Abstract
This chapter addresses the practices of and conflicts among the core group of particularly active and sociable YouTube users who operated with a self-understanding of themselves as a ‘community’, especially in the first few years of the platform. The chapter argues that despite its internal antagonisms, it is this community of practice that provides the environment in which new literacies, new cultural forms, and new social practices – situated in and appropriate to the culture of user-created online video – were originated, adopted and retained. In order to operate effectively as a participant in the YouTube community, it is not possible to simply import learned conventions for creative practice, entertainment, or audience-building, from elsewhere. Success and cultural innovation in the early years of the platform were achieved by exploiting site-specific forms of ‘vernacular expertise’. Collectively, these particularly invested and knowledgeable users mobilised their insider knowledge in struggles over the culture of YouTube, contributing in a lasting way to its distinctive cultural forms and business logics.
This chapter is an updated and revised version of Burgess, Jean E. and Green, Joshua B. (2008) Agency and Controversy in the YouTube Community. In IR 9.0: Rethinking Communities, Rethinking Place – Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 15–18 October 2008, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Portions of the original conference paper also appear in Burgess, J. & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
5 An example of a videosharing site offering this feature is http://viddler.com.
- 2.
The YouTube Stars most viewed list is available at http://www.bkserv.net/YTS/YTMostViewed.aspx.
- 3.
This video has since been removed.
References
Banks, John, and Sal Humphreys. 2008. The labour of user co-creators: Emergent social network markets? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(4): 401–418.
Becker, Howard S. 1982. Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
boyd, Danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 210–230. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html. Accessed on 15.05.2016.
Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Deuze, Mark. 2007. Media work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibbs, Martin, James Meese, Michael Arnold, Bjorn Nansen, and Marcus Carter. 2015. # Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society 18(3): 255–268.
Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Routledge.
Humphreys, Sal. 2005a. Productive players: Online computer games challenge to conventional media forms. Journal of Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 1(2): 36–50.
Humphreys, Sal. 2005b. Productive users, intellectual property and governance: The challenges of computer games. Media and Arts Law Review 10(4): 229–310.
Jarret, Kylie. 2008. Beyond broadcast yourself™: The future of YouTube. Media International Australia 126(1): 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0812600114.
Lange, Patricia G. 2007a. Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Paper presented at Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, FL.
Lange, Patricia G. 2007. Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 361–380.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Madden, Mary. 2007. Online video. Pew Internet &American Life Project. 25 July. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2007/07/25/online-video/. Accessed on 21.05.2016.
Nightingale, Virginia. 2007. The cameraphone and online image sharing. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 21(2): 289–301.
Paolillo, John C. 2008. Structure and network in the YouTube core. Paper presented at 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Potts, Jason D., D. Stuart, John Hartley Cunningham, and Paul Ormerod. 2008. Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics 32(3): 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-008-9066-y.
Ross, Andrew. 2000. The mental labor problem. Social Text 2(18): 1–31.
Schilt, Kristen. 2003. ‘A Little Too Ironic’: The appropriation and packaging of riot Grrrl politics by mainstream female musicians. Popular Music and Society 26(10): 5–16.
Terranova, Tiziana. 2000. Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text 2(18): 33–58.
Thornton, Sarah. 1996. Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.
Von Hippel, Eric. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
‘YouTube’s Greatest Hits With The Billionaire Founders’. 2007. The Oprah Winfrey Show. Available at: http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/YouTubes-Greatest-Hits. Accessed on 15.05.2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burgess, J., Green, J., Rebane, G. (2020). Agency and Controversy in the YouTube Community. In: Friese, H., Nolden, M., Rebane, G., Schreiter, M. (eds) Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08356-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08357-1
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)