Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretisch-konzeptionelle Ansätze der Teamführung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personalmanagement

  • 81k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Lernziele dieses Kapitels: Die Leser überblicken die zentralen Ansätze der Teamforschung. Die Leser entwickeln ein Verständnis für Trittbrettfahrereffekte aus ökonomischer Perspektive. Die Leser kennen ausgewählte verhaltenswissenschaftliche Theorien und Konzepte zur Führung von Teams. Die Leser überblicken aktuelle wissenschaftliche Weiterentwicklungen der behandelten theoretischen Ansätze. Die Leser können die praktische Bedeutung der theoretisch-konzeptionellen Ansätze der Teamführung einordnen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backes-Gellner, U., Lazear, E., & Wolff, B. (2001). Personalökonomik: Fortgeschrittene Anwendungen für das Management. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, R. (1981). Management teams: Why they succeed or fail. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berné, E. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy. New York: Castle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berné, E. (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1968). Interaction: Social exchange. In D. Sills & R. Merton (Hrsg.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Bd. 7, S. 452–458). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucek, W., & Randell, G. (1996). An assessment of the construct validity of the Belbin self-perception inventory and observer’s assessment from the perspective of the five-factor model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(4), 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, D. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48(6), 647–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1997). Spieltheorie für Einsteiger: Strategisches Know-how für Gewinner. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulewicz, V. (1995). A validation of Belbin’s team roles from 16PF and OPQ using bosses ratings of competence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S., Hunter, T., & Macrosson, W. (2000). The distribution of Belbin team roles among UK managers. Personnel Review, 29(1/2), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Steele, H., & Pendleton, D. (1993). A psychometric assessment of the Belbin team-role self-perception inventory. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 66(3), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Towards a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(March), 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 324–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, L., & Reitz, H. (1981). Group effectiveness in organizations. Glenview: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karau, S., & Williams, K. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koslowsky, M. (2009). A multi-level model of withdrawal: Integrating and synthesizing theory and findings. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kräkel, M. (2012). Organisation und Management (5. Aufl.). Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J., & Radner, R. (1972). Economic theory of teams. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrimmon, M. (1995). Teams without roles: Empowering teams for greater creativity. Journal of Management Development, 14(6), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. (1976). The optimal structure of incentives and authority within an organization. Bell Journal of Economics, 7(1), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oelsnitz, D. von der, & Busch, M. (2006). Social Loafing – Leistungsminderung in Teams. Personalführung, 39(9), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, M., Christian, M., & Ellis, A. (2010). Motivating interdependent teams: Individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, J., & Stanton, N. (1999). Testing Belbin’s team role theory of effective groups. Journal of Management Development, 18(8), 652–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quader, M., & Quader, M. (2008). A critical analysis of high performing teams: A case study based on the British Telecommunication (BT) PLC. Journal of Services Research, 8(2), 175–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieck, C. (1993). Spieltheorie – Einführung für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R. (2002). Coaching von Teams: Ein systematischer Ansatz zur Messung und Steigerung der Einflussgrößen des Teamerfolgs. Zeitschrift für Führung und Organisation, 71(2), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R. (2003). Teams an der Schnittstelle zwischen Anbieter- und Kunden-Unternehmen: Eine integrative Betrachtung. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R. (2004). Drivers of team performance: What do we know and what have we still to learn? Schmalenbach Business Review, 56(3), 274–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R. (2005). Erfolgsfaktoren von Teams: Eine Analyse direkter und indirekter Effekte. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 75(10), 971–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D., & Moghaddam, F. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives (2. Aufl.). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. (1965). Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., & Karau, S. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 570–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachgebiet für Marketing und Personalmanagement, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    Ruth Stock-Homburg

  2. FB Wirtschaft, Rheinische Fachhochschule Köln, Köln, Deutschland

    Matthias Groß

Authors
  1. Ruth Stock-Homburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Groß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stock-Homburg, R., Groß, M. (2019). Theoretisch-konzeptionelle Ansätze der Teamführung. In: Personalmanagement. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26081-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26081-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26080-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26081-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation