Abstract
An ethical dilemma occurs when two values are in opposition. One that arises in the context of professional practice has the potential to create a division among a profession’s membership. This division in membership can lead to factionalism, which in turn may weaken the effectiveness of the affected profession. In the United States, the Library and Information Science (LIS) profession is host to a long-standing division between supporters of social responsibility and of library neutrality. This essay offers a virtue ethics approach as a framework to accommodate both values. Successful accommodation of both would promote greater professional coherence and simplify the ethical decision making processes of LIS practitioners. This chapter centers on a discussion of contemporary ethical crises that illustrate the social responsibility/library neutrality division and is a consideration of how a virtue ethics approach would facilitate using both core ethical concepts to address these crises in ways that are mutually compatible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott, A. (1998). Professionalism and the future of librarianship. Library Trends, 46(3), 430–443.
American Library Association. (2004). Core values of librarianship: Advocacy, legislation & issues. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/statementspols/corevalues
American Library Association. (2008). Code of ethics of the American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/proethics/codeofethics/codeethics
American Library Association. (2013). A.1 mission, priority areas, goals (old number 1): About ALA. http://www.ala.org/aboutala/governance/policymanual/updated policymanual/section1/1mission
American Library Association. (2014). About SRRT | Social responsibilities round table (SRRT). http://www.ala.org/srrt/about-srrt
American Library Association. (2015). Intellectual freedom and censorship Q & A: Advocacy, legislation & issues. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/censorshipfirstamendmentissues/ifcensorshipqanda
Budd, J. (2008). Self-examination: The present and future of librarianship. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
Butler, P. (1951). Librarianship as a profession. The Library Quarterly, 21(4), 235–247. doi: 10.2307/4304047
Capurro, R. (2008). Intercultural information ethics. In K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 639-665). New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Dilevko, J. (2009). The Politics of professionalism: A retro-progressive proposal for librarianship. Sacramento, CA: Library Juice Press, LLC.
Hjørland, B. (2000). Library and information science: Practice, theory, and philosophical basis. Information Processing & Management, 36(3), 501–531.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
IFLA Committee on Freedom of Access to Information and Freedom of Expression. (2012). IFLA code of ethics for librarians and other information workers (full version). http://www.ifla.org/news/ifla-code-of-ethics-for-librarians-and-other-information-workers-full-version
IFLA Headquarters. (2015). Annual report 2012-2013: IFLA - the global voice of libraries. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations.
Jones, B. (2005). Revitalizing theory in library and information science: The contribution of process philosophy. The Library Quarterly, 75(2), 101–121. doi.org/10.1086/431329
Kagan, A. (2005). IFLA and social responsibility: A core value of librarianship. Libraries, National Security, Freedom of Information Laws and Social Responsibilities: IFLA/FAIFE World Report, 33–43.
Koehler, W. (2003). Professional values and ethics as defined by “the LIS discipline.” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 44(2), 99–119.
Larson, M. (1979). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Nardi, B., & O’Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Osburn, C. (2009). The social transcript : Uncovering library philosophy. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Pawley, C. (1998). Hegemony’s handmaid? The library and information studies curriculum from a class perspective. The Library Quarterly, 68(2), 123–144.
Preer, J. (2008). Library ethics. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Samek, T. (2001). Intellectual freedom and social responsibility in American librarianship, 1967-1974. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co Inc Pub.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burgess, J.T.F. (2016). Reconciling Social Responsibility and Neutrality in LIS Professional Ethics: A Virtue Ethics Approach. In: Kelly, M., Bielby, J. (eds) Information Cultures in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14679-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14681-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)