Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

In this chapter, we illustrate how the MCDA process can be supported by the use of a decision aiding software called diviz. The diviz workbench allows to build, execute and share complex workflows of MCDA algorithms, and as such, is a convenient tool to help the analyst in the decision aiding process. We start by a presentation of diviz, before switching to the detailed description of a didactic MCDA process, based on a classical example from the MCDA literature. We show how each major step of this process can be backed up by diviz, and how the software can help to build the final recommendation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bisdorff, R., Meyer, P., & Veneziano, T. (2009). Inverse analysis from a Condorcet robustness denotation of valued outranking relations. In F. Rossi, & A. Tsoukiàs (Eds.), Algorithmic decision theory. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 5783, pp. 180–191). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A., & Vincke, P. (2000). Evaluation and decision models: A critical perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brans, J.-P., & Vincke, P. (1985). A preference ranking organization method. Management Science, 31(6), 647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decision Deck Consortium. (2009). Strategic manifesto of the Decision Deck project, http://www.decision-deck.org/manifesto.html.

  • Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., & Meyer, P. (2008). A review of capacity identification methods for Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory; Applications of the Kappalab R package. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 766–785. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, Y. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10,151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P., & Bigaret, S. (2012). diviz: A software for modeling, processing and sharing algorithmic workflows in MCDA. Intelligent Decision Technologies, 6(4), 283–296. doi:10.3233/IDT-2012-0144.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.org [ISBN 3-900051-00-3].

  • Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Revue française d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelle (RIRO), 2, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bigaret, S., Meyer, P. (2015). Supporting the MCDA Process with the diviz workbench. In: Bisdorff, R., Dias, L., Meyer, P., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M. (eds) Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46816-6_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics