correlation matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Bachelier, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 3, 21 (1900)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. V. Pareto, Cours d’Économie Politique, Lausanne and Paris, 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Lévy, Théorie de l’Addition des Variables Aléatoires, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.B. Mandelbrot, J.Business 36, 294 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.P. Bouchaud and M. Potters, Theorie des Risques Financiéres, (Alea-Saclay, Eyrolles, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.N. Mantegna and H.E. Stanley, An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Kondor and J. Kértesz, (Eds.), Econophysics: An Emerging Science, (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.N. Mantegna, (Ed.), Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Econophysics and Statistical Finance, Physica A [special issue] 269, 1 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K.B. Lauritsen, (Ed.), Application of Physics in Financial Analysis, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance [special issue], (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Lux and M. Marchesi, Nature 297, 498 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Lux, J. Econ. Behav. Organizat. 33, 143 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 22, 1 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Lux and M. Marchesi Appl. Econ. Lett. 3, 701 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Levy, H. Levy and S. Solomon, Econ. Lett. 45, 103 (1994).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Levy and S. Solomon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 7, 65 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.-P. Bouchaud and R. Cont, Eur. Phys. J.B 6, 543 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 12b.R. Cont and J.-P. Bouchaud, cond-mat/9712318.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Potters, R. Cont, and J.-P,. Bouchaud, Europhys. Lett. 41, 239 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.-P. Bouchaud and D. Sornette, J. Phys. I France 4, 863 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Sornette, A. Johansen, and J.-P. Bouchaud, J. Phys. I France 6, 167 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Sornette and A. Johansen, Physica A 261, 581 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Sornette, Physica A 256, 251 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Johansen and D. Sornette, Risk 1, 91 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 14f cond-mat/9901035; condmat/ 9811292.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Stauffer, Ann. Phys.-Berlin 7, 529 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Stauffer and T.J.P. Penna, Physica A 256, 284 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Chowdhury and D. Stauffer, Eur. Phys. J.B 8, 477 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. I. Chang and D. Stauffer, Physica A 264, 1 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Stauffer and T.J.P. Penna, Physica A 256, 284 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Stauffer, P.M.C. de Oliveria, and A.T.Bernardes, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 2, 83 (1999).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Maxsili and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2741 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. . G. Caldaxelli, M. Marsili, and Y.-C. Zhang, Europhys. Lett. 40, 479 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Galluccio, G. Calderelli, M. Marsili, and Y.-C. Zhang, Physica A 245, 423 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Marsili, S. Maslov, and Y.-C. Zhang, Physica A 253, 403 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Maslov and Y.-C. Zhang, Physica A 262, 232 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Challet and Y.C. Zhang, Physica A 256, 514 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Bak, M. Paczuski, and M. Shubik, Physica A 246, 430 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R.N. Mantegna and H.E. Stanley, Nature 376, 46 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Ghashghaie, W. Breymann, J. Peinke, P. Talkner, and Y. Dodge, Nature 381, 767 (1996); see also R.N. Mantegna and H.E. Stanley, Nature 383, 587 (1996); Physica A 239, 255 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Arneodo, J.-F. Muzy, and D. Sornette, Eur. Phys. J.B 2, 277 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Pasquini and M. Serva, cond-mat/9810232; cond-mat/9903334.

    Google Scholar 

  42. M.M. Dacorogna, U.A. Muller, R.J. Nagler, R.B. Olsen, and O.V. Pictet, J. Int. Money and Finance 12, 413 (1993); see also the Olsen website at http://www.olsen.ch for related papers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R. Cont, Statistical Finance: Empirical study and theoretical modeling of price variations in financial markets, PhD Thesis, (Universite de Paris XI, 1998) condmat/ 9705075;

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. Cont, M. Potters, and J.-P. Bouchaud, In: Scale Invariance and Beyond, B. Dubrulle, F. Graner, and D. Sornette, (Eds.), (Springer, Berlin, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  45. N. Vandewalle and M. Ausloos, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 9, 711 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. N. Vandewalle and M. Ausloos, Eur. Phys. J.B 4, 257 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. N. Vandewalle, P. Boveroux, A. Minguet, and M. Ausloos, Physica A 255, 201 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. H. Takayasu, A.H. Sato, and M. Takayasu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 966 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. H. Takayasu, H. Miura, T. Hirabayashi, and K. Hamada, Physica A 184, 127 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. K.N. Ilinski and A.S. Stepanenko, cond-mat/9806138; cond-mat/9902046; K.N. Ilinski, cond-mat/9903142.

    Google Scholar 

  51. R.N. Mantegna, Physica A 179, 232 (1991); J. Skjeltrop, University of Oslo Thesis, Oslo, Norway, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. Pagan, J. Empirical Finance 3, 15 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. G.W. Kim and H.M. Markowitz, J. Portfolio Management 16, 45 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. E.J. Elton and M.J. Gruber, Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, (J. Wiley, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  55. J.-P. Bouchaud, cond-mat/9806101; D.F. Wang, cond-mat/9807066; condmat/ 9809045; J.-P. Bouchaud, G. Iori, and D. Sornette, Risk 93, 61 (1996); M. Rosa-Clot and S. Taddei, cond-mat/9901277; cond-mat/9901279; B.E. Baaquie, cond-mat/9708178; R. Cont, cond-mat/9902018.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Y. Liu, P. Gopikrishnan, P. Cizeau, M. Meyer, C.-K. Peng, and H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1390 (1999); cond-mat/9903369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. R.N. Mantegna and H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2946 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. P. Gopikrishnan, M. Meyer, L.A.N. Amaral, and H.E. Stanley, Eur. Phys. J. B3, 139 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  59. P. Gopikrishnan, V. Plerou, L.A.N. Amaral, M. Meyer, and H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5305 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. V. Plerou, P. Gopikrishnan, L.A.N. Amaral, M. Meyer, and H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E60, 6519 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Y. Liu, P. Cizeau, M. Meyer, C.-K. Peng, and H.E. Stanley, Physica A 245, 437 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  62. F. Black and M. Scholes, J. Pol. Economy 81, 637 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. I. Koponen, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1197 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. M.M. Dacorogna, U.A. Muller, O.V. Pictet, and C.G. de Vries (Olsen group, www.olsen.ch, 199x).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Z. Ding, C.W.J. Granger, and R.F. Engle, J. Emp. Finance 1, 83 (1983); For foreign exchange markets the decay time is even smaller [22].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. E.-F. Fama, J. Finance 25, 383 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. T. Bollerslev, R.Y. Chou, and K.F. Kroner, J. Econometrics 52, 5 (1992).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. G.W. Schwert, J. Finance 44, 1115 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. A.R. Gallant, P.E. Rossi, and G. Tauchen, Rev. of Financial Studies 5, 199 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. B. Le Baron, J. Business 65, 199 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. K. Chan, K.C. Chan, and G.A. Karolyi, Rev. of Financial Studies 4, 657 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. C.W.J. Granger and Z. Ding, J. Econometrics 73, 61 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. P. Cizeau, Y. Liu, M. Meyer, C.-K. Peng, and H.E. Stanley, Physica A 245, 441 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. J. Beran, Statistics for Long-Memory Processes, (Chapman &; Hall, NY, 1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. S. Galluccio, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters, Physica A 259, 449 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. L. Laloux, P. Cizeau, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters, cond-mat/9810255; Risk 3, 69 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  77. S. Galluccio, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1467 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. V. Plerou, P. Gopikrishnan, B. Rosenow, L.A.N. Amaral, and H.E. Stanley, condmat/ 9903369); Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1471 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. E.P. Wigner, Ann. Math. 53, 36 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. E.P. Wigner, in: Conference on Neutron Physics by Time-of-flight, (Gatlinburg, Tennessee, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  81. F.J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 3, 140 (1962).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. F.J. Dyson and M.L. Mehta, J. Math. Phys. 4, 701 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. M.L. Mehta and F.J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 4, 713 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. T. Guhr, A. Miiller-Groeling, and H.A. Weidenrmiller, Phys. Rep. 299, 190 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. M.L. Mehta, Random Matrices, (Academic Press, Boston, 1991).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. A.M. Sengupta and P.P. Mitra, cond-mat/9709283.

    Google Scholar 

  87. H. Takayasu and K. Okuyama, Fractals 6, 67 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Y. Lee, L.A.N. Amaral, D. Canning, M. Meyer, and H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3275 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. . V. Plerou, L.A.N. Amaral, P. Gopikrishnan,M. Meyer, and H.E. Stanley, Nature 400, 433 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. T. Keitt and H.E. Stanley, Nature 393, 257 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. M.H.R. Stanley, L.A.N. Amaral, S.V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, H. Leschhorn, P. Maass, M.A. Salinger, and H.E. Stanley, Nature 379, 804 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. L.A.N. Amaral, S.V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, H. Leschhorn, P. Maass, M.A. Salinger, H.E. Stanley, and M.H.R. Stanley, J. Phys. I France 7, 621 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. S.V. Buldyrev, L.A.N. Amaral, S. Havlin, H. Leschhorn, P. Maass, M.A. Salinger, H.E. Stanley, and M.H.R. Stanley, J. Phys. I France 7, 635 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. L.A.N. Amaral, S.V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M.A. Salinger, and H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1385 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. R.F. Engle, Econometrica 50, 987 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  96. R. Bailie, J. Econometrics 17, 223 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stanley, H.E., Nunes Amaral, L.A., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V., Rosenow, B. (2000). Econophysics: What Can Physicists Contribute to Economics?. In: Helbing, D., Herrmann, H.J., Schreckenberg, M., Wolf, D.E. (eds) Traffic and Granular Flow ’99. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59751-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59751-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64109-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59751-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics