Skip to main content

“Too Close for Comfort”: The Negative Effects of Location-Based Advertising

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. V)

Part of the book series: European Advertising Academy ((EAA,volume 5))

Abstract

The expanding presence of mobile devices offers marketers a new advertising channel for reaching consumers. Whereas both real-world practice and academia hail the advantages of personalizing advertising messages with location information, this research probes its negative effects. An exploratory field study that places ads on a social network reveals a sharp drop in advertising effectiveness when an online ad includes location information. To explain these results, a subsequent experimental study demonstrates how location-based personalization can trigger feelings of vulnerability, which hamper online advertising effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aguirre, M. E.; Mahr, D.; de Ruyter, K.; Wetzels, M. and D. Grewal (2012), “The Impact of Vul-nerability During Covert Personalization–A Regulatory Mode Approach,” Paper presented at the 41st EMAC Conference, Lisbon - ISCTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, A. and C. F. Mela (2003), “E-Customization,” in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 40, 2, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. M.; Gentry, J. W. and T. L. Rittenburg (2005), “Building Understanding of the Domain of Consumer Vulnerability,” in: Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 25, 2, 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H.; Barnes, J.; Reichardt, T. and M. Neumann (2005), “Driving Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Marketing: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Study,” in: Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 6, 3, 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellappa, R. K. and R. G. Sin (2005), “Personalization versus Privacy: An empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma,” in: Information Technology and Management, Vol. 6, 2, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. M.; Li, H. and J.-H. Lee (2002), “Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 31, 3, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eMarketer (2013), "Most Digital Ad Growth Now Goes to Mobile as Desktop Growth Falters." Retrieved January 15, 2013 from: http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Most-Digital-Ad-Growth-Now-Goes-Mobile-Desktop-Growth-Falters/1010458.

  • Gartner (2012), “Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2013.” Retrieved March 19, 2013 from: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2209615.

  • Goldfarb, A. and C. Tucker (2011), “Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness,” in: Marketing Science, Vol. 30, 3, 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, E. (2002), “M-Commerce: The Notion of Consumer Consent in Receiving Location-Based Advertising,” in: Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 1, 2, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013), “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Media-tion, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling, White paper. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.

  • Heinonen, K. (2004), “Reconceptualizing Customer Perceived Value: The Value of Time and Place,” in: Managing Service Quality, Vol. 14, 2/3, 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong Woo, J. and L. Sangmi (2007), “Mobile Media Use and its Impact on Consumer Attitudes toward Mobile Advertising,” in: International Journal of Mobile Marketing, Vol. 2, 1, 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. J. and P. W. Jessen (2010), “Profiling the Mobile Customer – Is Industry Self-Regulation Adequate to Protect Consumer Privacy when Behavioral Advertisers Target Mobile Phones?” in: Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 26, 6, 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen, M.; de Ruyter, K. and M. Wetzels (2007), “An Assessment of Value Creation in Mobile Service Delivery and the Moderating Role of Time Consciousness, “in: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 83, 1, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahr, D. and A. Lievens (2012), “Virtual Lead User Communities: Drivers of Knowledge Creation for Innovation,” in: Research Policy, Vol. 41, 1, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, S.; Ciuchita, R.; Mahr, D.; Odekerken-Schröder, G. and M. Fassnacht (2013), âUncovering Collaborative Value Creation Patterns and Establishing Corresponding Customer Roles,† in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 16, 4, 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MSI (2012), “Research Priorities 2012-2014,” Cambridge, MA. Marketing Science Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Nysveen, H.; Pedersen, P. and H. Thorbjornsen (2005), “Intentions to Use Mobile Services: Ante-cedents and Cross-Service Comparisons,” in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 33, 3, 330–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V. and S. Balasubramanian (2009), “Mobile Marketing: A Synthesis and Prognosis,” in: Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 23, 2, 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, S. B. and J. Peck (2011), “Psychological Ownership and Affective Reaction: Emotional At-tachment Process Variables and the Endowment Effect,” in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 21, 4, 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, K. Y. and S. Y. Ho (2006), “Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Infor-mation Processing and Decision Outcomes,” in: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, 4, 865–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unni, R. and R. Harmon (2007), “Perceived Effectiveness of Push vs. Pull Mobile Location-Based Advertising,” in: Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 7, 2, 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn, J. and J.C. Hoekstra (2013), “Customization of Online Advertising: The Role of Intru-siveness,” in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 24, 4, 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesanen, J. (2007), “What Is Personalization? A Conceptual Framework,” in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, 5/6, 409–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. B.; Zahay, D. L.; Thorbjørnsen, H. and S. Shavitt (2008), “Getting Too Personal: Reac-tance to Highly Personalized Email Solicitations,” in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 19, 1, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Čaić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Čaić, M., Mahr, D., Aguirre, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. (2015). “Too Close for Comfort”: The Negative Effects of Location-Based Advertising. In: Banks, I., De Pelsmacker, P., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. V). European Advertising Academy, vol 5. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08132-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics