Abstract
A new satellite mission to map the Earth’s gravitational field (GRACE) is based on inter-satellite tracking using micro-wave ranging which can be used to solve for parameters of a global spherical harmonic model of the gravitational field using traditional satellite orbital perturbation analysis. An alternative algorithm has been developed to use the inter-satellite range-rate, supplemented by GPS baseline vector velocities and accelerometer data, to estimate in situ geopotential differences. The collection of these data, treated as a set of boundary values in potential theory, should yield higher geopotential resolution in the polar latitudes than provided by a truncated spherical harmonic model because of the high concentration of data in these areas. On the other hand, in situ data must be downward continued for local geoid determination, whereas this is already incorporated in the spherical harmonic models. Simulations confirm that although spherical harmonic estimations also yield relatively higher accuracy near the poles, local geoid estimation from in situ geopotential difference measurements is even more accurate at the poles, by a factor of two or higher for the case of nineteen days’ worth of GRACE data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bjerhammar, A. (1987): Discrete physical geodesy. Report no.380, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Bouman, J. (1998): Quality of regularization methods. Report no.98.2, DEOS, Delft University Press, The Netherlands.
Cui, C. and D. Lelgemann (2000): On non-linear low-low SST observation equations for the determination of the geopotential based on an analytical solution. Journal of Geodesy, 74(5), 431–440.
Dickey, J.O., et al. (1997): Satellite gravity and the geosphere. Report from the Committee on Earth Gravity from Space, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
Heiskanen, W.A. and H. Moritz, 1967: Physical Geodesy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
Garcia, R. (2001): Local geoid determination from GRACE mission. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Ilk, K.H., J. Kusche, and S. Rudolph (2000): A contribution to data combination in ill-posed downward continuation problems. Submitted to Journal of Geodynamics Research.
Jekeli, C. (1996): Spherical harmonic analysis, aliasing, and filtering. Journal of Geodesy, 70(4), 214–223.
Jekeli, C. (1999): The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 75(2), 85–100.
Keating, T., P. Taylor, W. Kahn, F. Lerch (1986): Geopotential Research Mission, Science, Engineering, and Program Summary. NASA Tech. Memo. 86240.
Lemoine, F.G. et al. (1998): The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA Technical Report NASA/TP-1998–206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.
Rapp, R.H. (1997): Use of potential coefficient models for geoid undulation determinations using a spherical harmonic representation of the height anomaly/geoid undulation difference. J. Geodesy, 71(5), 282–289.
Stanton, R., S. Bettadpur, C. Dunn, K.P. Renner, and M. Watkins (1998): GRACE Science and Mission Requirements Document. Report no. 327–200, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
Tapley, B.D. and C. Reigber (1998): GRACE: A satellite-to-satellite tracking geopotential mapping mission. Proceedings of Second Joint Meeting of the Int. Gravity Commission and the Int. Geoid Commission, 7–12 September 1998, Trieste.
Wahr, J., M. Molenaar, F. Bryan (1998): Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. J. Geophys. Res., 103(B12), 30205–30229.
Yuan, D.N., C.K. Shum, and B.D. Tapley (1988): Gravity field determination and error assessment techniques. Proceedings of the Chapman Conference for Progress in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field, pp. 15–18, 13–16 September 1988, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jekeli, C., Garcia, R. (2001). Local geoid determination with in situ geopotential data obtained from satellite-to-satellite tracking. In: Sideris, M.G. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Geodynamics 2000. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 123. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04827-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04827-6_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07634-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04827-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive