Skip to main content

Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sava River

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to provide the overview of the water status, state of the biological diversity, and protected areas along the Sava River as well as to underline the necessity of identification and implementation of effective conservation measures. The chapter is based on historical data on environment and recent investigation on macroinvertebrate communities (2011–2012). Ecological status of water bodies within the Sava River basin ranges from high to poor, while the ecological status of the majority of water bodies is assessed as moderate, which indicates the necessity of design and implementation of relevant mitigation measures. The assessment of water quality and ecological status of the river Sava based on the macroinvertebrates community, alongside with the use of several standard biological methods and regional biotic index BNBI indicates a high correlation of the obtained results. BNBI has proven to be a method reliable enough for both the assessment of water quality and the assessment of ecological status of large rivers. Based on the results of water status assessment, the Sava River could be divided into three zones. The best water quality was recorded within the Slovenian stretch of the river, being within the limits of betamesosaprobic zone, while the ecological status was assessed as a good one. The middle part of the Sava River, stretching mainly through Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, has a somewhat worse water quality, approaching the limit of betamesosaprobic zone, while the ecological status in this part of the flow was also determined as a “good” one. The lower parts of the Sava River flow through Serbia are by all indicators more heavily polluted; the water quality is on the border between beta- and alfamesosaprobic zones, while the ecological status is between “good” and “moderate.” The biodiversity of the Sava River may be considered significant, when compared to similar watercourses of Central Europe and Balkan Peninsula. The work contains a more detailed analysis of the biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish of the main flow of the Sava River. Based on the condition of biodiversity of these groups, the river’s ecosystem is divided into three “macrohabitats.” The first macrohabitat includes the upper rhithron parts of the river through Slovenia, with a significant diversity of stenovalent groups of macroinvertebrates (larvae EPT) and salmonid species of fish (brown trout, grayling, and huchen trout). The second macrohabitat includes the parts of the flow through Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina with significant diversity of invertebrates from the groups Odonata, Mollusca, Hirudinea, and Chironomidae and fish from the families of Cyprinidae, Percidae, and Gobiidae. The highest number of protected species of fish has been registered in this section. The third “macrohabitat” includes the lower part of the potamon of the Sava River and mostly flows through Serbia wherein this part of the flow represents the most important habitat of the globally endangered and fishing-wise important sturgeon species of sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) in this river. It is characterized by a decreased biodiversity of macroinvertebrates in the main flow of the river and a significant diversity in the flood zones. In the biodiversity of fish, the highest number of allochthonous species appears. In this section, the diversity of fish in flood zones especially as the habitat of endangered species such as Umbra krameri, Misgurnus fossilis, and Carassius carassius is also important. Research has shown that in order to perform a successful conservation of large river biodiversity, the ecosystem must be observed as a complex consisting of the main flow of the river, flood zone, and its tributaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Matoničkin I, Pavletić Z, Habdija I, Stilinović B (1975) Prilog valorizaciji voda ekosistema rijeke Save. Sveučilišna Naklada Liber 95, Zagreb. [Contribution to evaluation of the Sava River ecosystem. University of Zagreb and Liber University press 95]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wright FJ (1995) Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing water. Aust J Ecol 20:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WFD (2000) EU Water Framework Directive: Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy

  4. Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (1993) Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (eds) Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghetti PF, Salmoiraghi G (1994) Macroinvertebrate communities and the changing italian rivers. Boll Zool 61(4):409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D (eds) (2012).The taxa and autecology database for freshwater organisms version 5.0. www.frechwaterecology.info. Accessed 20 June 2013

  7. Simić V, Simić S (1999) Use of the river macrozoobenthos of Serbia to formulate a biotic index. Hydrobiologia 416:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mouquet N, Gravel D, Massol F, Calcagno V (2013) Extending the concept of keystone species to communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 16:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimitrijević MD (ed) (2000) Geological atlas of Serbia 1: 2.000.000. Ministry of mining and energetic, Republic of Serbia

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISRBC (2009) Sava River Basin Analysis Report. International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC), Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walter H (1962) Die Vegetation der Erde in oekophysiologischer Betrachtung. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walter H, Lieth H (1964) Klimadiagramm-Weltatlas. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tukhanen S (1980) Climatic parameters and indices in plant geography. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 67:1–105

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karadžić B, Šašo-Jovanović V, Jovanović Z, Popović R (1998) ‘FLORA’ a database and software for floristic and vegetation analyses. In: Tsekos I, Moustakas M (eds) Progress in botanical research. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 69–72

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karadžić B (2013) FLORA. A Software package for statistical analysis of ecological data. Water Res Manag 3:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nejgebauer V, Ćirić M, Filipovski G, Škorić A, Živković M (1963) Klasifikacija zemljišta Jugoslavije (Classification of Soils of Yugoslavia). II Kongres Jugoslovenskog društva za proučavanje zemljišta. Ohrid, Yugoslavia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Filipovski G, Nejgebauer V, Ćirić M, Škorić A, Živković M (1964) Soil classification in Yugoslavia. VIIth international congress of soil science, Bucharest, Romania

    Google Scholar 

  19. Živković B, Nejgebauer KV, Tanasijević Đ, Miljković N, Stojković L, Drezgić P (1972) Soils of Vojvodina. Institute for Agricultural Investigations, Novi Sad

    Google Scholar 

  20. Škorić A, Filipovski G, Ćirić M (1973) Classification of Soils of Yugoslavia. Zavod za pedologiju Poljoprivrednog i Šumarskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Zagreb, Yugoslavia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Škorić A, Filipovski, G, Ćirić, M (1985) Classification of soils of Yugoslavia. Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, Posebna izdanja, knjiga LXXVIII, Sarajevo, Yugoslavia

    Google Scholar 

  22. Antić M, Jović N, Avdalović V (1982) Evoluciono-genetske serije zemljišta Srbije—Zemljište i biljka. Beogradd 31:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  23. Antonić O, Pernar N, Jelaska SD (2003) Spatial distribution of main forest soil groups in Croatia as a function of basic pedogenetic factors. Ecol Model 170:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Protić N, Martinović LJ, Miličić B, Stevanović D, Mojasević M (2005) The status of soil surveys in Serbia and Montenegro. In: Jones RJA, Houšková B, Bullock P, Montanarella L (eds) Soil resources of Europe, 2nd edn. European Soil Bureau Research Report No. 9, EUR 20559 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 297–315

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bašić F (2005) Soil resources of Croatia. In: Jones RJA, Houšková B, Bullock P, Montanarella L (eds) Soil resources of Europe, 2nd edn. European Soil Bureau Research Report No. 9, EUR 20559 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 297–315

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vidojević D, Manojlović M (2007) Overview of soil information and policies in Serbia. In: Hengl T, Panagos P, Jones A, Tóth G (eds) Status and prospect of soil information in southeastern Europe: soil databases, projects and application. European Commission Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 87–100

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mesić H, Major Z, Vranaričić M, Čidić A (2007) Croatian soil information system within the environment information system. In: Hengl T, Panagos P, Jones A, Tóth G (eds) Status and prospect of soil information in southeastern Europe: soil databases, projects and application. European Commission Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 43–54

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krsnik P, Zupan M, Lobnik F (2007) Overview of soil information and soil protection policies in Slovenia. In: Hengl T, Panagos P, Jones A, Tóth G (eds) Status and prospect of soil information in southeastern Europe: soil databases, projects and application. European Commission Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 101–109

    Google Scholar 

  29. SRBMP (2013) The Sava River Basin Management Plan—Draft. The international Sava River Basin Commission and European Commission and Sava Countries. p 236

    Google Scholar 

  30. ASTERICS assessment software 3.1.1. www.fliessgewaesser-bewertung.de

  31. Zelinka M, Marvan P (1961) Zur Pra¨zisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fließender Gewa¨sser. Archiv fu¨r Hydrobiologie 57:389–407

    Google Scholar 

  32. Armitage PD, Moss D, Wright JF, Furse MT (1983) The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Res 17:333–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. De Pauw N, Vanhooren G (1983) Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia 100:135–168

    Google Scholar 

  34. Washington HG (1984) Diversity, biotic and similarity indices—a review with special relevances to aquatic ecosystems. Water Res 18(6):653–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Robinson Ch T (eds) (2009) Rivers of Europe. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Simonović P, Simić V, Simić S, Paunović M (eds) (2010) The Danube in Serbia—the results of National Program of the Second Joint Danube Survey. Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Belgrade and University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Kragujevac

    Google Scholar 

  37. IUCN (2012) The IUCN red list of threatened species, 2012. 2. www.iucnredlist.org

  38. Simonovic P (2001) Ribe Srbije. Zavod za zastitu prirode Srbije i Bioloski faultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Belgrade, 1247 p

    Google Scholar 

  39. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 5/10

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mrakovčić M, Brigić A, Buj I, Čaleta M, Mustafić P, Zanella D (2006) Crvena knjiga slatkovodnih riba Hrvatske. Ministarstvo kulture, Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  41. Simić V, Simić S, Petrović A, Paunović M, Šorić V, Dimitrijević V (2006) Biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems in Serbia, ex situ conservation (BAES ex situ). http://baes.pmf.kg.ac.rs

  42. Govedič M, Bedjanič M, Grobelnik V, Kapla A, Kus Veenvliet J, Šalamun A, Veenvliet P, Vrezec A (2007) Dodatne raziskave kvalifikacijskih vrst Natura 2000 s predlogom spremljanja stanja—raki (kočno poročilo). Naročnik: Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor, Ljubljana. Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Miklavž na Dravskem polju, 127 pp

    Google Scholar 

  43. Official Gazette of the RS, 102/2010 (2010) Uredba o ekološkoj mreži—Decree on Ecological Network

    Google Scholar 

  44. Life Project (2009) Protection of biodiversity of the Sava River Basin floodplains results of life project protection of biodiversity of the Sava River Basin floodplains http://www.savariver.com

  45. Natura (2000) Council Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds and Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna

    Google Scholar 

  46. Council of Europe (1979) ETS 104—Convention on the conservation of wildlife and natural habitats (Bern Convention)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds

    Google Scholar 

  48. Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal L 206, 22 July 1992

    Google Scholar 

  49. Karadžić B, Mijović A (eds) (2007) Environment in Serbia-an indicator based review. Serbian Environmental Protection Agency, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stevanović V (1999) The red data book of flora of Serbia. Extinct and critically endangered taxa. Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Institution for Protection of Nature of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pavlović P, Mitrović M, Djurdjević L (2004) An ecophysiological study of plants growing on the fly ash deposits from the “Nikola Tesla-A” thermal power station in Serbia. Environ Manage 33:654–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Djurdjević L, Mitrović M, Pavlović P, Gajić G, Kostić O (2006) Phenolic acids as bioindicators of fly ash deposit revegetation. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mitrović M, Pavlović P, Lakušić D, Djurdjević L, Stevanović B, Kostić O, Gajić G (2008) The potential of Festuca rubra and Calamagrostis epigejos for the revegetation of fly ash deposits. Sci Total Environ 407:338–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kostić O, Mitrović M, Knežević M, Jarić S, Gajić G, Djurdjević L, Pavlović P (2012) The potential of four woody species for the revegetation of fly ash deposits from the “Nikola Tesla –A” thermoelectric plant (Obrenovac, Serbia). Arch Biol Sci 64(1):145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gross ME (2003) Allelopathy of aquatic autotrophs. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:313–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Richardson DM (1998) Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv Biol 12:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmanek M, Barbour MG, DanePanetta F, Carol J (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mitrović-Josipović M, Dedijer A, Karadžić B (2007) Dinamika cvetanja i produkcija polena ambrozije. In: Janjić V, Vrbičanin S (eds) Abrozija. Herbološko društvo Srbije, Srbije, pp 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  60. Devidé Z (1956) Echinocystis lobata (Michx.) Torr. et Gray, a new adventitious plant of the Croatian flora (Croat.). Acta Bot Croat XIV–XV:186–187

    Google Scholar 

  61. Marković LJ (1973) Die Flutrasengesellschaften in der Umgebung von Zagreb. Ber Geobot Inst ETH Stiftg Rubel Zurich 51:198–205

    Google Scholar 

  62. Marković L (1984) Zur Verbreitung und Vergesellschaftung von Impatiens glandulifera in Kroatien. Acta Bot Slov Acad Sci Slov Ser A Suppl 1:209–215

    Google Scholar 

  63. Markovi LJ, Hulina N (1970) Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. u širem području Zagreba. Acta Bot Croat 29:213–215

    Google Scholar 

  64. Trinajstić I (1976) Hronoloska klasifikacija antropohora. Fragmenta Herbologica Jugoslavica 2:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  65. Trinajstić I (1977) Chronological classification of the Antropochors. Fragm Herbol Jugosl 2:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hulina N (1998) Rare, endangered or vulnerable plants and neophytes in a drainage system in Croatia. Nat Croat 7(4):279–289

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hulina N (2010) “Planta Hortifuga ” in Flora of the continental part of Croatia. Agric Conspec Sci 75:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ilijanić LJ, Marković LJ, Stančić Z (1994) Impatiens balfourii Hooker fil. u Hrvatskoj. Acta Bot Croat 53:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pandža M, Franjić J, Trinajstić I, Škvorc Ž, Stančić Z (2001) The most recent state of affairs in the distribution of some neophytes in Croatia. Nat Croat Zagreb 10:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vasić O (2005) Echinocystis lobata (Michx) Torrey et A. Gray in Serbia. Acta Bot Croat 64:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  71. DAISIE (2010) Handbook of Alien species in Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org

  72. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2005) Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: van der Maarel E (ed) Vegetation ecology. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 332–355

    Google Scholar 

  73. Povž M, Sket B (1990) Naše sladkovodne ribe. Mladinska knjiga, Ljubljana, 370 pp

    Google Scholar 

  74. Munda A (1926) Nekaj statističnih podatkov o sulčji lovi v Savi in v Ljubljanici. Ribarski odsek Kmetijskega instituta, 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  75. Munda A (1927) Ribe v Slovenskih vodah. Slovensko ribarsko društvo, Ljubljani, 192 pp

    Google Scholar 

  76. Munda A (1935) Die Kunstliche zuch des Huchen in Jugoslawien und die hiebei gewonnenen biologischen Erfahrungen. Verhandlungen der internationalen Vereinigung fur theoretsche und augewandte Limnologie. pp 313–320

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sivec I (1979) Prispevek k poznavanju favne vrbnic (Plecoptera, Insecta) v Sloveniji. Biol Vestn 27:165–174

    Google Scholar 

  78. Sivec I (1982) A new apterous species of Leuctra (Plecoptera: Leuctridae) from Slovenia. Yugoslav Aquat Insect 2:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Mikavica D, Kosorić Đ, Savić N, Vuković D (2006) Rezultati ihtiološkog istraživanja rijeke Save u Bosni i Hercegovini od ušća Une do ušća Vrbasa. Naučni simpozij “Gospodarenje ribljim resursima i ribolovnim područjima Drava—Dunav i Sava” Zbornik priopćenja. Osijek, pp 53–54

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mikavica D, Savić N (1999) Ribe rijeke Drine. Poljoprivredni fakultet, Banjoj Luci

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sommerwerk N, Hein T, Schneider-Jakoby M et al (2009) The Danube River Basin. In: Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Robinson CT (eds) Rivers of Europe. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  82. Škrijelj R, Đug S, Korjenić E, Mitrašinović-Brulić M, Šljuka S, Gajević M (2011) Ihtiološka istraživanja sliva rijeke Save u Federaciji Bosne i Hercegovine. Centar za ihtiologiju i ribarstvo Prirodno-matematičkog fakulteta Sarajevo, Agencija za vodno područje rijeke Save, Sarajevo

    Google Scholar 

  83. Trontelj P, Machino Y, Sket B (2005) Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in the crayfish genus Austropotamobius inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34:212–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Kottelat M, Freyhof J (2007) Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Publications Kottelat, Cornol, 646 p

    Google Scholar 

  85. Freyhof J (2011) Umbra krameri. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2012.2. www.iucnredlist.org

  86. IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe (2009) New habitat of Umbra krameri. IUCN South-Eastern European e-bulletin 20, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  87. Leiner S (1995) The status of the European mudminnow, Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792, Croatia. Ann Naturhist Mus Wien 97B:486–490

    Google Scholar 

  88. Simić SB, Karadžić VR, Cvijan MV, Božica VM (2014) Algal communities along the Sava River. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  89. Karadžić B, Jarić S, Pavlović P, Mitrović M (2014) Aquatic and wetland vegetation along the Sava River. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ostojić AM, Radojević ID, Balkić AG (2014) Zooplankton community along the Sava River. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  91. Lucić A, Paunović M, Tomović J, Kovačević S, Zorić K, Simić V, Atanacković A, Marković V, Kračun M, Hudina S, Lajtner J, Gottstein S, Milošević Đ, Anđus S, Žganec K (2014) Aquatic macroinvertebrates of the Sava River. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  92. Simonović P, Povž M, Piria M, Treer T, Adrović A, Škrijelj R, Nikolić V, Simić V (2014) Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  93. Crnobrnja-Isailović J, Adrović A, Ćaleta M, Ćosić N, Jelić D, Kotrošan D, Lisičić D, Marinković S, Poboljšaj K, Presetnik P, Sekulić G (2014) Fauna of the riparian ecosystems—amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  94. Lenhardt M, Finn RN, Cakić P, Kolarević J, Krpo-Ćetković J, Radović I, Fyhn HJ (2005) Analysis of the post-vitellogenic oocytes of the three species of the Danube Acipenseridae: beluga (Huso huso), Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) and sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus). Belg J Zool 134:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  95. Lenhardt M, Jaric I, Kalauzi A, Cvijanovic G (2006) Assessment of extinction risk and reasons for decline in sturgeon. Biodivers Conserv 15:1967–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Brennan S, Withgott J (2005) Biodiversity and conservation biology. In: Environment, the sciences behind the stories. Pearson, Bewamin Cummings. San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  97. Marić S, Sušnik S, Simonović P, Snoj A (2006) Phylogeographic study of brown trout from Serbia, based on mitochondrial DNA control region analysis. Genet Sel Evol 38:411–430. doi:10.1051/gse:2006012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Marić S, Razpet A, Nikolić V, Simonović P (2011) Genetic differentiation of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) populations in Serbia, based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses. Genet Sel Evol 43:2. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-43-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Jug T, Berrebi P, Snoj A (2005) Distribution of non-native trout in Slovenia and their introgression with native trout populations as observed through microsatellite DNA analysis. Biol Conserv 123(3):381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladica Simić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simić, V. et al. (2015). Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin. In: Milačič, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M. (eds) The Sava River. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics