Abstract
New or potential investigators with good research ideas often fail to take even the first step in exploring or implementing them. This usually happens when the required resources do not appear to be available. Young investigators and even mature clinicians with strong track records in teaching and service become unduly discouraged at the thought of writing a study protocol, submitting to peer appraisal, and overcoming all the real and imaginary “hurdles” associated with the preparation of grant applications.
Adapted from a paper by W.O. Spitzer published in Canadian Nurse, Volume 69, No. 3, 1973.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Apley AG. The Watson-Jones Lecture 1984: Surgeons and Writers. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1985: 67; 140–144.
Dixon J. Developing the evaluation component of a grant application. J Nurs Outlook 1982: 30; 12 2127.
Jagger J. How to write a research proposal. Grants Magazine 1980;3(41);216–222.
Skodal HW. Research proposal: the practical imagination at work. J Nurs Adm 1985: 15 (2); 5–7.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spitzer, W.O. (1986). Ten Tips on Preparing Research Proposals. In: Troidl, H., Spitzer, W.O., McPeek, B., Mulder, D.S., McKneally, M.F. (eds) Principles and Practice of Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96942-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96942-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-96944-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-96942-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive