Skip to main content

A Comparison of Presentation and Representation: Linguistic and Pictorial

  • Conference paper
Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

In his book Brainstorms (1978) Daniel Dennett makes some very important remarks about man and computers. The main theme of the book is that computers lack intentions, whereas we, humans, can understand each other because we have and use intentions. In the chapter “Conditions of Personhood” Dennett puts the following question:

Do we communicate with computers in Fortran? Fortran seems to be a language; it has a grammar, a vocabulaire, a semantics. The transactions in Fortran between man and machine are often viewed as cases of man communicating with machine, but such transactions are pale copies of human verbal communication precisely because the Gricean conditions for nonnatural meaning have been bypassed. There is no room for them to apply. Achieving’s one’s end in transmitting a bit of Fortran to the machine does not hinge on getting the machine to recognize one’s intentions. This does not mean that all communications with computers in the future will have this short-coming (or strength, depending on your purposes), but just that we do not now communicate, in the strong (Gricean) sense, with computers, (p. 280)

The strong (Gricean) sense of communication is totally based on first and higher order intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson J.R. (1983). The Architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J. R.& Bower G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Winston, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D.C.(1978). Brainstorms. Harvester Press, Hassocks, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H.L. (Ed.). (1982). Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science. M.I.T. Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin C.Z.(1983). With reference to reference. Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvester Press. Hassocks, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. (1968). Languages of art. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. (1972). Problems and Projects. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. (1984). Of mind and other matters. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice H.P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, LXVI, pp. 377–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers P.A. & Smythe W.E. (1979). Images, symbols and skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33 (3), pp. 158–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn S.M. (1981). Image and mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 2, pp. 135–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer S.F. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In: Cognition and categorization. E.H. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn Z.W. (1984). Computation and cognition. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart D.E. & Norman D.A. (1983). Representation in memory. Cognitive Science Laboratory, La Jolla, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R. (1984). Intentionality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard R.N. & Metzler J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, pp. 701–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H.A. (1978). On the forms of mental representation. In: Perception and cognition. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. IX.) C. Wade Savage (Ed.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffers A. (1984). Mathematisch-didactische Stromingen en Onderzoek van Wiskunde-onderwijs. In: Rekenen. P.G. Vos, K.B. Koster & J. Kingma, (Eds.). Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuiving E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford. University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk W. (1977). Retrieval from semantic memory. Academisch Proefschrift, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jorna, R. (1988). A Comparison of Presentation and Representation: Linguistic and Pictorial. In: van der Veer, G.C., Mulder, G. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73402-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73402-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73404-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73402-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics