Skip to main content

The Case for a Group Libel Law in Great Britain

  • Conference paper
Minorities: Community and Identity

Part of the book series: Life Sciences Research Reports ((DAHLEM LIFE,volume 27))

  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

The term “group libel” in this paper refers to that genre of legal processes in which the right to maintain an action is delegated to a representative body empowered by statute to maintain an action for defamation on behalf of a particular racial, ethnic, national, or religious section of the general public. The nature of the action varies from country to country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

NOTES

  1. See report of Faurisson case (Le Monde, 18 July 1981) for application of French statute which authorizes representative communal organizations to maintain an action for racial defamation.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Law for the suppression of racism enacted 30 July 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Italian Law No. 962, Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 9 October 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Article 28….

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federation of Swiss Jewish Communities v. Mathez (Canton of Vaud, 19 December 1968 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Racial Discrimination [White Paper Command 6234, HMSO September 1975].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Race Relations Act 1965 [Section 6].

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Times (London), 9 January 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For a study of Nazi recruitment of schoolchildren and teenagers, see “Nazis in the playground,” published by the Centre for Contemporary Studies, London, England, May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Review of Public Order Act Command 7891, HMSO April 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Judge McKinnon, quoted in Sunday Telegraph (London), 8 January 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daily Telegraph (London) report, 25 July 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daily Mail (London), 30 January 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guardian (London), 13 January 1982. (15) Guardian, 29 September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guardian, 29 September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Section 70, Race Relations Act of 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Command 7891 (as above).

    Google Scholar 

  18. New Law Journal, 25 March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Under Section 5A [subsection 6], publication and distribution to members of an association of which the publisher and distributor is himself a member is exempted from prosecution under the Act.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schenk v. US 249, US 47 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

C. Fried

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Dr. S. Bernhard, Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gewirtz, J. (1983). The Case for a Group Libel Law in Great Britain. In: Fried, C. (eds) Minorities: Community and Identity. Life Sciences Research Reports, vol 27. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69311-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69311-3_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69313-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69311-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics