Skip to main content

Bayesian Networks in Decision Support

  • Chapter
Power Plant Surveillance and Diagnostics

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

Since the beginning of industrialism, the complexity of industrial processes has been continuously increasing. In modem plants during normal operation this complexity is handled by the computerised control system. However, some process conditions outside the design of the control system still have to be managed by the human operator. These conditions can be due to equipment malfunction, unknown inputs and disturbances. Due to the complexity and the limited direct process interaction that operators experience, they often have difficulties making the right decisions in these abnormal situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berec L (1998) A multi-model method to fault detection and diagnosis: Bayesian solution. An introductory treatise. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 12: 81–92

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford RL, Bickmore, TW, Caluori VA (1997) Real-time sensor validation for autonomous flight control. AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 33rd, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson TO, Wennersten R (2001a) Graphical process models for risk assessment and operator decision support. In: 10th International symposium on Loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 699–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson TO, Wennersten R (2001b) Sensor and actuator fault diagnosis with a Bayesian network based on dynamic linear models. Submitted to: Computers and Chemical Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Catino CA, Grantham SD, Ungar LH (1991) Automatic generation of qualitative models of chemical process unit. Computers and Chemical Engineering 15: 583–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Patton RJ (1999) Robust model-based fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. Kluwer Academic, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SS, Kang KS, Kim HG, Chang SH (1995) Development of an on-line fuzzy expert system for integrated alarm processing in nuclear power plants. IEEE Transactions on nuclear science 42: 1406–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong HG and Walley WJ (1996) Rule-based versus probabilistic approaches to the diagnosis of faults in wastewater treatment processes. Artificial intelligence in engineering 1: 265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs JJ, Vogel EF (1993) A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering 17: 245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide P, Maybeck P (1996) An MMAE failure detection system for the F-16. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and electronic systems 32: 1125–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantoni PF (2000) Neuro-fuzzy model applied to full range signal validation of PWR nuclear power plant data. International Journal of General Systems 29: 305–320

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P.M. (1996) Analytical and qualitative model-based fault diagnosis — A survey and some new results. European J. of Control 2: 6–28

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman N, Murphy K, Russell S (1998) Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp 139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RD, Harle DA (1998) Pattern discovery and specification techniques for alarm correlation. In: IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium. Vol. 3, pp 713–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler JJ. (1998) Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Crossman JA, Murphey YL, Coleman M (2000) Automotive signal diagnostics using wavelets and machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 49: 1650–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horovitz E, Barry M (1995) Display of information for time-critical decision making. Proceedings of Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp 296–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Iri M, Aoki K, O’Shima E, Matsuyama H (1979) An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical processes. Computers and Chemical Engineering 3: 489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch H, Kroschel K (1994) Applying Bayesian networks to fault diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE Conference on Control Applications 2, pp 895–900

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer M.A. (1987) Expert systems for process fault diagnosis: a general framework. In: Foundations of Computer Aided Process Operations. Proceedings of the First International Conference, pp 557–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung D, Romagnoli J (2000) Dynamic probabilistic model-based expert system for fault diagnosis. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24: 2473–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user. Prentice Hall, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor JF, Kourti T, Nomikos P (1996) Analysis, monitoring and fault diagnosis of industrial processes using multivariate statistical projection methods. In: IFAC 13a` Triennal World Congress M, pp 145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy TJ, Ye N (1994) Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering 18: 383–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo JK, Lee G, Nam DS, Yoon YH, Yoon ES (1997) Robust fault diagnosis based on clustered symptom trees. Control Eng. Practice 5: 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K (1998) Learning Switching Kalman Filter Models. Compaq Cambridge Research Lab Tech Report 98–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K (2001a) The Bayes Net Toolbox for Matlab. In: Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of Interface, 33: in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K (2001b) Bayes Net Toolbox for Matlab, University of California, Berkeley, http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~murphyk/Bayes/bnt.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson AE, Brady JM (1994) Dynamic Belief networks for discrete monitoring. IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics 24: 1593–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewoods NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Q, Leitch RR, Coghill GM (1993) Fuzzy qualitative modelling. In: IEE Colloquim on Two decades of fuzzy control-Part 2 Digest No. 1993/118, pp 3/1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan JS, Kramer MA (1993) On-line hazard aversion: A Bayes approach. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 42: 317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo CY, Kwok WK, Lee CC (1992) Application of AI techniques for fault diagnosis in power distribution system. In: First International Conference on Intelligent Systems Engineering, pp 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzafestas S, Watanabe K (1990) Modern approaches to system/sensor fault detection and diagnosis. Journal A 31: 42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedam H, Venkatasubramanian V (1997) Signed digraph based multiple fault diagnosis. Computers and Chemical Engineering 21: S655 - S660

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennersten R, Narfeldt R, Gränfors A, Sjökvist S (1995) In: Proc. of the 11th symposium on Loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries, pp 661–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennersten R, Narfeldt R, Gränfors A, Sjökvist S (1996) Process modelling in fault diagnosis. Computers and Chemical Engineering 20: S665 - S6670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willsky AS (1976) A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems. Automatica 12: 601–611

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Martin EB, Morris AJ (1996) Fault detection and diagnosis using multivariate statistical techniques. IChemE Transactions of the Institute of Chemical Engineers, Part A. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 74: 89–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlsson, T.O., Wennersten, R. (2002). Bayesian Networks in Decision Support. In: Ruan, D., Fantoni, P.F. (eds) Power Plant Surveillance and Diagnostics. Power Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04945-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04945-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07754-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04945-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics