Skip to main content

What Makes Sensation of a Sentient Thing Possible: The Concept of Time in the Work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discussing New Materialism

Abstract

In this contribution, I will analyze the conceptualization of time in the work of Merleau-Ponty and how it shapes the idea of bodily intentionality. In his late work, a nonlinear concept of time prevails and fosters the idea of fleshly agency. I will draw upon “the immemorial” as “impossible past” (Merleau-Ponty 1968: 123) and ask to what extent the idea of originary pastness enables an approach to agency that broadens the current discussion of “new materialism.” In particular, I will argue that the immemorial institutes a temporality that is generative of meaning. As invisible or unconscious, it is written into the structure of flesh and makes self-differentiation possible. Hence, the emergence of self, other, and the world – or rather, as Merleau-Ponty puts it, the emergence of sentient, sensed, and the rest. Under that premise, humans and non-humans can be equated from a methodological point of view. However, there are also differences to the principle of generalized symmetry of Actor-Network Theory. I will show that only flesh comprises generative power, not matter. Finally, I will present the consequences that follow from Merleau-Ponty’s ontology of flesh and introduce video hermeneutics as developed in Kissmann (2014a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Young questioned the goal-orientation in Merleau-Ponty’s early work on intentionality. If action is identified with the object at which it is aimed, Merleau-Ponty neglects the situations where no goal is at play. For this reason, Young added the notion of “I cannot” to Merleau-Ponty’s “I can” (ibid.).

  2. 2.

    When the present moment becomes past, it is considered as retention. In contrast, when the present moment is projected into the future, Merleau-Ponty describes it as protention (ibid.: 439 f.).

  3. 3.

    Coenen criticized the Schutzean “typification” because, firstly, sense-making is characterized as mental process. And secondly, his critique drew upon typification as objectifying and generalizing activity. Using the work of Merleau-Ponty, he developed a new concept of bodily typification.

References

  • Al-Saji, A. 2007. The Temporality of Life. Merleau-Ponty, Bergson, and the Immemorial Past. The Southern Journal of Philosophy XLV: 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, Karen 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaras, R. 2004 [1991]: The Being of the Phenomenon. Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology. (Translated by Ted Toadvine and Leonard Lawlor). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1996 [1966]: Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. 2004. [1896]: Matter and Memory. Essay on the Relation of Body and Spirit, translated by N. Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, Ralf. 2009. Qualitative Bild- und Videointerpretation. Die dokumentarische Methode, Opladen & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaerts, G. 2003. Eingefleischte Sozialität. Zur Phänomenologie sozialer Praxis. Sociologia Internationalis 41 (1): 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation. Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, ed. John Law, p. 196–233 London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, Mauro. 2004. The Thinking of the Sensible. Merleau-Ponty’s A-Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, Herman. 1985. Diesseits von subjektivem Sinn und kollektivem Zwang. Schütz – Durkheim – Merleau-Ponty. Phänomenologische Soziologie im Feld des zwischenleiblichen Verhaltens. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1997 [1980]: Tausend Plateaus. Kapitalismus und Schizophrenie. Berlin: Merve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M. 2016. The Immemorial Time of Gender. Merleau-Ponty’s Polymorphic Matrix of Original Past. Chiasmi International. Trilingual Studies Concerning the Thought of Merleau-Ponty 18: 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Christian, J. Hindmarsh, and P. Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London et al.: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1991 [1893–1917]: On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, translated by J. B. Brough. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissmann, Ulrike Tikvah. 2009a. How Medical Forms are Used. The Study of Doctor-Patient Consultations from a Sociological Hermeneutic Approach. In Video Interaction Analysis: Methods and Methodology, ed. Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann, p. 87–105. Frankfurt/M. et al.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissmann, U. T. 2009b. Fürsorgliche Orientierung jenseits des Arzt-Patienten Verhältnisses: Informationsarbeit im Operationssaal. Feministische Studien 27 (2): 302–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissmann, Ulrike Tikvah 2014a. Die Sozialität des Visuellen. Fundierung der hermeneutischen Videoanalyse und materiale Untersuchungen. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissmann, U. T. 2014b. How Hegemonic Masculinity can be Undermined. Gender Hierarchies and Power Relations in the Operating Room. Science, Technology and Innovations Studies 10 (2): 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissmann, Ulrike Tikvah. 2016a. Gibt es objektive Gesten und Mimik? Zum leiblichen Gedächtnis als Typisierungen leiblichen Sinns. In Der Körper als soziales Gedächtnis. Book series “Soziales Gedächtnis, Erinnern und Vergessen – Memory Studies”, eds. Michael Heinlein, O. Dimbath, L. Schindler, and P. Wehling, p. 135–152. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissmann, U. T. 2016b. Ein Plädoyer für Missverständnisse. Methodologische Einsichten aus Ethnomethodologie und Leibphänomenologie. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41 (1): 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2008. What is the Style of Matters of Concern? Spinoza Lectures. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazis, Glen A. 1992. Merleau-Ponty and the “Backward Flow” of Time. The Reversibility of Temporality and the Temporality of Reversibility. In Merleau-Ponty, Hermeneutics, and Postmodernism, eds. Thomas Busch, and Shaun Gallagher, p. 53–68. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1968 [1964]: The Visible and the Invisible. (Edited by Claude Lefort and translated by Alphonso Lingis). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 2010 [1954–1955]: Institution and Passivity. Course Notes from the Collège de France. (Translated by Leonard Lawlor and Heath Massey). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012 [1945]: Phenomenology of Perception. (Translated by Donald A. Landes). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. 2003. Working with Video. How Surgeons Produce Video Records of their Actions. Visual Studies 18 (1): 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, Lorenza. 2007. Operating Together through Videoconference. Members’ Procedures for Accomplishing a Common Space of Action. In Orders of Ordinary Action. Respecifying Sociological Knowledge, eds. Stephen Hester, and David Francis, p. 51–67. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1982. The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, René, B. Schnettler, and H. Knoblauch. 2013. Videographie. Einführung in die interpretative Videoanalyse sozialer Situationen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 2005 [1980]. Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality. In On Female Body Experience. “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays, ed. Iris Marion Young, p. 27–45. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeit Online. 2013. Ein umgekehrter Hitlergruß? Zeit Online. https://www.zeit.de/sport/2013-12/anelka-quenelle-frankreich-debatte. (Downloaded on April 29, 2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kissmann, U.T. (2019). What Makes Sensation of a Sentient Thing Possible: The Concept of Time in the Work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty. In: Kissmann, U., van Loon, J. (eds) Discussing New Materialism. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22299-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22300-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics