Abstract
Three methods of microscopical investigation with X-rays are in process of active development: the total reflection, the contact microradiographic and the direct projection methods. The total reflection method, in which true focussing of X-rays takes place at polished cylindrical mirrors, has been investigated very thoroughly by Kirkpatrick and Baez (1) and a detailed account of its present state has been given by Kirkpatrick and Pattee (2). It has attained a resolving power of about 0.25 μ, but further progress is hindered by technical difficulties of preparing the specially curved surfaces required to reduce the severe aberrations that occur in conditions of glancing incidence. The contact method is the simplest, since the specimen is photographed at one-to-one magnification on a very fine grained emulsion, without the need for any optical element in either the electron or the X-ray path. It has been developed to a high degree of usefulness in biological research by Engström (3, 4) in particular, who has also investigated its value as a method of microanalysis by differential absorption of X-rays [see also Lindström (5), Clemmons (6)]. As the micro-negative must be enlarged through an optical system, in order to make available the stored information, the resolving power is limited to that of the best optical microscope and this limit (about 0.2 μ) has now been reached. Efforts have been made (7, 8) to circumvent this difficulty by using electron microscopy to enlarge the photographic image, but the difficulties are formidable. The projection method of X-ray microscopy, on the other hand, has no such limitation because it provides a direct initial magnification of the image, which is recorded on a normal type of emulsion and requires little or no subsequent enlargement. A resolving power of about 0.1 μ has already been obtained (9) and further improvement is possible. The projection method is closely related to electron microscopy, since electron lenses are employed to obtain the very small focal spot by which the image is projected. The resolution and exposure time depend on the size and intensity of the spot, and therefore on the aberrations of the electron lenses. For this reason it is appropriate to discuss the physical aspects of projection X-ray microscopy in the present meeting. Attention will be directed mainly to advances made since the 1956 Symposium on X-ray microscopy (10).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kirkpatrick, P., and A. V. Baez: J. opt. Soc. Amer. 38, 766 (1948).
Kirkpatrick, P., and H. H. Pattee jr.: Handbuch der Physik 30, 305 (1957).
Engström, A.: Acta radiol. (Stockh.) Suppl. 63, 1 (1946).
EngströmA.: Phys. Techn. Biol. Res. 3, 489. New York: Acad. Press 1956.
Lindström, B.: Acta radiol. (Stockh.) Suppl. 125, 1, (1955).
Clemmons, J. G.: Exp. Cell. Res. Suppl. 4, 172 (1957).
Recourt, A.: Proc. Symp. X-ray Microscopy and Microradiography, Cambridge 1956. Cambridge: University Press 1957, 234.
Ladd, W. A., and M. W. Ladd: Proc. Symp. X-ray Microscopy and Microradiography, Cambridge 1956. Cambridge: University Press 1957, 383.
Nixon, W. C.: Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. A 232, 475 (1955).
Proceedings of the Symposium on X-ray Microscopy and Microradiography, Cambridge 1956. Cambridge: University Press 1957.
Bessen, I. I.: Norelco Rep. 4, 119 (1957).
Cosslett, V. E., and P. Duncumb: Nature (Lond.) 177, 1172 (1956);
Cosslett, V. E., and P. Duncumb: Stockholm Conf. Elect. Microscopy, 1956. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell 1957, 12.
Duncumb, P.: Thesis, Cambridge (1957).
Duncumb, P.: This volume, p. 267
Cosslett, V. E., and W. C. Nixon: Nature (Lund.) 168, 24 (1951).
Cosslett, V. E., and W. C. Nixon: J. appl. Physics 24, 616 (1953).
Cosslett, V. E., and W. C. Nixon: Proc. Phys. Soc. B 65, 782 (1952).
Langner, G.: Proc. Symp. X-ray Microscopy and Microradiography, Cambridge 1956. Cambridge: University Press 1957, 293.
Ong Sing Poen, and J. B. Le Poole: Appl. Sci. Res. B7, 233 (1958).
Nixon, W. C.: This volume, p. 249
Teves, M. C., and T. Tor,: Philips Tech. Rev. 14, 33 (1952).
Kazan, B., and F. H. Nicoll: J. opt. Soc. Amer. 47, 887 (1957).
Haine, M. E., A. E. Ennos, and P. A. Einstein: J. Sci. Inst. 35, 466 (1958).
Nixon, W. C., and H. H. Patteejr.: Proc. Symp. X-ray Microscopy and Microradiography, Cambridge 1956. Cambridge: University Press 1957, 397.
Pattee, H. H. jr.: Science 128, 977 (1958).
Feldman, C., and M. O’hara: J. opt. Soc. Amer. 47, 300 (1957).
Long, J. V. P., and V. E. Cosslett: Proc. Symp. X-ray Microscopy and Microradiography, Cambridge 1956. Cambridge: University Press 1957, 435.
Long, J. V. P., and V. E. Cosslett: J. Sci. Inst. 35, 323 (1958).
Röckert, H.: Acta odont. stand. Suppl. 25, (1958).
Long, J. V. P., and J. D. C. Mcconnell: Mineralogical Magazine 32, 117 (1959).
Castaing, R.: Thesis, Paris (1951).
Borovsxii, I. B.: Problemy Metallurgi (A. N. SSSR: Moscow), 1953, 135; Zavodskaya Lab. 10, 1234 (1957).
Mulvey, T.: This volume, p. 263
Duxcumb, P., and D. A. Melford: Metallurgia 57, 159 (1958).
Borries, B. Von: Z. wiss. Mikrosk. 60, 329 (1952).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1960 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cosslett, V.E. (1960). The projection X-ray microscope and related microanalytical techniques. In: Bargmann, W., Möllenstedt, G., Niehrs, H., Peters, D., Ruska, E., Wolpers, C. (eds) Verhandlungen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01991-7_77
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01991-7_77
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-01696-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-01991-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive