Abstract
Constitutional politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina are dominated by ethno-politics and the results of the 1992–1995 war. The constitution contained in the Dayton peace agreement of 1995 established a stable but inefficient consociational arrangement based on an ethno-territorial division of the country with particular rights for the three constituent peoples: Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs. In 2009, the European Court of Human Rights found that the constitution discriminates citizens who do not claim to belong to any of these constituent peoples. Furthermore, the European Union established constitutional reform as a precondition for Bosnia and Herzegovina’s further EU integration. However, the political representatives of the constituent peoples have resisted any calls for change so far.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All people and persons coming from Bosnia and Herzegovina are being referred to as Bosnians (Bosanac), regardless of their ethnicity and which part of the country they come from. The 1991 census included the category ‘Muslim’ in a national sense, although not all ‘Muslims’ were of Islamic faith. Nevertheless, nationality and religion are highly interlinked as also most Croats are of Roman Catholic and most Serbs of Christian Orthodox faith. As of 1993, the term ‘Bosniak’ (Bošnjak) replaced the term ‘Muslim’.
- 2.
The constitution was drafted in English by a mixed team of domestic and international experts. The text was later translated into the languages of BiH as listed in the GFAP, i.e. Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian.
- 3.
The original term Republika Srpska (in English: ‘Serb Republic’) will be used here as the original name is used also in the GFAP and has become internationally accepted and turned into common usage (see e.g. Steiner and Ademović 2010).
- 4.
I use the—admittedly ambiguous—term ‘international community’ to refer to a rather stable group of states and international organizations with a stake in the peace agreement and the further development of BiH. With regard to constitutional politics, it includes the countries and organizations represented in the Peace Implementation Council supporting the Office of the High Representative, in particular the European Union and its member states, the USA, the Russian Federation, Canada, the NATO, and the Organization of Islamic States (see Peace Implementation Council 2012).
- 5.
For the cantons Herzegovina-Neretva (Mostar) and Central Bosnia (Travnik), where most of the fighting took place, power-sharing was agreed.
- 6.
For a comprehensive analysis of blocking mechanisms, see Bahtić-Kunrath (2011).
- 7.
In the meantime, negotiations with the EU for a Stabilization and Association Agreement had begun on November 25, 2005.
- 8.
The request for judicial autonomy had been an important feature since Yugoslav times. In the case of the RS, there are particularly concerns that the State Court could trial RS politicians for corruption while they feel protected at RS level given their control over the political and judicial system.
- 9.
I.e. up until the finalization of this chapter in September 2015.
References
Anderson, George, and Sujit Choudhry. 2015. Constitutional transitions and territorial cleavages. Stockholm: IDEA.
Andjelic, Neven. 2003. Bosnia-Herzegovina. The end of a legacy. London: Cass.
Arsenijević, Damir (ed.). 2015. Unbribable Bosnia and Herzegovina. The fight for the commons. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Bahtić-Kunrath, Birgit. 2011. Of Veto players and entity-voting: Institutional gridlock in the Bosnian reform process. Nationalities Papers 39(6): 899–923.
Calic, Marie-Janine. 1996. Krieg und Frieden in Bosnien und Herzegowina, 2nd ed. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Calic, Marie-Janine. 2011. The beginning of the end. The 1970s as a historical turning point in Yugoslavia. In The crisis of socialist modernity. The Soviet Union and Yugoslavia in the 1970s, ed. Marie-Janine Calic, Dieter Neutatz, and Julia Obertreis, 66–86. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Flessenkemper, Tobias, and Tobias Bütow. 2011. Building and removing visa walls. On European integration of the Western Balkans. Security and Peace 29(3): 162–168.
Flessenkemper, Tobias. 2012. Bosnien und Herzegowina und die Europäische Union. 20 schwierige Jahre. Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 52(2): 46–65.
Gavrić, Saša, and Damir Banović. 2010. Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Procedures, challenges, recommendations. Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 50(1): 60–75.
Glaurdić, Josip. 2011. The hour of Europe: Western powers and the breakup of Yugoslavia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hays, Don, and Jason Crosby. 2006. From Dayton to Brussels.Constitutional preparations for Bosnia’s EU accession. United States Institute for Peace: Washington.
Hoare, Marko-Attila. 2007. History of Bosnia and Herzegowina. From the middle ages to the present day. London: Saqi Books.
Holbrooke, Richard. 1998. To end a war. New York: Random House.
International Crisis Group. 2014. Bosnia’s Future. Europe Report No. 232 (10 July 2014). Brussels: International Crisis Group. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/balkans/bosnia-herzegovina/232-bosnia-s-future.pdf (accessed September 14, 2015).
Katz, Vera. 2010. Parliamentarism in Bosnia and herzegovina in conditions of political pluralism (1990–1995). https://www.parlament.ba/istorija/default.aspx?id=27926&langTag=en-US&pril=b (accessed September 14, 2015).
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Marko, Joseph. 2006. Constitutional reform in Bosnia and herzegovina 2005–2006. European Yearbook of Minority Issues 5: 207–218.
Mujkić, Asim. 2007. Mi, građani etnopolisa. Sarajevo: Šahinpašić.
Ó Tuathail, Gearóid, John O’Loughlin, and Dino Djipa. 2006. Bosnia-herzegovina ten years after Dayton: Constitutional change and public opinion. Eurasian Geography and Economics 47(1): 61–75.
Offe, Claus. 1991. Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Social Research 58: 865–892.
Perry, Valerie. 2015. Not-so-great expectations. The EU and the constitutional politics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In The EU and member state building. European foreign policy in the Western Balkans, ed. Soeren Keil, and Zeynep Arkan, 163–187. Milton Park: Routledge.
Steiner, Christian, and Nedim Ademović. 2010. Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung: Commentary. Sarajevo.
Toal, Gerard, and Carl T. Dahlman. 2011. Bosnia Remade. Ethnic cleansing and its reversal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tolksdorf, Dominik. 2012. Die EU und Bosnien-Herzegowina. Außenpolitik auf der Suche nach Kohärenz. Nomos: Baden-Baden.
Sources
Bosnia and Herzegovina. 1995. Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina of December 14, 1995. http://www.ccbh.ba/public/down/USTAV_BOSNE_I_HERCEGOVINE_engl.pdf (accessed August 11, 2015).
Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2009. Amendment I to the constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. http://www.ccbh.ba/public/down/Amendment_I_to_the_Constitution_of_BiH_(OHR_and_CC).pdf (accessed August 11, 2015).
Constitutional Court. 2000. Decision No. U 5/2000. Sarajevo, September 29. http://www.ccbh.ba/eng/odluke/povuci_pdf.php?pid=22384 (accessed September 14, 2015).
Council of the European Union. 2011. Conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina, Foreign Affairs Council, 3076th meeting, Brussels, 21 March 2011.
Council of the European Union. 2015. Conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina, Foreign Affairs Council, 3379th meeting, Brussels, 16 March 2015.
European Commission. 2014. Bosnia and Herzegovina progress report. SWD(2014)305final. Brussels, October 8. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008-bosnia-and-herzegovina-progress-report_en.pdf (accessed September 14, 2015).
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). 2005. Opinion on the constitutional situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Powers of the high representative, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 62nd plenary session (Venice, 11–12 March 2005). CDL-AD(2005)004-e. Venice, March 11 http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2005)004-e (accessed September 14, 2015).
European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber. 2009. Case of Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Applications nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06). Judgment. Strasbourg, December 22. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96491#{“itemid”:[“001-96491“]} (accessed September 14, 2015).
GFAP. 1995. General framework agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Paris, December 14. http://www.ucdp.uu.se/gpdatabase/peace/BoH%2019951121.pdf (accessed September 14, 2015).
Hahn, Johannes. 2014. European neighbourhood policy and enlargement negotiation. Opening Speech at the European Policy Centre. Brussels, December 3. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-2352_en.htm (accessed September 14, 2015).
Peace Implementation Council. 2008. Communiqué of the steering board of the peace implementation council. n.p., June 25. http://www.ohr.int/pic/default.asp?content_id=41874 (accessed September 14, 2015).
Peace Implementation Council. 2009. Communique of the steering board of the peace implementation Council. n.p., March 26. http://www.ohr.int/pic/default.asp?content_id=43264 (accessed September 14, 2015).
Peace Implementation Council. 2012. The peace implementation council and its steering board. n.p., February 16. http://www.ohr.int/pic/default.asp?content_id=38563 (accessed September 14, 2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Constitutional Politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1995–2014
Appendix: Constitutional Politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1995–2014
Dates of amendment and implementation | Articles | Constitutional subfields | Short analysis of the reform process |
---|---|---|---|
03/26/2009/ 04/08/2009 | Art. VI | • Constitutional court • Local self-administration | • Regular amendment by Parliamentary Assembly with broad two-thirds majorities in the House of Representatives (final vote: 36-to-1 majority with 2 abstentions) and the House of Peoples (final vote: 14-to-1 majority without abstentions) • Main actors: all political parties, High Representative • Duration: 6 months. |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Flessenkemper, T. (2016). Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Fruhstorfer, A., Hein, M. (eds) Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13762-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13762-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-13761-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-13762-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)