Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 464))

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

Does it apply to economics? In mathematical natural sciences, such as physics and chemistry, theoretical development has indeed been largely determined by observed facts. In economics the situation is a little different. Economics has become an influential practical science, like medicin and law. It is like medicin and law a profession, where professional solidarity plays an important role. Being a profession and a science simultaneously implies that theorizing in economics is partly determined by the general wisdom of the day, as accepted in the profession. Because of this important professional connection the basic theoretical assumptions at any given time tend to be widely accepted over most of the profession. It follows that new fundamental ideas have come slowly in economics, where theoretical foundations carry that professional responsability.

The world of observations uniquely determines the theoretical system [in mathematical sciences] … but there is no logical way leading to the fundamental laws, only intuition. (Einstein in his speech in honor to Max Planck in 1918.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Correia, I., J.Neves and S.Rebelo, Business cycles from 1850 to 1950, European Economic Review 36, 1992, p.459–467, Table 2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Samuelson, Paul and William Nordhaus,Economics,MacGraw-Hill 1985, p.771.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angus Maddison, Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, OUP 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard H.Day, Review article, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 3, 1992, p. 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Angus Maddison, Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aulin, A. (1998). The Macroeconomic Problem. In: The Impact of Science on Economic Growth and its Cycles. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 464. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95861-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95861-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64727-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95861-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics