Skip to main content

Learning by Burning

  • Conference paper
Economic Theory of Natural Resources
  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a model of optimal natural resource depletion with endogeneous technical progress. The form of technical progress chosen is that of learning by doing in the use of the natural resource. The model is outlined and necessary conditions for optimality are obtained and interpreted. The principal object of the analysis is to discuss the appropriate Hotelling rule for this economy. The reason for concentrating on this rule is that explicit analysis of the optimal solution will require detailed specifications of the functions in the model whereas the Hotelling rule merely relates the derivatives of these functions. The Hotelling rule for this economy differs from the usual one [see for example Ingham/Simmons] of equilibrium in asset markets. Decentralisation of the optimal plan requires firms in the economy to have access to a full set of future markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. : The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. Review of Economic Studies 29, 1962, 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C.: On Putty-Clay. Review of Economic Studies 35, 1968, 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, G., and M. Kemp: Variational Methods in Economics. Amsterdam 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, A. : Some historical notes on natural resource models. University of Southampton, (mimeo) 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, A., and P. Simmons: Natural Resources and Growing Population. Review of Economic Studies 42, 1975, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M., and N. Schwartz: Optimal Exhaustible Resource Depletion with Endogenous Technical Change. Review of Economic Studies 45, 1978, 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D.: The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, P.: Who Unbound Prometheus? Science and Technical Change, 1600–1800. Science in Society, 1600–1900. Ed. by P. Mathias. Cambridge 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, A. : Optimal Technical Progress with Exhaustible Resources. Exhaustible Resources, Optimally and Trade. Ed. by M. Kemp and N.V. Long. Amsterdam 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ingham, A. (1982). Learning by Burning. In: Eichhorn, W., Henn, R., Neumann, K., Shephard, R.W. (eds) Economic Theory of Natural Resources. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41575-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41575-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0274-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-41575-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics