Skip to main content

The Role of Monitoring Spatio-Temporal Change in Achieving Resilience of the Suburban Landscape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Regions Now & Tomorrow

Part of the book series: Studien zur Resilienzforschung ((STRE))

  • 724 Accesses

Abstract

A city is a constructed landscape which epitomizes human intelligence and creativity, depicts social, cultural and economic development and still remains the most favorable and important habitat for the human species. Cities continue to grow, yet covering only about 3% of the earth’s surface, causing major negative impacts to the environment such as the natural resources depletion, carbon emissions, pollution of ground water, etc. A resilient city is a flexible, adaptable to change organism which comes in a form of equilibrium to meet quality criteria of living. Change is always reflected in form. The hypothesis of this study is whether monitoring of spatio-temporal landscape change is an important method in examining landscape resilience. It focuses mainly on the notions of transformation, time and process using the principles of landscape ecology, in order to capture the way a landscape may respond to environmental, social and economic change. A relative research presented hereby was conducted between 2010 and 2012 and included the study of the spatio-temporal change in the suburban landscape east of the city of Thessaloniki, an area of approximately 10 K hectares. Results demonstrated change in LULC patterns of thirteen (13) different land use/cover types and the transformation of a once arable agricultural landscape into a suburban landscape with mixed residential and agricultural uses. Socio-economic and ecological factors influenced this drastic change in structure and function of the landscape in study. The study concludes that monitoring spatio-temporal landscape change contributes in examining the potentially of a landscape towards resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Urban projects under the resilience platform like ‘TURAS’ (Transitioning towards Urban Resilience and Sustainability) and ‘100 Resilient Cities’ recognize common threats in cities and via a creation of a network, information is circulated and cities can learn from each other. In 100 Resilient Cities the capacity to strengthen the city’s living conditions explores not only the physical vulnerability of some cities i.e. New Orleans’ and Byblos’ exposure to hurricane, typhoon, cyclone, but also social problems like inequity, which is apparent in Medellín, Colombia. For 100 Resilient Cities, 36 ‘resilient challenges’ were identified. These are: aging infrastructure, chronic energy shortages, declining of aging population, depletion of natural resources, disease outbreak, drought, earthquake, economic shifts, endemic crime and violence, epidemic of drugs and alcohol abuse, flooding (coastal and rainfall), food shortage, hazardous materials accident, heat wave, high unemployment, hurricane, typhoon, cyclone, infrastructure failure, insufficient educational infrastructure, intractable homelessness, lack of affordable housing, landslide, overpopulation, pollution or environmental degradation, poor health infrastructure, poor transportation system, rapid growth, refugees, resource scarcity, riot or civil unrest, rising sea level and coastal erosion, social inequity, terrorism, tropical storms, tsunami, volcanic activity and wildfires. In TURAS, the challenge is focused in the acknowledgement that ‘Many urban areas are vulnerable to gradual environmental change and many city dwellers are concerned with the impacts of rapid or unregulated land use change, environmental health and human well-being’ (http://www.turas-cities.org/challenges).

  2. 2.

    Leon C. Megginson, a Louisiana State University business professor gave a speech at the convention of the Southwestern Social Science Association in 1963 where he presented his own idiosyncratic interpretation of the central idea outlined in Darwin’s ‘On the Origin of Species’, yet as in many cases, it is believed that over time Megginson’s remarks were streamlined and reassigned directly to Charles Darwin. Source: http://quoteinvestigator.com/2014/05/04/adapt/.

  3. 3.

    She entitles here article in Topos Magazine 90, ‘Resilience: Designing the New Sustainability’. (https://www.toposmagazine.com/topos-90-resilient-cities-and-landscapes/#!/foto-post-1219-3).

  4. 4.

    Resources which cause species to compete in the suburban landscape are land, water, energy and others.

  5. 5.

    Competition as a law of nature is defined as the interaction between two organisms which occurs in their attempt to possess/attain a resource which is important for both species, this resource is either abundant or rare, yet in the attempt of having it or using it, the one species effects unfavorably the other one (Birch 1957; Krebs 1972 in Gerakis 1975).

  6. 6.

    An ecotone is a transition area between two biomes, it is where two communities meet and integrate. An ecotone may appear on the ground as a gradual blending of the two communities across a broad area, or it may manifest itself as a sharp boundary line. The word ecotone was coined from the two word eco and tone, from the greek tonos or tension. McCay (2000) has discussed the diverse and productive nature of edges, proposing that the edge effect may be used as a metaphor for the bringing together of people, ideas and institutions. Turner et al. (2003) suggests that ‘cultural edges’, rather than being border zones between discrete social entities, are zones of social interaction, cross-fertilization, and synergy wherein people not only exchange material goods but also learn from one another and support that ‘key to the maintenance of resilience is the presence of diversity, which, as we will argue, is often found to be at its greatest in ecological and cultural edge situations’.

  7. 7.

    Types 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 10 and 13 appear in CORINE land cover. Type 11 is a combination of CORINE land cover 3.2 and 3.3 categories and type 12 of various categories. Types 4, 5, 7, 8 and 12 are unique to this study.

  8. 8.

    Or more actually a Triangular Irregual Network-TIN was superimposed on top of the maps (ArcToolBox → 3d Analyst Tools → Tin management → Create Tin).

  9. 9.

    The suburban forest of ‘Seih-Sou’ was planted in the 1930s with pines. During digitalization, in the landscape of 1945 these planted areas fell under the category ‘mixed forest, semi-natural areas’.

  10. 10.

    Values for individual urban growth forms in 2007–2009 are: ‘continuous urban fabric’ = 7,7%, ‘discontinuous urban fabric’ 16.5%, ‘road and rail networks’ 2.6%, ‘house/buildings with outdoor vegetated or bare ground’ 8.1%, ‘houses with olive/fruit groves’ 0.65%.

References

  • Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience, 53(12), 1169–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anguilera, F., Valenzuela, L. M., & Botequilha-Leitão, A. (2011). Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99, 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M. (2001). The language of landscape ecologists and planners. A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M., & van Eetvelde, V. (2000). Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: Visual image Interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiadou, E. A. (2012). Landscape architecture’s contribution to sustainable development: Landscape planning and landscape ecology principles applied in a suburban mediterranean landscape, east of Thessaloniki, Northern Greece. PhD thesis, Joint Postgraduate Studies Landscape Architecture, School of Architecture & School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Başkent, E. Z., & Kadioğullari, A. I. (2007). Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in Turkey: A case study in İnegöl. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, L. C. (1957). The meanings of competition. The American Naturalist, 91, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botequilha Leitão, A., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botequilha Leitao, Α., Miller, J., Ahern, J., & McGarigal, K. (2006). Measuring landscapes: A planner’s handbook. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, J. (2004). Landscape urbanism. In: M. Mostafavi & C. Najle (Eds.), Landscape urbanism: A manual for the machinic landscape. AA

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak, J. (2007). Legibility and resilience. In J. Czerniak & G. Hargreaves (Eds.), Large parks (pp. 215–251). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad, W. E., Olson, J. D., & Forman, T. R. R. (1996). Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land use planning. Harvard University: Graduate School of Design. Island Press & American Society of Landscape Architects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau, K., & Eurostat (under the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD) (2002). Pais: Proposal on Indicators for landscapes, agricultural practices and rural development at EU level-Phase I. National Accounts. Statistics Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land Mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerakis P. A. (1975). Lessons in ecology. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, F., & Nakagoshi, N. (2006). Spatial-temporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. (1972). Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister N.-M. (2015). Resilience: Designing the new sustainability. Topos Magazine 90. https://www.toposmagazine.com/topos-90-resilient-cities-and-landscapes/#!/foto-post-1219-3

  • McCay, B. (2000). Edges, fields and regions. The Common Property Resource Digest, 54, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, L. C. (1963). Lessons from Europe for American Business. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 44(1). http://quoteinvestigator.com/2014/05/04/adapt/

  • Naveh, Z., & Lieberman, A. (1990). Landscape ecology. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z. (2007). Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecology, 22, 1437–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1971). Fundamentals in ecology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings, Ch. (1998). Resilience in the dynamics of economy-environment systems. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, H. M., Yamaguchi, Y., & Bui, Q. T. (2011). A case study on the relation between city planning and urban growth using remote sensing and spatial metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307, 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodiek, J. E. (2004). Landscape planning: Its contributions to the evolution of the profession of landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning., 76, 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tratsela, M. (2011). Landscape architecture in Thessaloniki: The role of temporality in landscape design. PhD Thesis. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Department of Architecture, School of Engineering (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N. J., Davidson-Huny, I. J., & O’Flaherty, M. (2003). Living on the edge: Ecological and cultural edges as sources of diversity for social-ecological resilience. Human Ecology, 31(3), 439–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Jenerette, G., Buyantuyev, A., & Redman, C. (2011). Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: The case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecological Complexity, 8(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleni A. Athanasiadou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Athanasiadou, E.A., Tratsela, M. (2017). The Role of Monitoring Spatio-Temporal Change in Achieving Resilience of the Suburban Landscape. In: Deppisch, S. (eds) Urban Regions Now & Tomorrow. Studien zur Resilienzforschung. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16759-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics