Skip to main content

Dissonance and Action Control

  • Chapter
Action Control

Part of the book series: SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

Imagine that you have bought a car which you expect to drive faster than 120 miles per hour. After breaking it in you try to reach the car’s top speed and find that it is less than 120 miles per hour. Selling the car would cause financial loss, so you have to keep it. Will you be dissatisfied with the car from now on and think you made a wrong decision each time you drive it? Fortunately, there are certain cognitive strategies which allow you to enjoy driving the car after this experience of inconsistency between your expectation about the car’s top speed and its actual performance. You may search for positive information, for example that 110 miles per hour is still much faster than most other cars can do; that your car is safer and more comfortable than other cars, etc. Such cognitive operations will reduce the discontent you felt when experiencing the inconsistency between the car’s actual speed and your expectation about it.

Preparation of this chapter was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The authors are grateful to Dieter Frey, Julius Kuhl, and Gün Semin for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R.P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. H. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.) Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp.5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 4, (pp. 115–133). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J.M. (1963). Effect of severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 584–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J. (1984). Kognitive Dissonanz: Eine handlungstheoretische Perspektive. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J. (1984). Extrinsic vs. intrinsic reduction of cognitive dissonance. (Manuscript submitted for publication.) Max-Planck-Institute for Psychological Research, Muinch, FRG. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J., & Kuhl, J. (1984) Altering information to gain action-control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision-making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, A.D. (1967). Life and death in extreme captivity situations. In M. H. Appley & R. Trumbull (Eds.) Psychological stress: Issue in research, (pp. 242–264). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramel, D. (1968). Dissonance, expectation, and the self. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, H.M. Rosenberg & P.H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp.355–365). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1962) An experiment on thirst. In J. W. Brehm & A. R. Cohen (Eds.) Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J.W., & Crocker, J.C. (1962). An experiment on hunger. In J.W. Brehm & A. R. Cohen (Eds.) Explorations in cognitive dissonance, (pp. 137–143). New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J.W., & Wicklund, R.A. (1970). Regret and dissonance reduction as a function of postdecision salience of dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canon, L. K. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information. In L. Festinger (Ed.) Conflict, decision and dissonance (pp.83–95). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapanis, N.P. & Chapanis, A. (1964). Cognitive dissonance. Five years later. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. A. (1953). Human behavior in the concentration camp. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. H., & Batson, C. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dis-positional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, D., Guttman, J., Schönbach, P, & Mills, J. (1957). Postdecision exposure to relevant information. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N.T. (1963). Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: A study of cognitive dissonance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 14, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellner, C. H., & Marshall, J. R. (1970). Kidney donors. In J. Macauley & L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior, (pp. 269–281). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston Ill.: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (Ed.). (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Standord: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. L. (1965). Preference for dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 287–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 57–97). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. (1981). Informationssuche und Informationsbewertung bei Entscheidungen. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., & Irle, M. (1972). Some conditions to produce a dissonance and an incentive effect in a “Forced-compliance” situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabitz, H. J. (1971). Zur Beziehung von Inertia-Effekt und sequentieller Position widersprechender Ereignisse bei der Revision subjektiver Wahrscheinlichkeiten. Psychologische Forschung, 35, 35–45. (a)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grabitz, H.-J. (1971). Die Bewertung von Information vor Entscheidungen in Abhängigkeit von der verfolgten Alternative und der Verläßlichkeit der Information. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 2, 383–388. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle, M. (1975). Lehrbuch der Sozialpsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle, M. (Ed.). (1982). Decision making: Social psychological and socioeconomic analyses. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1962). Comments on J. Brehm, Motivational effects of cognitive dissonance. In M.D. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1962 (pp.78–81). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The Psychology of Commitment. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (1971). Structure and functions of fantasy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E., Barta, S.G., Mahoney, T.W., et al. (1976). Motivation, mood, and mental events. Patterns and implications for adaptive processes. In G. Serban (Ed.), Psychopathology of human adaptation (pp.95–112). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1981). Aufmerksamkeitslenkung und Handlungskontrolle. (Unpublished manuscript.) Ruhr-Universität Bochum, FRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1982). Action vs. state-orientation as a mediator between motivation and action. In W. Hacker, W. Volpert & M. von Cranach, M. (Eds.), Cognitive and motivational aspects of action. Amsterdam: North-Holland-Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action-control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in Experimental Personality Research. Vol.13, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1983). Handlungskontrolle und Umfang der Informationsverarbeitung: Wahl einer einfachen (nicht optimalen) Entscheidungsregel zugunsten rascher Handlungsbereitschaft. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 14, 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K (1952). Group decision and social change. In G. Swanson, T. Newcomb & E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in Social Psychology (pp. 197–211). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, D. E., & Crane, K. A. (1970). A reactance theory analysis of predecisional cognitive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 258–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, D.E., Wortman, C.B., & Brehm, J.W. (1971). Temporal changes in predecision preferences among choice alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 282–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, L., Janis, I. L., & Chaplin, R. (1969). Effects of anticipation of forthcoming information on predecisional processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.-H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In J. M. V. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavioral disorders (Vol.1) (pp. 431–465). New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N.E. (1951). Learnable drives and rewards. In S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp.435–472). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., Aronson, E., & Robinson, H. (1959). Selectivity in exposure to information. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 250–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., & O’Neal, E. (1971). Anticipated choice, attention, and the halo effect. Psychonomic Science, 22, 2331–2333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möntmann, V., & Schönborn, C. (1982). Operationale und theoretische Probleme zum Verlauf der Änderungsresistenz von Kognitionen. Manuscript, University of Mannheim, FRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, E. (1971). Influence of future choice importance and arousal upon the halo effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 334–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, E., & Mills, J. (1969). The influence of anticipated choice on the halo effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 347–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1961). Postdecision affinity for incompatible information. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 188–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G. J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1965). Biased indoctrination and selectivity of exposure to new information. Sociometry, 28, 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Songer-Nocks, E. (1976). Situational factors affecting the weighting of predictor components in the Fishbein model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E. (1964). The temporal sequence of post-decision processes. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision and dissonance (pp. 112–127). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R.A., & Frey, D. (1981) Cognitive consistency: Motivational vs. non-motivational perspectives. Social Cognition, 1, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger, J.C., Walker, L., & Arrowood, A. J. (1977). Postdecision dissonance at the fair. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 284–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beckmann, J., Irle, M. (1985). Dissonance and Action Control. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (eds) Action Control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69748-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69746-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics