Zusammenfassung
In diesem Kapitel wird ein Problem gegenwärtiger universitärer Lehramtsausbildung diskutiert. Einerseits ist die Integration unterschiedlicher Arten von Wissen (Fachwissen, fachdidaktisches Wissen sowie pädagogisches und psychologisches Wissen) ein zentraler Faktor für Entwicklung von Lehrexpertise. Andererseits wird diese Integration in der gegenwärtigen Lehramtsausbildung kaum gefördert. Es werden zwei Studien in zusammengefasster Form dargestellt, in denen zwei Arten der Förderung der Wissensintegration (hier exemplarisch fachdidaktisches Wissen einerseits sowie pädagogisches und psychologisches Wissen andererseits) untersucht wurde: Eine vorgegebene Integration, bei der die Lehrinhalte miteinander „verflochten“ werden, und eine Integration, bei der angehenden Lehrkräfte separat dargebotene Inhalte, unterstützt durch Leitfragen, selbst integrieren. Die Befunde zeigen, dass beide Maßnahmen geeignet sind, die Wissensintegration zu fördern. Diese Integration wurde jedoch mit erhöhten Lernzeitkosten erkauft. Ausgehend von diesen Befunden werden verschiedene Möglichkeiten der Wissensintegration in der universitären Lehramtsausbildung mit ihren Vor- und Nachteile diskutiert.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00029-9
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., & Wood, D. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 25-61.
Akkoç, H. (2011). Investigating the development of prospective mathematics teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 75-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.550729
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90201-3
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Anderson, L. M., Blumenfeld, P., Pintrich, P. R., Clark, C. M., Marx, R. W., & Peterson, P. (1995). Educational psychology for teachers: Reforming our courses, rethinking our roles. Educational Psychologist, 30, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3003_5
Ayres, P. (2013). Can the isolated-elements strategy be improved by targeting points of high cognitive load for additional practice? Learning and Instruction, 23, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.002
Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449-466.
Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003013
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9, 469-520.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & … Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Berliner, D. C. (1992). Telling the stories of educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 27, 143-161.
Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013247
Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473-498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026004473
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Macmillan.
Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates, and novices. Cognitive Science, 16, 153-184.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind experience, and school. Washigton, DC: National Academy Press.
Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40-87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bromme, R. (1997). Kompetenzen, Funktionen und unterrichtliches Handeln des Lehrers. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Vol. 3, pp. 177-212). Goettingen: Hogrefe.
Bromme, R. (2001). Teacher Expertise. In J.J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 15459-15465). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. W. (2009). Strategies for preparing pre-service social studies teachers to integrate technology effectively: Models and practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 46-59.
Bubrowski, A. (2007). Was ist ein guter Lehrer? Die vorläufige Top 10 der Merkmale. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://www.cjd-update.de/cjd-jugenddorf-christophorusschuleoberurff/was-ist-ein-guter-lehrer-die-vorlaeufige-top-10-der-merkmale/2007/09/28
Bullough, R. V. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: A study in the history of an idea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00022-1
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2014). Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung gestartet. Retrieved December 16, 2014, from http://www.bmbf.de/_media/press/PM0724-067.pdf
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (n.d.). Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung – ein Beitrag zu mehr Mobilität in der Lehrerschaft. Retrieved December 16, 2014, from http://www.bmbf.de/de/21697.php
Chai, C.-S., Koh, J. H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 31-51.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 17-39). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7707-6_2
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colhoun, J., Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2008). Learning abstract principles through principlecase comparison. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1659-1664). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1986). Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 279-288.
De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31, 105-113.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Duncan, A. (2009a). A call to teaching: Secretary Arne Duncan’s remarks at the rotunda at the University of Virginia. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from: http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/10/10092009.html
Duncan, A. (2009b). Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession—Remarks of Secretary Arne Duncan at Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from: http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/10/10222009.html
Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28, 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.002
Engle, R.W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211
Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits in the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fink, P.K. (1985). Control and integration of diverse knowledge in a diagnostic expert system. In A. Joshi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 426-431). Los Angeles, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz (2013). Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung. Retrieved December 16, 2014, from http://www.bmbf.de/pubRD/bund_laender_vereinbarung_qualitaetsoffensive_lehrerbildung.pdf
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393-405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Forbus, K. D. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science, 33, 1343-1382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01070.x
Geo (2012). Schule: Was ist ein guter Lehrer? Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://www.geo.de/GEO/heftreihen/geo_magazin/ebooks/was-ist-ein-guter-lehrer-geo-ebookschule-73008.html
Glaser, R. (1992). Expert knowledge and processes of thinking. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Enhancing thinking skills in the sciences and mathematics (pp. 63-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Grossman, P. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternate view on professional growth in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 62, 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062002171
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2055-2100.
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184-205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312906
Grossman, P. L., & Richert, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051x(88)90024-8
Gruber, H. (2001). Acquisition of expertise. In J. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 5145-5150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Gruber, H., Mandl, H., & Renkl, A. (2000). Was lernen wir in Schule und Hochschule: Träges Wissen? In H. Mandl & J. Gerstenmaier (Eds.), Die Kluft zwischen Wissen und Handeln: Empirische und theoretische Lösungsansätze (pp. 139-156). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hammond, T. C., & Manfra, M. M. (2009). Giving, prompting, making: Aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 160-185.
Harr, N., Eichler, A., & Renkl, A. (2014). Integrating pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical/psychological knowledge in mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00924
Harr, N., Eichler, A., & Renkl, A. (2015). Integrated learning: Ways of fostering the applicability of teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology. 6:738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00738
Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculumbased TPACK development. In C. D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education (pp. 99-108). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1984). Two courses of expertise. Research and Clinical Center for Child Development, 6, 27-36.
Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32, 26-29.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxford: Routledge.
Ishler, P. (1996). President’s message. Action in Teacher Education, 18, v–vi. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1996.10462815
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062002129
Kalyuga, S. (2008). When less is more in cognitive diagnosis: A rapid online method for diagnosing learner task-specific expertise. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.603
Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 383-408.
Kennedy, M. M., Ahn, S., & Choi, J. (2008). The value added by teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 1247-1271). New York: Routledge.
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131–152.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193, 13-19.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101-112). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49, 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W. H., & Hsieh, F. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110388664
Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M. & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 716-725.
Lagemann, E. C. (1999). Whither schools of education? Whither education research? Journal of Teacher Education, 50, 373-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719905000509
Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1993). Misconceptions and knowledge compartmentalization. In G. Strube & K. F. Wender (Eds.), The cognitive psychology of knowledge (pp. 161-176). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mayer, R.E. (Ed.) (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge. University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 34-52.
Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport des Landes Baden-Württemberg (2004). Bildungsstandards für Mathematik im Gymnasium. Retrieved November 4, 2014, from http://www.bildungstaerkt-menschen.de/service/downloads/Bildungsstandards/Gym/Gym_M_bs.pdf
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nathan, M. J., Koedinger, K. R., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Expert blind spot: When content knowledge eclipses pedagogical content knowledge. In L. Chen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 644-648). Beijing: University of Science and Technology of China Press.
Nathan, M. J., & Petrosino, A. J. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 905-928. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004905
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2013). AYA/mathematics standards. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from http://www.nbpts.org/sites/default/files/documents/certificates/NB-Standards/nbpts-certificate-aya-math-standards_10.01.13.pdf
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved May 13, 2014, from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=16909
Niess, M. L., van Zee, E. H., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2010). Knowledge growth in teaching mathematics/science with spreadsheets: Moving PCK to TPACK through online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27, 42–52.
Nolte, D. (2013). Was macht gute Lehrer aus? Bitte keine Haarbüschel in den Ohren. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/was-macht-gute-lehrer-aus-bittekeine-haarbueschel-in-den-ohren-/8175772.html
Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, T. K., Jr., & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40, 13-25.
Patel, V. L., Arocha, J. F., & Kaufman, D. R. (1999). Expertise and tacit knowledge in medicine. In R. J. Sternberg & J. A. Horvath (Eds.), Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives (pp. 75-99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Bruening, P. S., & Duffin, L. C. (2011). The role of educational psychology in teacher education: Three challenges for educational psychologists. Educational Psychologist, 46, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538648
Peters, F. (2013). Was eine Lehrerin zu einer guten Lehrerin macht. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article122231244/Was-eine-Lehrerin-zu-einerguten-Lehrerin-macht.html
Peterson, P. L., Clark, C. M., & Dickson, W. P. (1990). Educational psychology as a foundation in teacher education: Reforming an old notion. Teachers College Record, 91, 322-346.
Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91-109.
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2009). Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, & B. du Boulay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 441-448). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Reimann, P., & Rapp, A. (2008). Expertiseerwerb. In A. Renkl (Ed.), Lehrbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 155-203). Bern: Huber.
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2101_1
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by selfexplanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00030-5
Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out-example principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229-246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Renkl, A. (2014). Towards an instructionally-oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12086
Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3102_3
Rikers, R. M. J. P., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2000). Knowledge encapsulation and the intermediate effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.1000
Ross, B. H., & Kilbane, M. C. (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 427-440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.427
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00017-8
Schwonke, R., Ertelt, A., Otieno, C., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. J. C. M. (2013). Metacognitive support promotes an effective use of instructional resources in intelligent tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 23, 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.003
Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454-499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2006). Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1248
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-23.
Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 325-348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simons, P. R. J. (1999). Transfer of learning: Paradoxes for learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 577-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00025-7
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9-17.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022193728205
Tashman, L. S. (2013).The development of expertise in performance: The role of memory, knowledge, learning and practice. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5, 33-48.
Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education: In search of a new curriculum. Educational Studies, 39, 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.713548
T-Online (2013). Was macht einen guten Lehrer aus? Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://www.t-online.de/eltern/schulkind/id_43489764/lehrer-kriterien-was-macht-einen-gutenlehrer-aus.html
Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 656-661). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00642-4
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 952-969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025125
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: The Free Press. Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Educational psychology in teacher education, Educational Psychologist, 35, 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3504_04
Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112445789
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harr, N., Eichler, A., Renkl, A. (2019). Lehrexpertise – Integration und Förderung von pädagogischem und psychologischem Wissen. In: Leuders, T., Nückles, M., Mikelskis-Seifert, S., Philipp, K. (eds) Pädagogische Professionalität in Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08644-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08644-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08643-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08644-2
eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)