Zusammenfassung
Die größte Herausforderung an die Schule und damit die Lehrenden ist alle SchülerInnen gleichermaßen in ihrer Kreativität zu fördern, da die systemischen Bedingungen eine individuelle Förderung nur schwer zulassen. Eine interessante Alternative kann sein eine Lernumgebung zu schaffen, die den kreativen Prozess im Ganzen begünstigt. Basierend auf pädagogisch-psychologischen und wirtschaftlichen Erkenntnissen erarbeitet das Kapitel die hierfür notwendigen kreativen Rahmenbedingungen und diskutiert mögliche Lösungsvorschläge.
The question is, ,where is creativity‘ and not ‚what is creativity‘?
(Csikszentmihalyi 1988, S. 325)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Im Original:„When it comes to nurturing creativity in the classroom, the learning environment is one of the most important factors—determining, in large part, whether creative potential will be supported (or suppressed)“
- 2.
Im Original:„There is no school better than their teachers. Teachers are the lifeblood of the success of the schools.“
Literatur
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in the context. Boulder: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 77–87.
Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 333–336.
Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 92–98.
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood–creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.
Beeftink, F., van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2008). The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: Do you need a break right now? Creativity Research Journal, 20, 358–364.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.
Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 381–389.
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 201–212.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Hrsg.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2010). Kreativität. Wenn Sie das Unmögliche schaffen und ihre Grenzen überwinden. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687–697.
Gkolia, C., Brundett, M., & Switzer, J. (2009). An education action zone at work: Primary teacher perceptions of the efficacy of a creative learning and collaborative leadership project. Education, 37, 131–144.
Hattie, J. (2014). Lernen sichtbar machen. Hohengehren: Schneider.
Hong, E., Hartzell, S. A., & Greene, M. T. (2009). Fostering creativity in the classroom: Effects of teachers’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, and goal orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 192–208.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.
Jeffrey, B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 399–414.
Land, G., & Jarman, B. (1992). Breakpoint and beyond: Mastering the future today. New York: HarperBusiness.
Merriam-Webster Inc. (2015). Deadline. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deadline?show=0&t=1422443340. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.
Montessori, M. (2005). Kinder sind anders. München: dtv.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.
Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics. How good ideas spread. The lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.
Ramge, T. (2010). Die kreativere Gesellschaft. Stiftung neue Verantwortung. https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/10_08_policy_brief_die_kreativere_gesellschaft_final.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.
Rappke, H.-D. (2004). Montessori heute – Eine moderne Pädagogik für Familie, Kindergarten und Schule. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Robinson, K. (2006). [TED Talks Education]. Do schools kill creativity? http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.
Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds – Learning to be creative. Chichester: Capstone.
Robinson, K. (2013). [TED Talks Education]. How to escape education’s death valley. https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_how_to_escape_education_s_death_valley?language=de. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students’ achievement? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 47–72.
Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94–120.
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
TIME Magazine. (2018). Photos: Life inside the Googleplex. http://content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1947844_2013326,00.html. Zugegriffen: 7. Jan. 2019.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Franklin Watts.
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haager, J.S. (2019). Die Schaffung kreativer Rahmenbedingungen – Was die Schule tun kann. In: Haager, J., Baudson, T. (eds) Kreativität in der Schule - finden, fördern, leben. Psychologie in Bildung und Erziehung: Vom Wissen zum Handeln. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22970-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22970-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22969-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22970-2
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)