Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Instrumentation (Techniques, File Systems, File Types, and Techniques)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Concise Guide to Endodontic Procedures

  • 2559 Accesses

Abstract

The success of non-surgical endodontic root canal treatment requires the use of files and instruments to remove necrotic and infected tissues. The cleaning and shaping are separate concepts but are always performed together. The goal of cleaning the root canal is the removal of necrotic pulp and infected tissues. The goal of shaping the canal is to maintain the apical foramen as small as possible in its original anatomic position. A good endodontic treatment outcome is dependent on the removal of necrotic pulp and infected tissues to a low level that cannot cause a flare up which will require retreatment. After a straight-line access cavity has been cut to allow direct access of the instruments into the root canals, and the orifices of the root canals have been identified. The next step is to instrument the root canals. The instrumentation process can be simplified by dividing the procedure in a series of steps. The majority of teeth are approximately 19-25 mm in length. Most roots are 9-15mm and most crowns are 10mm in length. An easy concept is to divide the root canal into three regions; coronal, middle and apical. Each of these regions is likely to be between 3-5mm in length. Dividing the root canal into three regions is a helpful strategy for instrumenting complicated calcified root canals with a challenging morphology. It is necessary to accurately measure tooth length in order to carry out and fulfill the basic tenets of root canal therapy. This measurement should be 0.5mm to 1mm short of the radiographic apical foramen, to create an apical stop within the tooth structure in order to confine instrumentation and the filling material. The radiograhic length is the length of the tooth as it appears on the radiograph. The estimated working length is the radiographic length minus 1mm. The final working length is -1mm substracted from the anatomical apex measure from the working length radiograph. NiTi rotary instruments have proved to be extremely successful for cleaning and shaping root canals, but they should not be used when the dentinal walls are extremely thin to avoid perforation of the root canal. Curved canals are the most challenging to instrument, because the distortion of the files and instruments will cut into the curve to reduce its angle, and place pressure on the cutting tips in an opposite direction, thereby increasing the risk of cutting a perforation. The risk of cutting a perforation in curved canals increases when larger file sizes are used. To avoid perforations, the concept of anti-curvature filing is to prepare a straight line access through the root canal to the apical region, by filing away the bulky root structure to create a displacement space, and by not touching the thin root walls which are in danger of being perforated. When a perforation occurs, it should be repaired immediately using restorative materials, with a thin liner of MTA being placed against the vital periodontal tissues or bone. The prognosis of a perforated tooth depends on the size, location, and the time taken to repair it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18:269–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabala CL, Biggs JT. A standard predetermined endodontic preparation concept. Compendium. 1991;12:656, 658, 660.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alves Vde O. Endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110(5):e68–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akbar I, Iqbal A, Al-Omiri MK. Flare-up rate in molars with periapical radiolucency in one-visit vs two-visit endodontic treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14:414–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nobuhara WK, del Rio CE. Incidence of periradicular pathoses in endodontic treatment failures. J Endod. 1993;19:315–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siqueira Jr JF. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J. 2003;36(7):453–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: clinical implications and recommendations. Quintessence Int. 2012;43:15–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paqué F, Balmer M, Attin T, Peters OA. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2010;36:703–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pujar M, Bhagwat SV. Determination of the morphological irregularities in the middle and apical 1/3rd region of the root canal system of permanent maxillary incisors. Indian J Dent Res. 2002;13:96–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruddle CJ. Current concepts for preparing the root canal system. Dent Today. 2001;20:76–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. American Association of Endodontists, Colleages for Excellence, Rotary instrumentation: an endodontic perspective. American Association of Endodontists; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J. 2014;216:299–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu WC, Gyamfi J, Niu LN, Schoeffel GJ, Liu SY, Santarcangelo F, Khan S, Tay KC, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents involving facial ecchymosis – a review. J Dent. 2013;41:935–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchanan LS. The standardized-taper root canal preparation–part 6. GT file technique in abruptly curved canals. Int Endod J. 2001;34:250–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J. 1998;31:384–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grove CJ. A new simple standardized technique producing perfect fitting impermeable root canal filings extended to the dentinocemento junction. Dent Items Interest. 1928;50:855–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siqueira J, Rôças I. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34:1291–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yusuf H. The significance of the presence of foreign material periapically as a cause of failure of root treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54:566–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Georgopoulou M, Anastassiadis P, Sykaras S. Pain after chemomechanical preparation. Int Endod J. 1986;19:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16:498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008;41:6–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation. Part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J. 1998;31:394–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39:921–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Melius B, Jiang J, Zhu Q. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography. J Endod. 2002;28:125–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2010;36:1753–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meares WA, Steiman HR. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod. 2002;28:595–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan W, Fan B, Gutmann JL, Bian Z, Fan MW. Evaluation of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators using glass tubules. Int Endod J. 2006;39:127–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Özsezer E, İnan U, Aydin U. In vivo evaluation of ProPex electronic apex locator. J Endod. 2007;33:974–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malterud M. Minimally invasive biomimetic endodontics: the future is here. Gen Dent. 2013;61:8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kim HC, Sung SY, Ha JH, Solomonov M, Lee JM, Lee CJ, Kim BM. Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation. J Endod. 2013;39:1572–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar: a literature review. J Endod. 2007;33:1031–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Musikant BL, Cohen BI, Deutsch AS. The evolution of instrumentation and obturation leading to a simplified approach. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21:980–6, 988, 990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. Spreader penetration during lateral compaction of resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod. 2006;32:52–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pérez Heredia M, Clavero González J, Ferrer Luque CM, González Rodríguez MP. Apical seal comparison of low-temperature thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique and lateral condensation with two different master cones. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:E175–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Diemer F, Sinan A, Calas P. Penetration depth of warm vertical Gutta-Percha pluggers: impact of apical preparation. J Endod. 2006;32:123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Testori T, Badino M, Castagnola M. Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: a clinical survey of 36 cases. J Endod. 1993;19:87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ivanovic V, Beljic-Ivanovic K. Determining working length or how to locate the apical terminus (part I). Roots. 2009;4:30–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Aziz A, Chandler NP, Hauman CH, Leichter JW, McNaughton A, Tompkins GR. Infection of apical dentin and root-end cavity disinfection. J Endod. 2012;38:1387–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Eldeeb ME, Boraas JC. The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. Int Endod J. 1985;18:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod. 1983;9:475–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Card SJ, Sigurdsson A, Orstavik D, Trope M. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod. 2002;28:779–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association Standard No. 28—root canal files and reamers, type, Chicago, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tarniţă D, Tarniţă DN, Bîzdoacă N, Mîndrilă I, Vasilescu M. Properties and medical applications of shape memory alloys. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50:15–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A. Nickel-titanium instruments: applications in endodontics. St. Louis: Ishiaku EuroAmerica; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a focused review. Odontology. 2012;100:130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Saunders EM, Saunders WP. The challenge of preparing the curved root canal. Dent Update. 1997;24(241–4):246–7.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF. Recurrent apical periodontitis and late endodontic treatment failure related to coronal leakage: a case report. J Endod. 2011;37:1171–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Carrotte P. Endodontics: part 8. Filling the root canal system. Br Dent J. 2004;197:667–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing. J Endod. 2005;31:863–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Heling I, Gorfil C, Slutzky H, Kopolovic K, Zalkind M, Slutzky-Goldberg I. Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedures: review and treatment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:674–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tidmarsh BG. Accidental perforation of the roots of teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1979;6:235–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Abou-Rass M, Jann JM, Jobe D, Tsutsui F. Preparation of space for posting: effect on thickness of canal walls and incidence of perforation in molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1982;104:834–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sinai IH. Endodontic perforations: their prognosis and treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977;95:90–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Main C, Mirzayan N, Shabahang S, Torabinejad M. Repair of root perforations using mineral trioxide aggregate: a long-term study. J Endod. 2004;30:80–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bryan EB, Woollard G, Mitchell WC. Nonsurgical repair of furcal perforations: a literature review. Gen Dent. 1999;47:274–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Roda RS. Root perforation repair: surgical and nonsurgical management. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13:467–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus in furcation perforation repair. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16:462–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Aminov L, Moscalu M, Melian A, Salceanu M, Hamburda T, Vataman M. Clinical-radiological study on the role of biostimulating materials in iatrogenic furcation lesions. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012;116:907–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tavassoli-Hojjati S, Kameli S, Rahimian-Emam S, Ahmadyar M, Asgary S. Calcium enriched mixture cement for primary molars exhibiting root perforations and extensive root resorption: report of three cases. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hartwell GR, England MC. Healing of furcation perforations in primate teeth after repair with decalcified freeze-dried bone: a longitudinal study. J Endod. 1993;19:357–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Al-Sabek F, Shostad S, Kirkwood KL. Preferential attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to the resin ionomer Geristore. J Endod. 2005;31:205–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Karunakaran JV, Kumar SS, Kumar M, Chandrasekhar S, Namitha D. The effects of various irrigating solutions on intra-radicular dentinal surface: an SEM analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4 Suppl 2:S125–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endodontics, Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA

    Peter Murray

Authors
  1. Peter Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murray, P. (2015). Instrumentation (Techniques, File Systems, File Types, and Techniques). In: A Concise Guide to Endodontic Procedures. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43730-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43730-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43729-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43730-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation