Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zum Verständnis organisationaler Zuverlässigkeit von Einsatzorganisationen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Einsatzorganisationen

  • 5890 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Im vorliegenden Beitrag erläutert die Autorin zunächst die in der gegenwärtigen Hochzuverlässigkeitsforschung thematisierten theoretischen Konstrukte Improvisation, Mindfulness, Organisationale Routinen, Resilienz sowie Sensemaking. Darüber hinaus wird ein Bezugsrahmen konzipiert, der die Zusammenhänge zwischen den beschriebenen Konstrukten zum Verständnis organisationaler Zuverlässigkeit von Einsatzorganisationen aus einer holistischen Perspektive adressiert. Die Autorin resümiert, dass die beschriebenen Konstrukte als Komponenten einsatzspezifischen Organisierens im Spannungsfeld zwischen Standardisierung und Flexibilität zu begreifen sind. In diesem Zusammenhang wird überdies die besondere Rolle von Kommunikation als übergeordnetes, strukturierendes Element von Erfahrungen bzw. Wahrnehmungen in Hochrisikosituationen hervorgehoben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Baker, Ted; Nelson, Reed E. (2005): Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 50, S. 329–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, Benjamin E.; Scott, Cliff W. (2010): Organizing Ambiguity: A Grounded Theory of Leadership and Sensemaking Within Dangerous Contexts. In: Military Psychology 22 (1), S. 42–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Frank J. (1998): Coda-Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning. In: Organization Science 9 (5), S. 605–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechky, Beth A.; Okhuysen, Gerardo A. (2011): Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. In: Academy of Management Journal 54 (29), S. 239–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, Paul F. (1994): Thinking in Jazz. The Infinite Art of Improvisation. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthod, Olivier; Grothe-Hammer, Michael; Müller-Seiz, Gordon; Sydow, Jörg (2017): From High- Reliability Organizations to High-Reliability Networks: The Dynamics of Network Governance in the Face of Emergency. In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (2), S. 352–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthod, Olivier; Grothe-Hammer, Michael; Sydow, Jörg (2015): Characteristics of High-Reliability Networks. In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 23 (1), S. 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, Ruth; Christianson, Marlys K.; Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.; Rosenthal, Marilynn M. (2006): A sensemaking lens on reliability. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (7), S. 897–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Brian S.; Gray, Peter H. (2006): Reliability, Mindfulness, and Information Systems. In: MIS Quarterly 30 (2), S. 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, Marlys K.; Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.; Miller, Melissa A.; Iwashyna, Theodore J. (2011): Becoming a high reliability organization. In: Critical Care 15 (6), S. 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Michael D. (2007): Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine. In: Organization Studies 28 (5), S. 773–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard Michael; March, James G. (1963): A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danner-Schröder, Anja (2016): Routine dynamics and routine interruptions: How to create and recreate recognizability of routine patterns. In: Managementforschung 26 (1), S. 63–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danner-Schröder, Anja; Geiger, Daniel (2016): Unravelling the Motor of Patterning Work: Toward an Understanding of the Microlevel Dynamics of Standardization and Flexibility. In: Organization Science 27 (3), S. 633–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionysiou, Dionysios D.; Tsoukas, Haridimos (2013): Understanding the (Re)Creation of Routines from Within: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. In: AMR 38 (2), S. 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, Eric M. (1990): Jamming. Transcendence Through Organizing. In: Communication Research 17 (2), S. 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, Martin (2020): Die Einsatzorganisation als Lernende Organisation. In: Eva-Maria Kern, Gregor Richter, Johannes C. Müller und Fritz-Helge Voß (Hrsg.): Einsatzorganisationen. Erfolgreiches Handeln in Hochrisikosituationen. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, S. 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha S. (2000): Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. In: Organization Science 11 (6), S. 611–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha S.; Orlikowski, Wanda J. (2011): Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory. In: Organization Science 22 (5), S. 1240–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha S.; Pentland, Brian T. (2003): Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 48, S. 94–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Jessica L. (2018): Revisiting high-reliability organizing: obstacles to safety and resilience. In: Corporate Communications: An International Journal 23 (2), S. 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigotto, M. Laura; Zamarian, Marco (2015): Mindful by routine: Evidence from the Italian Air Force Tornado crews flying practices. In: Journal of Management & Organization 21 (3), S. 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, John W.; Boyer, Kenneth K.; Ward, Peter T. (2017): Achieving Time-Sensitive Organizational Performance Through Mindful Use of Technologies and Routines. In: Organization Science 28 (6), S. 1061–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, Douglas N.; Chakravorty, Satya S. (2016): Creating high reliability organizations using mindfulness. In: Journal of Business Research 69 (8), S. 2873–2881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T.; Freeman, John (1984): Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. In: American Sociological Review 49 (2), S. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, Crawford S. (1973): Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. In: Annual review of ecology and systematics 4 (1), S. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Jody L.S.; Johansson, Catrin (2018): The communicative constitution of adaptive capacity during Sweden’s Västmanland wildfire. In: Corporate Communications: An International Journal 23 (2), S. 162–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamoche, Ken; Cunha, Miguel Pina e. (2001): Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation. In: Organization Studies 22 (5), S. 733–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayes, Christoph; Allen, Nate; Self, Nate (2017): How Leaders Learn from Experience in Extreme Situations: The Case of the U.S. Military in Takur Ghar, Afghanistan. In: Michael Holenweger, Michael Karl Jager und Franz Kernic (Hrsg.): Leadership in Extreme Situations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, S. 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, Eva-Maria; Hartung, Thomas (2013): Zielorientiertes Risikomanagement bei Einsatzorganisationen. In: Wolfgang Kersten und Jochen Wittmann (Hrsg.): Kompetenz, Interdisziplinarität und Komplexität in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, S. 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, J. L. (2005): Shared Mindfulness in Cockpit Crisis Situations: An Exploratory Analysis. In: Journal of Business Communication 42 (2), S. 135–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, Sally (2005): The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking. In: The Academy of Management Journal 48 (1), S. 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistele, Peter; Pawlowsky, Peter; Kaufmann, Stefan (2015): Kollektive Achtsamkeit als Erfolgsfaktor von High Reliability Organizations. In: Peter Gausmann, Michael Henninger und Joachim Koppenberg (Hrsg.): Patientensicherheitsmanagement. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, S. 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine; Miner, Anne S. (1998): Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory. In: The Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 698–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhren, Wilem J.; van den Eede, Gerd; van de Walle, Bartel (2007): Organizational Learning for the Incident Management Process: Lessons from High Reliability Organizations. In: ECIS 2007 Proceedings 65, S. 576–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Johannes C. (2018): Wissenstransfer in Einsatzorganisationen. Empirische Entwicklung eines Bezugsrahmens für den intraorganisationalen Transfer von Einsatzwissen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R.; Winter, Sidney G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Fran H.; Stevens, Susan P.; Pfefferbaum, Betty; Wyche, Karen F.; Pfefferbaum, Rose L. (2008): Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. In: American journal of community psychology 41 (1-2), S. 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, Douglas (2006): Disaster Resilience: Integrating Individual, Community, Institutional, and Environmental Perspectives. In: Douglas Paton und David Moore Johnston (Hrsg.): Disaster resilience. An integrated approach. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas, S. 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, Brian T.; Hærem, Thorvald; Hillison, Derek (2011): The (N)Ever-Changing World: Stability and Change in Organizational Routines. In: Organization Science 22 (6), S. 1369–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, Annie (2005): Leadership and Organizing: Sensemaking in Action. In: Leadership 1 (1), S. 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rerup, Claus; Levinthal, Daniel A. (2014): Situating the Concept of Organizational Mindfulness: The Multiple Dimensions of Organizational Learning. In: Guido Becke (Hrsg.): Mindful Change in Times of Permanent Reorganization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, S. 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Rebecca M. (2018): When hierarchy becomes collaborative. In: Corporate Communications: An International Journal 23 (4), S. 599–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Karlene H.; Stout, Suzanne K.; Halpern, Jennifer J. (1994): Decision Dynamics in Two High Reliability Military Organizations. In: Management Science 40 (5), S. 614–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röser, Tobias (2017): Management von Einsatzprozessen: Eine explorative Untersuchung am Beispiel von Feuerwehr und Rettungsdienst. Lohmar: Eul Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röser, Tobias; Kern, Eva-Maria (2019): Management von Einsatzprozessen: Flexibilität durch Standardisierung. In: Zeitschrift für Führung und Organisation 88 (1), S. 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schakel, Jan-Kees; van Fenema, Paul C.; Faraj, Samer (2016): Shots Fired! Switching Between Practices in Police Work. In: Organization Science 27 (2), S. 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, Yvonne M. (2020): Organisationale Resilienz und Antifragilität in Einsatzorganisationen. In: Eva-Maria Kern, Gregor Richter, Johannes C. Müller und Fritz-Helge Voß (Hrsg.): Einsatzorganisationen. Erfolgreiches Handeln in Hochrisikosituationen. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, S. 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Anja; Geiger, Daniel (2014): Routine versus Improvisation im Katastrophenfall - Zur Bedeutung von Routinen in turbulenten Situationen. In: Oskar Grün und Andrea Schenker-Wicki (Hrsg.): Katastrophenmanagement. Grundlagen, Fallbeispiele und Gestaltungsoptionen aus betriebswirtschaftlicher Sicht. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, S. 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.; Vogus, Timothy J.; Dane, Erik (2016): Mindfulness in Organizations: A Cross-Level Review. In: Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3 (1), S. 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, James R.; van Every, Elizabeth J. (2000): The emergent organization. Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, Matthijs, J.; Rutkowski, Anne-Françoise (2017): Catch Me If You Can. Technological Constaints/Affordances and Mindfulness during Collaborative Police Emergency Response. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2017 (HICSS-50). Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, January 4-7, 2017. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; HICSS, S. 771–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogus, Timothy J.; Rothman, Naomi B.; Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.; Weick, Karl E. (2014): The affective foundations of high-reliability organizing. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior 35 (4), S. 592–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogus, Timothy J.; Welbourne, Theresa M. (2003): Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (7), S. 877–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtendorf, Tricia (2004): Improvising 9/11: Organizational Improvisation Following the World Trade Center Disaster. University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. (1998): Introductory Essay – Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis. In: Organization Science 9 (5), S. 543–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E.; Roberts, Karlene H. (1993): Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (3), S. 357–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E.; Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. (2010): Das Unerwartete managen. Wie Unternehmen aus Extremsituationen lernen. 2., vollständig überarbeitete Auflage. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E.; Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.; Obstfeld, D. (2008): Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfluness. In: Arjen Boin (Hrsg.): Crisis management. Los Angeles: SAGE, S. 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E.; Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.; Obstfeld, David (2005): Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. In: Organization Science 16 (4), S. 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron B. (1988): Searching for Safety. Social Theory and Social Policy. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Jana M. Holling

Authors
  1. Jana M. Holling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana M. Holling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Neubiberg, Germany

    Eva-Maria Kern

  2. Sozialwissenschaften der Bundeswehr, Zentrum für Militärgeschichte und, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany

    Gregor Richter

  3. München, Germany

    Johannes C. Müller

  4. München, Germany

    Fritz-Helge Voß

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holling, J.M. (2020). Zum Verständnis organisationaler Zuverlässigkeit von Einsatzorganisationen. In: Kern, EM., Richter, G., Müller, J., Voß, FH. (eds) Einsatzorganisationen . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28921-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28921-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-28920-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-28921-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation