Abstract
In feedback cancellation in hearing aids, an adaptive filter is used to model the feedback path. The output of the adaptive filter is subtracted from the microphone signal to cancel the acoustic and mechanical feedback picked up by the microphone, thus allowing more gain in the hearing aid. In general, the feedback cancellation filter adapts on the hearing-aid input signal, and signal cancellation and coloration artifacts can occur for a narrowband input. The goal in feedback cancellation is to design an algorithm that is computationally efficient, provides 10 dB or more of additional amplifier headroom, and is free from processing artifacts.
This chapter begins with a steady-state analysis of the effects of acoustic feedback on the hearing-aid response. This analysis illustrates the factors that can affect the accuracy of the adaptive filter and the filter convergence for systems adapting with or without a probe signal. The characteristics of the feedback path being modeled are then described. An additional concern in designing signal processing for a hearing aid are the processing constraints imposed by a low-power portable device, and these concerns are discussed next. Two forms of constrained adaptation are then derived, and simulation results are used to give a comparison of the constrained adaptation with the conventional unconstrained approach for a system adapting without a probe signal. Further improvements in feedback cancellation performance, particularly a reduction in audible processing artifacts, can be achieved by using the filtered-X algorithm, and this approach is described next.
The performance of feedback cancellation is ultimately limited by the characteristics of the room in which the listener is located since the room reflections form part of the feedback path. The chapter concludes with a study of the feedback path in a room along with the feedback cancellation performance for an 8-, 16-, or 32-tap adaptive FIR filter in series with a five-pole nonadaptive filter, and the performance limitations imposed by the room reverberation are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. F. Lybarger, “Acoustic feedback control,” in The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report, Studebaker and Bess, Eds., Upper Darby, PA: Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, pp. 87–90, 1982.
J. M. Kates, “A computer simulation of hearing aid response and the effects of ear canal size,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 83, pp. 1952–1963, 1988.
B. Widrow, J. M. McCool, M. G. Larimore, and C. R. Johnson, Jr., “Stationary and nonstationary learning characteristics of the LMS adaptive filter,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, pp. 1151–1162, 1976.
D. K. Bustamante, T. L. Worrell, and M. J. Williamson, “Measurement of adaptive suppression of acoustic feedback in hearing aids,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, 1989, pp. 2017–2020.
A. M. Engebretson, M. P. O’Connell, and F. Gong, “An adaptive feedback equalization algorithm for the CID digital hearing aid,” in Proc. 12th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Eng. in Medicine and Biology Soc., 1990, Part 5, pp. 2286–2287.
J. M. Kates, “Feedback cancellation in hearing aids: results from a computer simulation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 39, pp. 553–562, 1991.
O. Dyrlund and N. Bisgaard, “Acoustic feedback margin improvements in hearing instruments using a prototype DFS (digital feedback suppression) system,” Scand. Audiol., vol. 20, pp. 49–53, 1991.
A. M. Engebretson and M. French-St. George, “Properties of an adaptive feedback equalization algorithm,” J. Rehab. Res. and Devel., vol. 30, pp. 8–16, 1993.
A. Kaelin, A. Lindgren, and S. Wyrsch, “A digital frequency-domain implementation of a very high gain hearing aid with compensation for recruitment of loudness and acoustic echo cancellation,” Signal Processing, vol. 64, pp. 71– 85, 1998.
M. French-St. George, D. J. Wood, and A. M. Engebretson, “Behavioral assessment of adaptive feedback cancellation in a digital hearing aid,” J. Rehab. Res. and Devel., vol. 30, pp. 17–25, 1993.
N. Bisgaard, “Digital feedback suppression: Clinical experiences with profoundly hearing impaired,” in Recent Developments in Hearing Instrument Technology: 15th Danavox Symposium, Ed. by J. Beilin and G. R. Jensen, Kolding, Denmark, pp. 370–384, 1993.
O. Dyrlund, L. B. Henningsen, N. Bisgaard, and J. H. Jensen, “Digital feedback suppression (DFS): characterization of feedback-margin improvements in a DFS hearing instrument,” Scand. Audiol., vol. 23, pp. 135–138, 1994.
J. A. Maxwell and P. M. Zurek, “Reducing acoustic feedback in hearing aids,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, vol. 3, pp. 304–313, 1995.
S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory ( 3rd Edition ), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
M. G. Siqueira, A. Alwan, and R. Speece, “Steady-state analysis of continuous adaptation systems in hearing aids,” in Proc. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 1997.
P. Estermann and A. Kaelin, “Feedback cancellation in hearing aids: Results from using frequency-domain adaptive filters,” in Proc. IEEE ISCAS, 1994.
W. G. Knecht, “Some notes on feedback suppression with adaptive filters in hearing aids,” in Proc. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 1997, session 2, paper 3.
J. M. Kates, “Constrained adaptation for feedback cancellation in hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 106, pp. 1010–1019, 1999.
S. Gao, S. Soli, and H.-F. Chi, “Band-limited adaptive feedback canceller for hearing aids,” Int. Patent Application WO 00019605 A2, filed Sept. 30, 1999.
J. Hellgren, “Analysis of feedback cancellation in hearing aids with filtered-X LMS and the direct method of closed loop identification,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, vol. 10, pp. 119–131, 2002.
J. Hellgren, T. Lunner, and S. Arlinger, “Variations in the feedback of hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 106, pp. 2821–2833, 1999.
J. M. Kates, “Room reverberation effects in hearing aid feedback cancellation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 109, pp. 367–378, 2001.
J. Macrae, “Vents for high-powered hearing aids,” The Hearing Journal, pp. 13–16, Jan. 1983.
T. Schneider and D. G. Jamieson, “A dual-channel MLS-based test system for hearing-aid characterization,” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 41, pp. 583–594, 1993.
W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–213 (Section 7.4: Generation of Random Bits), 1986.
C. Dunn and M. O. Hawksford, “Distortion immunity of MLS-derived impulse response measurements,” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 41, pp. 314–335, 1993.
J. Vanderkooy, “Aspects of MLS measuring systems,” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 42, pp. 219–231, 1994.
M. R. Schroeder, “Integrated-impulse method measuring sound decay without using impulses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 66 (2), pp. 497–500, 1979.
J. Borish and J. B. Angell, “An efficient algorithm for measuring the impulse response using pseudorandom noise,” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 31, pp. 478–488, 1983.
D. D. Rife and J. Vanderkooy, “Transfer-function measurement with maximum-length sequences,” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 37, pp. 419–444, 1989.
L. Ljung, System Identification: Theory for the User, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987.
H. Cox, R. M. Zeskind, and M. M. Owen, “Robust adaptive beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, and Sig. Proc., vol. ASSP-35, pp. 1365–1375, 1987.
Y. Haneda, S. Makino, and Y. Kaneda, “Common acoustical pole and zero modeling of room transfer functions,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, vol. 2, pp. 320–328, 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kates, J.M. (2003). Adaptive Feedback Cancellation in Hearing Aids. In: Benesty, J., Huang, Y. (eds) Adaptive Signal Processing. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11028-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11028-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05507-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-11028-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive