Skip to main content

Advantages and Rationale for Pressure Controlled Ventilation

  • Conference paper
Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 1994

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 1994 ((YEARBOOK,volume 1994))

Abstract

Ashbaugh and colleagues [1] in 1969 have used low levels positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with volume controlled ventilation (VCV) (5–10 cm H2O) in the treatment of hypoxemia in adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). They also indicated that higher levels of PEEP could cause barotrauma, decrease cardiac output and therefore decrease O2 transport although PaO2 is increased. Falke and coworkers [2] defined in 1972 the “optimal PEEP” as a level of PEEP which provided a PaO2 > 100 mm Hg with FiO2 ≤0.5. In 1975, Suter and colleagues [3] accepted the “optimal PEEP” as a value providing best oxygen transport and lung compliance, which could be obtained with a PEEP level up to 12 cm H2O. Application of PEEP has been reported to lower cardiac output [3, 4]. However, Qvist et al. [5] demonstrated in 1975 that the adverse hemodynamic effects of PEEP could be limited by additional fluid administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashbaugh DG, Petty TL, Bigelow DB, Harris TM (1969) Continuous positive-pressure breathing (CPPB) in adult respiratory distress syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57: 31–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Falke KJ, Pontoppidan H, Kumar A, Leith DE, Geffin B, Laver MB (1972) Ventilation with end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease. J Clin Invest 51: 2315–2323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Suter PM, Fairley HB, Isenberg MD (1975) Optimum end-expiratory airway pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failure. N Engl J Med 292: 284–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lutch JS, Murray JF (1972) Continuous positive pressure ventilation: Effects on systemic oxygen transport and tissue oxygenation. Ann Intern Med 76: 193–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Qvist J, Pontoppidan H, Wilson RS, Lowenstein E, Laver MB (1975) Hemodynamic responses to mechanical ventilation with PEEP: The effect of hypervolemia. Anesthesiology 42: 45–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynolds EOR (1971) Effect of alterations in mechanical ventilator settings on pulmonary gas exchange in hyaline membrane disease. Arch Dis Child 46: 152–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lachmann B, Johnson B, Lindroth M, Robertson B (1982) Modes of artificial ventilation in severe respiratory distress syndrome. Lung function and morphology in rabbits after washout of alveolar surfactant. Crit Care Med 10: 724–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lachmann B, Danzmann E, Haendly B, Jonson B (1982) Ventilator settings and gas exchange in respiratory distress syndrome. In: Prakash O (ed) Applied physiology in clinical respiratory care. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, pp 141–176

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lachmann B, Haendly B, Schultz H (1980) Improved oxygenation, CO2 elimination, compliance and decreased barotrauma following changes of volume-generated PEEP ventilation with inspiratory/expiratory (I/E) ratio of 1/2 to pressure-generated ventilation with I/E ratio of 4/1 in patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS ). Intensive Care Med 6: 64

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen JB (1986) Changing ventilatory strategy may alter outcome in catastrophic lung disease. Intensive Care Med 12: 200

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Caspani ML, et al (1984) The role of total static lung compliance in the management of severe ARDS unresponsive to conventional treatment. Intensive Care Med 10: 121–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lain DC, DiBenedetto R, Morris SL, Van Nguyen A, Saulters R, Causey D (1989) Pressure control inverse ratio ventilation as a method to reduce peak inspiratory pressure and provide adequate ventilation and oxygenation. Chest 95: 1081–1088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. East TD, Böhm SH, Wallace CJ, et al (1992) A successful computerized protocol for clinical management of pressure control inverse ratio ventilation in ARDS patients. Chest 101: 697–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hickling KG (1990) Ventilatory management of ARDS: Can it affect the outcome? Intensive Care Med 16: 219–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dantzker D (1982) Gas exchange in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Chest Med 3: 57–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Bombino M, et al (1988) Relationships between lung computed tomographic density, gas exchange, and PEEP in acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology 69: 824–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lachmann B (1992) Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med 18: 319–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huygen PE, Gültuna I, Ince C, et al (1993) A new ventilation inhomogeneity index from multiple breath indicator gas washout tests in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 21: 1149–1158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mead J, Takishima T, Leith D (1970) Stress distribution in lungs: A model of pulmonary elasticity. J Appl Physiol 28: 596–608

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynolds EOR, Taghizadeh A (1974) Improved prognosis of infants mechanically ventilated for hyaline membrane disease. Arch Dis Child 49: 505–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R (1990) Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 16: 372–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Caspani ML, et al (1986) Low frequency positive-pressure ventilation with extracorporeal CO2 removal in severe acute respiratory failure. JAMA 256: 881–886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Slutsky AS (1993) Barotrauma and alveolar recruitment. Intensive Care Med 19: 369–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ackerman NB, Coalson JJ, Kuehl TJ, et al (1984) Pulmonary interstitial emphysema in the premature baboon with hyaline membrane disease. Crit Care Med 12: 512–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stocker JT (1988) Pathology of acute bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In: Bancalari A, Stocker I (eds) Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Washington, pp 237–278

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kesecioglu J, Telci L, Esen F, et al (1992) Evaluation of oxygenation with different modes of ventilation in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol 317: 901–906

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lessard M, Guerot E, Mariette C, Harf A, Lemaire F, Brochard L (1992) Pressure controlled with inverse ratio ventilation in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Intensive Care Med 18 (Supp. 2 ) 187 (Abst)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Boisante L, Curien N, Margairaz A, Bourdarias JP (1981) Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on left ventricular performance. N Engl J Med 304: 387–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinsky MR, Desmet JM, Vincent JL (1992) Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 146: 681–687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Falke KJ, Pontoppidan H, Kumar A, Leith DE, Geffin B, Laver MB (1972) Ventilation with end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease. J Clin Invest 51: 2315–2323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ellman H, Dembin H (1982) Lack of adverse hemodynamic effects of PEEP in patients with acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 10: 706–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cole AG, Weller SF, Sykes MK (1984) Inverse ratio ventilation compared with PEEP in adult respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 10: 227–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Poelaert JI, Vogelaers DP, Colardyn FA (1991) Evaluation of the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of inverse ratio ventilation with a right ventricular ejection fraction catheter. Chest 99: 1445–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kesecioglu, J., Tibboel, D., Lachmann, B. (1994). Advantages and Rationale for Pressure Controlled Ventilation. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 1994. Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 1994, vol 1994. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85068-4_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85068-4_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57613-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85068-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics