Skip to main content

Die Schaffung kreativer Rahmenbedingungen – Was die Schule tun kann

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kreativität in der Schule - finden, fördern, leben

Zusammenfassung

Die größte Herausforderung an die Schule und damit die Lehrenden ist alle SchülerInnen gleichermaßen in ihrer Kreativität zu fördern, da die systemischen Bedingungen eine individuelle Förderung nur schwer zulassen. Eine interessante Alternative kann sein eine Lernumgebung zu schaffen, die den kreativen Prozess im Ganzen begünstigt. Basierend auf pädagogisch-psychologischen und wirtschaftlichen Erkenntnissen erarbeitet das Kapitel die hierfür notwendigen kreativen Rahmenbedingungen und diskutiert mögliche Lösungsvorschläge.

The question is, ,where is creativity‘ and not ‚what is creativity‘?

(Csikszentmihalyi 1988, S. 325)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Im Original:„When it comes to nurturing creativity in the classroom, the learning environment is one of the most important factors—determining, in large part, whether creative potential will be supported (or suppressed)“

  2. 2.

    Im Original:„There is no school better than their teachers. Teachers are the lifeblood of the success of the schools.“

Literatur

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in the context. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 333–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood–creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeftink, F., van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2008). The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: Do you need a break right now? Creativity Research Journal, 20, 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Hrsg.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2010). Kreativität. Wenn Sie das Unmögliche schaffen und ihre Grenzen überwinden. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gkolia, C., Brundett, M., & Switzer, J. (2009). An education action zone at work: Primary teacher perceptions of the efficacy of a creative learning and collaborative leadership project. Education, 37, 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2014). Lernen sichtbar machen. Hohengehren: Schneider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., Hartzell, S. A., & Greene, M. T. (2009). Fostering creativity in the classroom: Effects of teachers’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, and goal orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, G., & Jarman, B. (1992). Breakpoint and beyond: Mastering the future today. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Inc. (2015). Deadline. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deadline?show=0&t=1422443340. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.

  • Montessori, M. (2005). Kinder sind anders. München: dtv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics. How good ideas spread. The lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramge, T. (2010). Die kreativere Gesellschaft. Stiftung neue Verantwortung. https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/10_08_policy_brief_die_kreativere_gesellschaft_final.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.

  • Rappke, H.-D. (2004). Montessori heute – Eine moderne Pädagogik für Familie, Kindergarten und Schule. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2006). [TED Talks Education]. Do schools kill creativity? http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.

  • Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds – Learning to be creative. Chichester: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2013). [TED Talks Education]. How to escape education’s death valley. https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_how_to_escape_education_s_death_valley?language=de. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.

  • Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students’ achievement? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 47–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIME Magazine. (2018). Photos: Life inside the Googleplex. http://content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1947844_2013326,00.html. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Franklin Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Sophie Haager .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haager, J.S. (2019). Die Schaffung kreativer Rahmenbedingungen – Was die Schule tun kann. In: Haager, J., Baudson, T. (eds) Kreativität in der Schule - finden, fördern, leben. Psychologie in Bildung und Erziehung: Vom Wissen zum Handeln. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22970-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22970-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22969-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22970-2

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics