Skip to main content
  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

The creation of pneumoperitoneum causes a host of physiologic responses which are described throughout this text. We have described in a concise manner the additional effects that must be considered when contemplating the creation of a pneumoperitoneum in a patient with cancerous disease. The use of pneumoperitoneum in a patient with cancer is unique because of the many pathophysiologic interactions that are just now beginning to be understood. The most obvious concern, and the one presently in the spotlight, is the concern of port site metastasis. In this chapter, we have attempted to summarize the important features of the relationship between pneumoperitoneum and port site recurrence, not only on a basic science level, but also from a clinical perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kakkar VV, Flang C, Howe CT, Clarke MB (1969) Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 2: 230–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kakkar VV, Cohen AT, Edmonson RA et al (1993) Low molecular weight versus standard heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after major abdominal surgery. Lancet 341: 259–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chamberlain G, Brown JC (1978) Gynecological laparoscopy. The report of the working party of the confidential enquiry into gynaecological laparoscopy. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beebe DS, McNevin MP, Crain JM et al (1993) Evidence of venous stasis after abdominal insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176: 443–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jorgensen JO, Lalak NJ, North L et al (1994) Venous stasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Lapar Endosc 4: 128–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ido K, Suzuki T, Kimura K et al (1995) Lower extremity venous stasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as assessed using color doppler ultrasound. Surg Endosc 9: 310–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayol J,Vincent-Hamelin E, Sarmiento JM et al (1994) Pulmonary embolism following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of two cases and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 8: 214–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cochrane JPS, Forsling ML, Gow NM, LeQuesne LP (1981) Arginine vasopressin release following surgical operations. Br J Surg 68: 209–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Punnonen R, Viinamaki O (1982) Vasopressin release during laparoscopy: role of increased intraabdominal pressure. Lancet 1: 175–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nussey SS, Bevan DH, Ang VTY, Jenkins JS (1986) Effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) infusions on circulating concentrations of platelet AVP, Factor VIII: C and von Willebrand Factor. Thromb Haemost 55: 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caprini JA,Arcelus JI, Laubach M et al (1995) Postoperative hypercoagulability and deep-vein thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9: 304–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barsaum GH,Windsor CW (1992) Parietal seeding of carcinoma of the gallbladder after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 79: 846–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Siriwardena A, Samarji WN (1993) Cutaneous tumor seeding from a previously undiagnosed pancreatic carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Eng175: 199–200

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cava A, Roma J, Gonzales QA et al (1990) Subcutaneous metastasis following laparoscopy in gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 16: 63–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cirocco WC,Schwartzmann A,Golub RW (1994) Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Surgery 116: 842–846

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aractingi S, Marolleau JP, Daniel MT et al (1993) Localisations sous-cutane de lymphoma de Brukitt aux points de penetrations d’un coelioscope. Ann Dermatol Venereo1120: 796–797

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hsiu JJ, Given FT, Kemp GM (1968) Tumor implantation after diagnostic laparoscopic biopsy of ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Obstet Gynecol 68: 90–93

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes ESR, McDermott FT, Polglase AL, Johnson WR (1983) Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large-bowel cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 26: 571–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dobronte F, Wittman T, Karlesony G (1978) Rapid development of malignant metastasis in the abdominal wall after laparoscopy. Endoscopy 10: 127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobi CA, Keller H, Monig S, Said S (1995) Implantable metastasis of unspected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 9: 351–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Copher JC, Rogers JJ, Dalton ML (1995) Trocar-site metastasis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for unsuspected carcinoma of the gallbladder. Surg Endosc 9: 348–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramos JM, Gopta S, Anthone GJ et al (1994) Is the port-site at risk? A preliminary report. Arch Surg 129: 897–900

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Seiler CA (1995) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a safe way to cure cancer? Digest Surg 12: 302–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore GE, Sako K, Tatsuhei K (1961) Assessment of the exfoliation of tumor cells into the body cavities. Surg Gynecol Obstet 112: 469–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Juhl H, Stritzel M, Wroblewski A et al (1994) Immunocytological detection of micrometastatic cells. Comparative evaluation of findings in the peritoneal cavity and the bone marrow of gastric, colorectal and pancreatic cancer patients. Int J Cancer 57: 330–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pool EH, Dunlop GR (1934) Cancer cells in the bloodstream. Am J Surg 21: 99–102

    Google Scholar 

  27. Engell HC (1959) Cancer cells in the blood: a five to nine-year follow-up study. Ann Surg 149: 457–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy P, Alexander P, Senior PV et al (1988) Mechanisms of organ selective tumour growth by bloodborne cancer cells. Br J Cancer 57: 19–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vernick J, Garside G, Hoppe E (1964) The lack of growth of intravenously inoculated tumor cells in the peripheral wounds. Cancer Res 24: 1507–1508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO, Williamson RCN (1984) Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 71: 659–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones DB, Goo LW, Reinhard MK et al (1995) Impact of pneumoperitoneum on trocar site implantation of colon cancer in hamster model. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 1182–1188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Savalgi RS (1995) Mechanism of abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic resection of colonic cancers. Semin Laparosc Surg 2: 158–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murthy SM, Goldschmidt RA, Rao LN et al (1989) The influence of surgical trauma on experimental metastatic cancer. Cancer 64: 2036–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ryall C (1907) Cancer infection and cancer recurrence: a danger to avoid in cancer operations. Lancet

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nduka CC, Munson JRT, Mences-Gow N, Darzi A (1981) Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 81: 648–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Redmond PH, Watson WG, Houghton T et al (1994) Immune function in patients undergoing open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 129: 1240–1246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Kayton ML et al (1995) Increased tumor establishment and growth after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in a murine model. Arch Surg 130: 649–653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis MR, Cole WH (1958) Experimental increase of lung metastases after operative trauma (amputation of limb with tumor). AMA Arch Surg 77: 621–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Eggermont AMM, Steller EP, Marquet RL et al (1988) Local regional promotion of tumor growth after abdominal surgery is dominant over immunotherapy with interlukin-2 and lymphokine activated killer cells. Cancer Detect Prey 12: 421–429

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Goshima H, Sagi S, Forata T et al (1989) Experimental study on preventative effects on lung metastases using LAK cells induced from various lymphocytes-special references on enhancement of lung metastasis after laparotomy stress. Jpn J Surg Soc 90: 1245–1250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jakub, J., Greene, F.L. (1998). Pneumoperitoneum in Cancer. In: Rosenthal, R.J., Friedman, R.L., Phillips, E.H. (eds) The Pathophysiology of Pneumoperitoneum. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60290-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60290-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64339-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60290-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics