Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodischer Stand der Ursachenforschung und Forschungsdesign

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Warum Staaten zusammenbrechen

  • 1957 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Forschung zu den Ursachen von Staatskollaps verwendet entweder quantitative oder qualitative Methoden. Dieses Kapitel identifiziert die Schwachpunkte bisheriger Forschungsdesigns und stellt den Mehrmethodenansatz des Projekts dar. Dieses verwendet eine nested analysis, um QCA und Process-Tracing miteinander zu kombinieren. Diese Verbindung hilft insbesondere dabei, die Komplexität von Staatskollaps adäquat zu studieren und die zugrundeliegenden Kausalprozesse zu identifizieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Baker, P. H. (2006). The Conflict Assessment System Tool (CAST): An Analytical Model for Early Warning and Risk Assessment of Weak and Failing States. Washington D.C.: Fund for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. H., & Ausink, J. A. (1996). State Collapse and Ethnic Violence: Toward a Predictive Model. Parameters, 26(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. H., & Weller, A. E. (1998). An Analytical Model of Internal Conflict and State Collapse: Manual for Practitioners. Washington D.C.: Fund for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. H. (2008a). State Failure. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. H. (2008b). When Things Fell Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. (2004). Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages. In D. Sprinz & Y. Wolinsky-Namias (Hrsg.), Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations (S. 19–55). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. (2013). The mother of all isms: Causal mechanisms and structured pluralism in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Schlosser, D. (2003). Makro-qualitative vergleichende Methoden. In D. Berg-Schlosser & F. Müller-Rommel (Hrsg.), Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft: Ein einführendes Studienhandbuch (4 Aufl., S. 103–125). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke, F. S. (2012). Zuverlässig invalide – Indizes zur Messung fragiler Staatlichkeit. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 6(1), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büttner, A. (2004). Staatszerfall als neues Phänomen der internationalen Politik: Theoretische Kategorisierung und empirische Überprüfung. Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, C. T. (2011). Beyond the “Failed State”: Toward Conceptual Alternatives. European Journal of International Relations, 17(2), 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carment, D., Prest, S., Gazo, J. J., El-Achkar, S., & Samy, Y. (2006). Failed and Fragile States 2006: A Briefing Note for the Canadian Government. Country Indicators for Foreign Policy Project, Carleton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carment, D., Samy, Y., & Prest, S. (2008). State Fragility and Implications for Aid Allocation: An Empirical Analysis. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(4), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, C. (2004). State Collapse: A Common Causal Pattern? A comparative analysis of Lebanon, Somalia, and the Former-Yugoslavia. Louvain: Department of Political and Social Sciences, Catholic University of Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronqvist, L. (2007). Konfigurationelle Analyse mit Multi-Value QCA als Methode der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft mit einem Fallbeispiel aus der Vergleichenden Parteienforschung (Erfolg Grüner Parteien in den achtziger Jahren). Dissertation zum Dr. rer. pol., Philipps-Universität Marburg, from http://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2007/0620/.

  • Cronqvist, L., & Berg-Schlosser, D. (2009). Multi-Value QCA (mvQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Hrsg.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (S. 69–86). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Englehart, N. A. (2007). Governments Against States: The Logic of Self-Destructive Despotism. International Political Science Review, 28(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englehart, N. A., & Simon, M. V. (2009). Failing States and Failing Regimes: The Prediction and Simulation of State Failure. In H. Starr (Hrsg.), Dealing with Failed States: Crossing Analytic Boundaries (S. 108–127). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. C., Goldstone, J. A., Gurr, T. R., Surko, P. T., & Unger, A. N. (1995). State Failure Task Force Report. McLean: Science Applications International Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falleti, T. G., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(9), 1143–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is Governance? (Bd. 314). Washington D.C.: Center for Global Development. Fund for Peace. (2005). The Failed States Index 2005. Foreign Policy(149), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L. (1979). Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison. In P. G. Lauren (Hrsg.), Diplomacy: New approaches in History, Theory, and Policy (S. 43–68). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2010). Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But… Comparative Political Studies, 43(11), 1499–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (2008). Pathways to State Failure. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(4), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A., Bates, R. H., Gurr, T. R., Lustik, M., Marshall, M. G., Ulfelder, J., & Woodward, M. (2005). A Global Forecasting Model of Political Instability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grävingholt, J., Ziaja, S., & Kreibaum, M. (2012). State Fragility: Towards a Multi-Dimensional Empirical Typology. Discussion Paper Nr. 3/2012. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, A. M., & Cronqvist, L. (2009). When dichotomisation becomes a problem for the analysis of middle-sized datasets. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal, Z., & Starr, H. (2007). State Failure: Conceptualization and Determinants. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Interational Studies Association, Chicago, 28. Februar – 2. März 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambach, D. (2009). Warum kollabieren Staaten? In M. Bussmann, A. Hasenclever, & G. Schneider (Hrsg.), Identität, Institutionen und Ökonomie: Ursachen innenpolitischer Gewalt. Sonderheft 43/2009 der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift (S. 235–257). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambach, D., & Gamberger, D. (2008). A Temporal Analysis of Political Instability Through Subgroup Discovery. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauth, H.-J., Pickel, G., & Pickel, S. (2009). Methoden der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuffen, D. (2007). Fallauswahl in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. In T. Gschwend & F. Schimmelfennig (Hrsg.), Forschungsdesign in der Politikwissenschaft. Probleme – Strategien – Anwendungen (S. 201–222). Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and Conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(4), 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2010). After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research. World Politics, 62(1), 120–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. E. (2012). Estimating State Instability. Studies in Intelligence, 56(1), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. G., & Cole, B. R. (2008). Global Report on Conflict, Governance, and State Fragility 2008. Foreign Policy Bulletin, 18(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. G., & Goldstone, J. (2007). Global Report on Conflict, Governance, and State Fragility 2007: Gauging System Performance and Fragility in the Globalization Era. Foreign Policy Bulletin, 17(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2005). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2004– Dataset Users’ Manual. Arlington: George Mason University, Polity IV Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, A., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2013). The origins, development, and application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: the first 25 years. European Political Science Review, FirstView, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2009). Sozialwissenschaftliches Erklären: Probleme der Theoriebildung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. J., & Miskel, J. F. (1997). Spotting Trouble: Identifying Faltering and Failing States. Naval War College Review, 50(2), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. E., & Patrick, S. (2008). Index of State Weakness in the Developing World. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research. International Sociology, 21(5), 679–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. (2013). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), Anno 2013: Reframing The Comparative Method’s Seminal Statements. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(2), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B., & De Meur, G. (2009). Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Hrsg.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (S. 33–68). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. I. (2004). The Failure and Collapse of Nation-States: Breakdown, Prevention, and Repair. In R. I. Rotberg (Hrsg.), When States Fail: Causes and Consequences (S. 1–49). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. I. (Hrsg.). (2003). State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener, U. (2006a). Charakteristika und Dynamiken fragiler Staatlichkeit – Zur Auswertung der Fallstudien. In U. Schneckener (Hrsg.), Fragile Staatlichkeit: „States at Risk“ zwischen Stabilität und Scheitern (S. 347–366). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener, U. (2006b). States at Risk: Zur Analyse fragiler Staatlichkeit. In U. Schneckener (Hrsg.), Fragile Staatlichkeit: „States at Risk“ zwischen Stabilität und Scheitern (S. 9–40). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener, U. (Hrsg.). (2006c). Fragile Staatlichkeit: „States at Risk“ zwischen Stabilität und Scheitern. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. Q., & Rohlfing, I. (2013). Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research. Sociological Methods & Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, U.-M. (2005). Staatszerfall als Problem des internationalen Systems. Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßner, A., & Klein, M. (Hrsg.). (2007). Wenn Staaten scheitern: Theorie und Empirie des Staatszerfalls. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetzlaff, R. (2002). Die Staaten Afrikas zwischen demokratischer Konsolidierung und Staatszerfall. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte(13–14/2002), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagemann, C., & Schneider, C. Q. (2010). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets: Agenda for a Research Approach and a Data Analysis Technique. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 376–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W. (Hrsg.). (1995). Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Deutschland

    Daniel Lambach

  2. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland

    Eva Johais

  3. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Deutschland

    Markus Bayer

Authors
  1. Daniel Lambach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eva Johais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markus Bayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Lambach .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lambach, D., Johais, E., Bayer, M. (2016). Methodischer Stand der Ursachenforschung und Forschungsdesign. In: Warum Staaten zusammenbrechen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11823-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11823-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11822-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11823-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation