Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sozialwirtschaftliche Regie im ostasiatischen Bezugsrahmen

Eine komparative Studie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aktuelle Diskurse in der Sozialwirtschaft I

Part of the book series: Perspektiven Sozialwirtschaft und Sozialmanagement ((PSOSO))

Zusammenfassung

Das Soziale lässt sich kulturabhängig unterschiedlich „regieren“ und danach auch unterschiedlich „bewirtschaften“. In den letzten Jahrzehnten entwickeln sich in Ostasien Formen eines Wohlfahrtsregimes, das nicht zuletzt auf konfuzianischen Verbindlichkeiten fußt. Beobachtet wird die Durchdringung von familialem Selbstunterhalt und staatlich gelenkter Sozialwirtschaft, wie sie sich in besonderer Weise in Südkorea vollzieht. Die sozialwirtschaftliche Steuerung ist hier und generell in Ostasien Teil der ökonomischen Entwicklungsstrategie im gesellschaftlichen Wandel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aspalter, C. (2006). The East Asian Welfare Model. In International Journal of Social Welfare 4, 290 – 301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. A., & Hahm, C. (Hrsg.) (2003). Confucianism for the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidet, E., & Eum, H. (2015). Social Enterprise in South Korea: General Presentation of the Phenomenon. Liege: ICSEM Working Papers No. 06

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhölzer, K., Klein, A., Zimmer, A., & Priller, E. (Hrsg.) (2005). Dritter Sektor/Drittes system. Theorie, Funktionswandel und zivilgesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2008). Chinese Visions of World Order. Post-Hegemonic or a New Hegemony? In International Studies Review 10, 749 – 761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Raymond K. H. (2013). The Welfare-Work Nexus in East Asia – A Comparison of Contexts, Paths and Directions. In Journal of East Asian Public Policy 1, 99 – 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T., & Selden, M. (1994). The Origins and Consequences of China’s Hokou System. In The China Quarterly 139, 664 – 668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.-C., & Kim, K. (2003). A Conceptual Exploration of the Korean Self in Comparison with the Western Self. In K.-D. Yang, K.-K. Hwang, P. A. Petersen, I. Daibo (Hrsg.), Progress in Asian Social Psychology. Conceptual and Empirical Contributions (S. 29 – 42). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. J. (2012). End of the Era of Productivist Welfare Capitalism? Diverging Welfare Regimes in East Asia. In Asian Journal of Social Science 40, 275 – 294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, V., & Wellman, B. (2015). Social Networks in East and Southeast Asia 1: National Characteristics, Institutions, Network Capital, and Guanxi. In American Behavioral Scientist 8, 903 – 913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2004). Die gute Gesellschaft und der neue Wohlfahrtsstaat. In Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 1-2, 189 – 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (2005). Japan’s homeless people as an issue of local and central governance. In G. D. Hook (Hrsg.), Contested Governance in Japan. Sides and Issues (S. 192 – 210). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. (Hrsg.) (2002). Social Connections in China. Institutions, Culture, and the changing Nature of Guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R., White, G., & Kwon, H-j. (Hrsg.) (1998). The East Asian Welfare Model. Welfare Orientalism and the State. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSEF Social Economy Policy Guide Book – Seoul Metropolitan Government (2016). Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul – A Case Study of Seoul. Seoul: Global Social Economy Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist Welfare Capitalism. Social Policy in East Asia. In Political Studies 4, 706 – 723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, I., & Wilding, P. (Hrsg.) (2004). Welfare Capitalism in East Asia. Social Policies in the Tiger Economies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, G. D. (Hrsg.) (2005). Contested Governance in Japan. Sides and Issues. Abingdon: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak, S. (2014). Antecedents and characteristics of informal relation-based networks in Korea: Yongo, Yonjul and Inmaek. In Asia Pacific Business Review 1, 78 – 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J., & Kühner, S. (2012). Analyzing the Productive and Protective Dimensions of Welfare: Looking Beyond the OECD. In Social Policy & Administration 1, 35 – 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J., Kühner, S., & Yang, N. (2014). Productive Welfare, the East Asian ‚Model‘ and beyond: Placing Welfare Types in Greater China into Context. In Social Policy and Society 2, 301 – 315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J., Jo, N. K., & Keung, A. (2015). Culture and the Politics of Welfare. Exploring Societal Values and Social Choices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G-J. (Hrsg.) (2011). New Welfare States in East Asia. Global Challenges and Restructuring. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G.-J. (2006). Pathways to State Welfare in Korea. Interests, Ideas and Institutions. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, M. (2012). When China Rules the World. Second edition. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, J. Y. (2010). Korea’s National Basic Livelihood Programme and Social Development. In J. Midgley & K.-l. Tang (Hrsg.), Social Policy and Poverty in East Asia. The Role of Social Security (S. 81 – 98). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1990). Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan: oikonomic welfare states. In Government and Opposition 4, 446 – 462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1993). The Pacific challenge. Confucian welfare states. In C. Jones (Hrsg.), New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe (S. 184 – 202). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K. (2016). Government-driven social enterprises in South Korea: Lessons from the Social Enterprise Promotion Program in the Seoul Metropolitan Government. In International Review of Administrative Sciences 3, 598 – 616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D., & Park, C.-u. (2013). A New Direction in the Welfare-Work-Nexus in South Korea. In Journal of East Asian Public Policy 1, 60 – 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasza, G. J. (2006). One World of Welfare. Japan in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. (2001). Familie und soziale Netzwerke. Eine komparative Analyse persönlicher Beziehungen in Deutschland und Südkorea. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-J. (written by Office of the President, Republic of Korea, Presidential Comittee for Quality-of-Life) (2000). DJ Welfarism. A New Paradigm for Productive Welfare in Korea. Seoul: Tae Sul Dang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Mason M. S. (2015). Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia. Productivist Models of Social Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. S. (2006). Institutionalisierung eines neuen Wohlfahrtsstaates in Ostasien? Eine Fallstudie über Südkorea. Diss. Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. S. (2008). Die Entstehung „neuer Wohlfahrtsstaaten“ und globale Policy-Diffusion – das Beispiel Südkorea. In Zeitschrift für Soziologie 3, 186 – 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-H. (2003). Productive Welfare: Korea’s third way? In International Journal of Social Welfare 1, 61 – 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-T., & Han-Broich, M. (2017a). Der Wohlfahrtsstaat in Südkorea. Historische Entwicklung und Ausblick (Teil 1). In Soziale Arbeit (DZI) 2, 60 – 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-T., & Han-Broich, M. (2017b). Der Wohlfahrtsstaat in Südkorea. Historische Entwicklung und Ausblick (Teil 2). In Soziale Arbeit (DZI) 3, 103 – 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H.-j. (1999). The Welfare State in Korea. The Politics of Legitimation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H.-j. (Hrsg.) (2005). Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-M. (2006). Das soziale Wohlfahrtssystem der Senioren und die Lebenssituation älterer Menschen in Korea. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Byeon, J. (2014). Evaluation and Reform of Self-Sufficiency Project in Korea. In Asian Journal of Human Services 1, 13 – 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J., & Ku, Y.-W. (2007). East Asian Welfare Regimes: Testing the Hypothesis of the Developmental Welfare States. In Social Policy & Administration 2, 197 – 212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Joe C. B., & Xu, Y. (2015). China’s Social Welfare. The Third Turning Point. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. H., & Endo, C. (2016). The development of the social economy in the welfare mix: Political dynamics between the state and the third sector. In The Social Science Journal 53, 486 – 494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mseshima, I. (1964). Familiensystem und Arbeitsverhältnisse in Japan und das Problem familienhafter Ordnung im Betrieb. In Jahrbuch für christliche Sozialwissenschaften, Bd. 5 (S. 211 – 238).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, R., Kuhnle, S., Gilbert, N., & Chung, K. (Hrsg.) (2004). Modernizing the Korean Welfare State. Towards the Productive Welfare Model. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H., & Lau, Maggie K. W. (Hrsg.) (2014). Managing Social Change and Social Policy in Greater China. Welfare regimes in transition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., & Jopling, D. A. (Hrsg.) (1997). The Conceptual Self in Context. Culture Experience Self Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noesselt, N. (2012). Governance-Formen in China. Theorie und Praxis des chinesischen Modells. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochiai, E. (2011). Unsustainable Societies: The Failure of Familialism in East Asia’s Compressed Modernity. In Historical Social Research 2, 219 – 245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onda, M. (2013). Mutual Help Networks and Social Transformation in Japan. In American Journal of Economics and Sociology 3, 531 – 564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, I. (2009). The Political and Social Economy of Care in the Republic of Korea. UNRISD Gender and Development Programme Paper Number 6. Genf: UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun, N., Ku, Ben Hok-bun, Yan, H., & Koo, A. (Hrsg.) (2016). Social Economy in China and the World. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, S., Kwon, H.-j., Yi, I., Kim, T., & Lee, J. (2011). The Korean State and Social Policy. How South Korea Lifted Itself from Poverty and Dictatorship to Affluence and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, P. G., Forsyth, A., & Kan, H. Y. (2016). China’s Urban Communities. Concepts, Contexts, and Well-Being. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, C.-s., & Shaw, I. (2003). Social Policy in South Korea: Cultural and Structural Factors in the Emergence of Welfare. In Social Policy & Administration 4, 328 – 341. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinkawa, T. (2013). Beyond Familialism? Welfare Regime Transformation in Japan. In H. Magara & S. Sacchi (Hrsg.), The Politics of Structural Reforms. Social and Industrial Policy Changes in Italy and Japan (S. 171 – 191).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromseth, J. R., Malesky, E. J., & Gueorguiev, D. D. (2017). China’s Governance Puzzle. Enabling Transparency and Participation in a Single-Party State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Shirley H.-L. (2012). Care Expectations, Mismatched: State and Family in Contemporary Singapore. In International Journal of Sociology and SocialPolicy 32, 650 – 663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda, H. (2005). Governance through the family: the political function of the domestic in Japan. In G. D. Hook (Hrsg.), Contested Governance in Japan. Sides and Issues (S. 233 – 248). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C.-C. (2004). Vom traditionellen China zum modernen Taiwan. Die Entwicklung funktionaler Differenzierung am Beispiel des politischen Systems und des Religionssystems. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C.-C. (2010). Public and Private in China and the West. A Preliminary Observation on the Interaction between Semantics and Societal Structures. Paper presented at International Workshop Comparative Studies of „Public“ and Private in Japan and China. School of Modern Languages and Cultures. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, 2010-08-08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K.-l. (2000). Social Welfare Development in East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, H. (2016). Different Translations, Contested Meanings: A Motor for the 1911 Revolution in China? In H. Schul-Forberg (Hrsg.), A Global Conceptual History of Asia, 1860 – 1940 (S. 43 – 60). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, S. (2006). Chinese Thought and Dialogical Universalism. In G. Delanty (Hrsg.), Europe and Asia Beyond East and West (S. 305 – 315). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., & Wong, C.-k. (Hrsg.) (2005). East Asian Welfare Regimes in Transition. From Confucianism to Globalization. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F.-L. (2005). Organizing through Division and Exclusion. China’s Hokou System. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (2012). All under heaven (tianxia). Cosmological perspectives and political ontologies in pre-modern Cina. In HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1, 337 – 383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The Nonprofit Economy. Lexington: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, W. R. (1987). Soziale Evolution in China: Entwicklung in eigener Regie. In Brennpunkte Sozialer Arbeit: Entwicklungspolitik, Entwicklungshilfe und Sozialarbeit (S. 95 – 108). Frankfurt am Main: Moritz Diesterweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, W. R. (1989). Eignung. Ethische Erwägungen. Frankfurt am Main: Moritz Diesterweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, W. R. (1994). Ritual und rechtes Leben. Studien zwischen den Kulturen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, W. R. (2007). Zum Stand der Theorieentwicklung in der Sozialwirtschaft. In W. R. Wendt & A. Wöhrle (Hrsg.), Sozialwirtschaft und Sozialmanagement in der Entwicklung ihrer Theorie (S. 19 – 100). Augsburg: Ziel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, W. R. (2010). Das ökosoziale Prinzip. Soziale Arbeit ökologisch verstanden. Freiburg i. Br.: Lambertus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B. (2013). Is Zhao’s Tianxia System Misunderstood? In Tsinghua China Law Review 1, 96 – 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, J. (2000). The Social Networks of Koreans. In Korea Journal 1, 325 – 352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2013). China’s Hokuo System. Markets, Migrants and Institutional Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T. (2005). Tianxia Tixi. Shijie Zhidu Thexue Daolun (Das System Alles unter dem Himmel. Eine Philosophie für die Welt als Institution, chinesisch). Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T. (2009). A Political World Philosophy in Terms of All-under-Heaven. In Diogenes 1, 5 – 18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stuttgart, Deutschland

    Wolf Rainer Wendt

Authors
  1. Wolf Rainer Wendt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf Rainer Wendt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät Soziale Arbeit, Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften - Hochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbüttel, Wolfenbüttel, Germany

    Ludger Kolhoff

  2. Duale Hochschule Baden- Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany

    Klaus Grunwald

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wendt, W.R. (2018). Sozialwirtschaftliche Regie im ostasiatischen Bezugsrahmen. In: Kolhoff, L., Grunwald, K. (eds) Aktuelle Diskurse in der Sozialwirtschaft I. Perspektiven Sozialwirtschaft und Sozialmanagement. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20319-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20319-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-20318-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-20319-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation