Abstract
The measured conductance σ (V) of a tunnel junction between two metals may depart from the simple idealization of a constant σ0, independent of applied bias voltage V for several more or less basic reasons, which will be the topic of this review. First, a nearly temperature independent quadratic increase in conductance σ = σ0 + σ1 (V−V0)2 is often observed, and may reasonably be ascribed to the distortion of a rectangular or trapezoidal insulating tunnel barrier with variation of V. An offset V0 of the structure may arise from a built-in electric field across the barrier. Such an effect is almost an intrinsic feature, therefore, of a tunnel junction. Two other frequently observed temperature-dependent structures which occur precisely at V = 0, on the other hand, are evidence for tunneling mechanisms additional to direct elastic tunneling and are associated with additional localized electron states in or near the barrier. A “giant resistance peak,” or conductance minimum has convincingly been ascribed to two-step tunneling across the barrier via real intermediate states occurring on small metal particles imbedded in the barrier. Variations of this effect have been seen in other contexts, including that of metal-semiconductor tunneling. The narrower and weaker conductance peak can be attributed to magnetic scattering of tunneling electrons from paramagnetic impurities at the edge of the barrier, effects which may be described as Kondo and spin-flip scattering across the tunneling barrier. Finally, the effect of a narrow conduction band in leading to an asymmetric tunnel conductance will be briefly described.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W.L. McMillan, J.M. Rowell: in “Superconductivity” R.D. Parks, Editor ( Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, (1969), p. 561
P.K. Hansma: paper CA2 in this Conference
W.F. Brinkman, R.C. Dynes, J.M. Rowell: J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1915 (1970)
D.G. Walmsley, R.B. Floyd, W.E. Timms: Solid State Commun. 22, 497 (1977)
P.N. Trofimenkoff, H.J. Kruezer, W.J. Wattamaniuk, J.G. Adler: Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 597 (1972)
A more complete discussion of these topics is given by E.L. Wolf, in Solid State Physics 30, 1 (1975)
P.K. Hansma: paper SA1 in this Conference
E.L. Wolf, D.L. Losee: Phys. Rev. B 2, 3660 (1970)
J. Kondo: Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 32, 37 (1964)
H.R. Zeller, I. Giaever: Phys. Rev. 181, 789 (1969)
E.L. Wolf, R.H. Wallis, C. J. Adkins: Phys. R.v. B 12, 1603 (1975)
Sir Nevill Mott: “Metal-Insulator Transitions” ( Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 1974 ), p. 34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wolf, E.L. (1978). Zero Bias Anomalies in Tunneling: A Review. In: Wolfram, T. (eds) Inelastic Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81228-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81228-6_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-81230-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81228-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive