Skip to main content

Population Genetics

  • Chapter
Progress in Botany

Part of the book series: Progress in Botany/Fortschritte der Botanik ((BOTANY,volume 51))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

This contribution is concerned with three topics in population biology: sexual selection, the evolution of sex, and population structure and gene flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson MB, Bradbury JM (eds) (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives, 1–8. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson GY, Symon DE (1989) Evolution 43:204–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ (1987) Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection: a review. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 283–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1976) “Mistake” pollination as a reproductive system with special reference to the Caricaceae. In: Burley J, Styles BT (eds). Tropical trees, breeding and conservation. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH (1987) Genet Res 50:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Slatkin M (1986) Heredity 56:409–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS, Opler PA (1975) Evolution 29:167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (1982) The masterpiece of nature. The evolution and the genetics of sexuality. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (1985) Proc Royal Soc Lond B 224:223–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1982) Am Nat 119:649–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1985) Am Nat 126:750–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham RT, Squillace RA (1955) For Sci 1:121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boecklen WJ (1986) Biol Conserv 39:323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookman SS (1984) Evolution 38:72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull JJ, Thomson C, Ng D, Moore R (1987) Am Nat 129:143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile MJ (1987) Genetic exchange and gene flow: their promotion and prevention. 203–214. In: Brasier CM, Rayner ADM, Moore D (eds) Evolutionary biology of fungi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 203-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1979) Evolution 43:41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Schemske DW, Sork VL (1987) The evolution of plant reproductive characters; sexual versus natural selection. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currah L (1986) Pollen competition and the breeding system in the onion (Allium cepa L.). In: Mulcahy DL et al. (eds) Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. Elsevier, New York, pp 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descendent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Nettancourt D (1977) Incompatibility in angiossperms. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson BK, Clegg MT (1986) Am Nat 128:840–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetic theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LE (1975) Ecological consequences of coevolution between butterflies and plants. In: Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouyon PH, King EB, Bonnet JM, Valdeyron G, Vernet P (1987) Oecologia 72:92–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray AJ (1986) Do invading species have definable genetic characteristics? In: Kronberg H, Williamson MH (eds) Quantitative aspects of the ecology of biological invasions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 314:655-674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorius H-R (1987) Theor Appl Genet 74: 397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorius H-R, Roberds JH (1986) Theor Appl Genet 71:826–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL (1987) Gene flow and the distribution of genetic variation in plant populations. In: Urbanska CHM (ed) Differential patterns in higher plants. Academic Press, London, pp 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornbey CA, Li SC (1975) Can J Plant Sci 55:127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (1988) The present standing of the theory of sexual selection. In: De Beer GR (ed) Essays on aspects of evolutionary biology, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 11–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay QON (1978) The role of preferential and assortative pollination in the maintenance of flower colour polymorphism. In: Richards AJ (ed) The pollination of flowers by insects. Linnean Soc, London, pp 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koella SC (1988) J Evol Biol 2:95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1981) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 79:3721–3725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Bazzaz FA (1982) Ecology 63:1374–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Hartgerinck AP (1986) Pollination intensity, fruit maturation pattern and offspring quality in Cassia fasciculata. In: Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Ottaviano E (eds) Biotechnology and ecology of pollen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 417–422.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin BC (1972) Am Nat 106:453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1986) Breeding structure and genetic variation. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant ecology. Blackwell Sci Publ, Palo Alto, pp 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1988a) Am Nat 132:309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1988b) Am Nat 132:643–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB (1988) Evolution 42:1047–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeschcke V (1988a) Naturw Rundschau 41:261–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeschcke V (1988b) Naturw Rundschau 41:310–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1986) Am Nat 127:446–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1985) J Theor Biol 115:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna MA (1986) Heterostyly and microgametophytic selection: the effect of pollen tube composition on sporophyte vigor in two distylous species. In: Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Ottoviano E (eds) Biotechnology and ecology of pollen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna MA, Mulcahy DL (1983) Ecological aspects of gametophytic competition in Dianthus chinensis. Mulcahy DL (ed). In: Pollen: biology and implications of plant breedings. Elsevier, New York, pp 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meagher TR (1986) Am Nat 128:199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michod RE, Levin B (eds) (1988) The evolution of sex. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL (1974) Adaptive significance of gamte competition. In: Linskens HF (ed) Fertilisation in higher plants. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy DB (1975) Theor Appl Genet 46:270–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1987) Am Sci 75:44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Ottaviano E (1975) Sporophytic expression of gametophytic competition in Petunia hybrida. In: Mulcahy DL (ed) Gamete competition in plants and animals. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamara R (1986) Am J Bot 73:1049–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker MA (1988) Evolution 42:239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck JR, Feldman MW (1988) Science 240:1672–1674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson S, Simonsen V, Loeschcke V (1987) Theor Appl Genet 75:200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1983) Nature 305:706–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1985) Oikos 44:373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1987) Sexual selection in flowering plants. 165–179. In: Bradbury J, Andersson M (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Dahlem Conf Rep, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 165-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers AR, Jorde LB (1987) Ann Hum Genet 51:169–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (1980) Biotropiae 12:169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Fenster C (1983) Pollen grain interactions in a neotropical Costus: effects of clump size and competitors. In: Mulcahy DL (ed) Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. Elsevier, New York, pp 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Lande R (1985) Evolution 39:41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Lande R (1986) Evolution 40:436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Lande R (1987) Am Nat 130:804–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ, Clegg MT (1985) Evolution 39:1242–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seavey SR, Bawa KS (1986) Bot Rev 52:195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1985) Evolution 39:53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1987) Science 236:787–792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA (1986) Am J Bot 73:139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Mazer SJ (1988) Evolution 42:1065–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1986) Conservation biology. The sience of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Snow AA, Stanton SN (1986) Science 232:1625–1627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1987) Why sex evolves and the differences it makes. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birfchauser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1981) Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1982) Evolution 36:762–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Bertin RI (1987) Male competition, female choice and sexual selection in plants. In: Read L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Winsor JA (1986) Evolution 40:453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Winsor JA, Davis LE (1986) Effects of pollen load size on fruit maturation and sporophyte quality in Zuccini. In: Mulcahy BL, Mulcahy GB (eds) Biotechnolgy and ecology of pollen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Ganders FR (1986) Am J Bot 73:1645–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S (1986) Evolution 40:117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk H (1987) Theor Appl Genet 73:724–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Lande R (1987) Genet Res 49:147–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ, McCauley BE (1988) Evolution 42:995–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace BJ (1987) Heredity 78:134–142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waller BM (1986) Am Nat 128:421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Evolution 38:1358–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF (1979) Am Nat 113:770–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF, Burley N (1983) Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor JA, Davis LE, Stephenson AG (1987) Am Nat 129:643–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wöhrmann K, Loeschcke V (1989) Population genetics. In: Behnke HD, Esser K, Kubitzki K, Runge M, Ziegler H (eds) Progress in botany, Vol 49. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1951) Ann Eugenics 15:323–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yampolsky C, Yampolsky H (1922) Biblio Genet 3:1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohavi A (1975) J Theor Biol 53:205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wöhrmann, K. (1989). Population Genetics. In: Behnke, HD., Esser, K., Kubitzki, K., Runge, M., Ziegler, H. (eds) Progress in Botany. Progress in Botany/Fortschritte der Botanik, vol 51. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75154-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75154-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75156-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75154-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics