Skip to main content

Agency and Controversy in the YouTube Community

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten

Abstract

This chapter addresses the practices of and conflicts among the core group of particularly active and sociable YouTube users who operated with a self-understanding of themselves as a ‘community’, especially in the first few years of the platform. The chapter argues that despite its internal antagonisms, it is this community of practice that provides the environment in which new literacies, new cultural forms, and new social practices – situated in and appropriate to the culture of user-created online video – were originated, adopted and retained. In order to operate effectively as a participant in the YouTube community, it is not possible to simply import learned conventions for creative practice, entertainment, or audience-building, from elsewhere. Success and cultural innovation in the early years of the platform were achieved by exploiting site-specific forms of ‘vernacular expertise’. Collectively, these particularly invested and knowledgeable users mobilised their insider knowledge in struggles over the culture of YouTube, contributing in a lasting way to its distinctive cultural forms and business logics.

This chapter is an updated and revised version of Burgess, Jean E. and Green, Joshua B. (2008) Agency and Controversy in the YouTube Community. In IR 9.0: Rethinking Communities, Rethinking Place – Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 15–18 October 2008, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Portions of the original conference paper also appear in Burgess, J. & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    5 An example of a videosharing site offering this feature is http://viddler.com.

  2. 2.

    The YouTube Stars most viewed list is available at http://www.bkserv.net/YTS/YTMostViewed.aspx.

  3. 3.

    This video has since been removed.

References

  • Banks, John, and Sal Humphreys. 2008. The labour of user co-creators: Emergent social network markets? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(4): 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1982. Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, Danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 210–230. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html. Accessed on 15.05.2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, Mark. 2007. Media work. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Martin, James Meese, Michael Arnold, Bjorn Nansen, and Marcus Carter. 2015. # Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society 18(3): 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Sal. 2005a. Productive players: Online computer games challenge to conventional media forms. Journal of Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 1(2): 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Sal. 2005b. Productive users, intellectual property and governance: The challenges of computer games. Media and Arts Law Review 10(4): 229–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarret, Kylie. 2008. Beyond broadcast yourself™: The future of YouTube. Media International Australia 126(1): 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0812600114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, Patricia G. 2007a. Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Paper presented at Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, Patricia G. 2007. Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, Mary. 2007. Online video. Pew Internet &American Life Project. 25 July. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2007/07/25/online-video/. Accessed on 21.05.2016.

  • Nightingale, Virginia. 2007. The cameraphone and online image sharing. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 21(2): 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolillo, John C. 2008. Structure and network in the YouTube core. Paper presented at 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Jason D., D. Stuart, John Hartley Cunningham, and Paul Ormerod. 2008. Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics 32(3): 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-008-9066-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Andrew. 2000. The mental labor problem. Social Text 2(18): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilt, Kristen. 2003. ‘A Little Too Ironic’: The appropriation and packaging of riot Grrrl politics by mainstream female musicians. Popular Music and Society 26(10): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terranova, Tiziana. 2000. Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text 2(18): 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, Sarah. 1996. Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, Eric. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ‘YouTube’s Greatest Hits With The Billionaire Founders’. 2007. The Oprah Winfrey Show. Available at: http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/YouTubes-Greatest-Hits. Accessed on 15.05.2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Burgess .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burgess, J., Green, J., Rebane, G. (2020). Agency and Controversy in the YouTube Community. In: Friese, H., Nolden, M., Rebane, G., Schreiter, M. (eds) Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08356-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08357-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics