Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

  • 1515 Accesses

Abstract

As the previous chapters have shown, the possible ways of representing linguistic data as a graph are as diverse as the data itself. For the process of graph modeling, the decision as to what information will be represented as nodes and what information as relations is of great importance. In addition, what kind of added value is going to be expected by the representation of the data as a graph and what kinds of scientific questions should be answerable by the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berglund, A., Boag, S., Chamberlin, D., Fernández, M.F., Kay, M., Robie, J., Siméon, J.: XML Path Language (XPath). Version 2.0, 2nd edn. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boag, S., Chamberlin, D., Fernández, M.F., Florescu, D., Robie, J., Siméon, J.: XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, 2nd edn. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bormann, C., Hoffman, P.: Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR). Specification. Internet Engineering Task Force (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bosak, J., Bray, T.: XML and the Second-Generation Web. Scientific American, 89–93 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brandes, U., Eiglsperger, M., Lerner, J.: GraphML Primer (2004), http://graphml.graphdrawing.org/primer/graphml-primer.html

  7. Brandes, U., Lerner, J., Pich, C.: GXL to GraphML and Vice Versa with XSLT. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 127(1), 113–125 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2004.12.037

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bray, T., Hollander, D., Layman, A., Tobin, R., Thompson, H.S.: Namespaces in XML 1.0, 3rd edn. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Maler, E., Yergeau, F.: Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, 5th edn. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burnard, L., Bauman, S. (eds.): TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. Text Encoding Initiative Consortium, Charlottesville (2014), Version 2.7.0. Last updated on 16th September 2014, revision 13036

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, J.: XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, J., DeRose, S.J.: XML Path Language (XPath). Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crockford, D.: The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON). Specification. Internet Engineering Task Force (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. DeRose, S.J., Maler, E., Orchard, D.: XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. DeRose, S.J., Maler, E., Orchard, D., Walsh, N.: XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.1. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ebert, J., Kullbach, B., Winter, A.: GraX – An Interchange Format for Reengineering Tools. In: Sixth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pp. 89–98. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao, S.(S.)., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Thompson, H.S.: W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 1: Structures. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herman, I., Marshall, M.S.: GraphXML – An XML-Based Graph Description Format. In: Marks, J. (ed.) GD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1984, pp. 52–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Himsolt, M.: GML: A portable Graph File Format. Tech. rep. Universitaät Passau (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holt, R.: An Introduction to TA: The Tuple Attribute Language (1997), http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~holt/papers/ta-intro.html (updated 2002)

  21. Ide, N.M.: Corpus Encoding Standard: SGML Guidelines for Encoding Linguistic Corpora. In: Proceedings of the First International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 1998), pp. 463–470. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Granada (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ide, N.M., Bonhomme, P., Romary, L.: XCES: An XML-based Encoding Standard for Linguistic Corpora. In: Proceedings of the Second International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2000), pp. 825–830. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Athen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ide, N.M., Priest-Dorman, G., Véronis, J.: Corpus Encoding Standard (CES). Tech. rep. Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards, EAGLES (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO 12620:2009. Terminology and other language and content resources — Specification of data categories and management of a Data Category Registry for language resources. International Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  25. ISO 24610-1:2006. Language Resource Management — Feature Structures – Part 1: Feature Structure Representation. International Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  26. ISO 24612:2012. Language Resource Management — Linguistic annotation framework (LAF). International Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  27. ISO 24613:2008. Language Resource Management — Lexical markup framework (LMF). International Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  28. ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003. Information technology — Document Schema Definition Language (DSDL) – Part 2: Regular-grammar-based validation – RELAX NG (ISO/IEC 19757-2). International Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kay, M.: XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 2.0. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mehler, A.: Structural Similarities of Complex Networks: A Computational Model by Example of Wiki Graphs. Applied Artificial Intelligence 22(7&8), 619–683 (2008), doi:10.1080/08839510802164085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Murata, M., Lee, D., Mani, M., Kawaguchi, K.: Taxonomy of XML Schema Languages Using Formal Language Theory. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 5(4), 660–704 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. NWB Team. Network Workbench Tool. Tech. rep. Northeastern University and University of Michigan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peterson, D., Gao, S.(S.)., Malhotra, A., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Thompson, H.S.: W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Punin, J., Krishnamoorthy, M.: XGMML (eXtensible Graph Markup and Modeling Language). XGMML 1.0 Draft Specification. Dept. of Computer Science RPI, NY (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robie, J., Chamberlin, D., Dyck, M., Snelson, J.: XQuery 3.0: An XML Query Language. W3C Candidate Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saito, R., Smoot, M.E., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P.-L., Lotia, S., Pico, A.R., Bader, G.D., Ideker, T.: A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nature Methods 9, 1069–1076 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schürr, A., Winter, A.J., Zündorf, A.: PROGRES: Language and Environment. In: Kreowski, H.-J., Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) Handbook on Graph Grammars: Applications, Languages and Tools, vol. 2, pp. 487–550. World Scientific, Singapore (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Smoot, M., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P.-L., Ideker, T.: Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 27(3), 431–432 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Burnard, L. (eds.): TEI P3: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. Published for the TEI Consortium by Humanities Computing Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stührenberg, M.: What, when, where? Spatial and temporal annotations with XStandoff. In: Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference, Montréal. Balisage Series on Markup Technologies, vol. 10 (2013), doi:10.4242/BalisageVol10.Stuhrenberg01

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stührenberg, M., Jettka, D.: A toolkit for multi-dimensional markup: The development of SGF to XStandoff. In: Proceedings of Balis-age: The Markup Conference, Montréal. Balisage Series on Markup Technologies, vol. 3 (2009), doi:10.4242/BalisageVol3.Stuhrenberg01

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stührenberg, M., Wurm, C.: Refining the Taxonomy of XML Schema Languages. A new Approach for Categorizing XML Schema Languages in Terms of Processing Complexity. In: Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference. Vol. 5. Balisage Series on Markup Technologies, Montréal (2010), doi:10.4242/BalisageVol5.Stuhrenberg01

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thompson, H.S., Beech, D., Maloney, M., Mendelsohn, N.: XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. W3C Web Ontology Working Group, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. Document Overview, 2nd edn. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Walmsley, P.: Definitive XML Schema, 2nd edn. The Charles F. Gold-farb Definitive XML Series. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Winter, A.J., Kullbach, B., Riediger, V.: An Overview of the GXL Graph Exchange Language. In: Diehl, S. (ed.) Dagstuhl Seminar 2001. LNCS, vol. 2269, pp. 324–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maik Stührenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stührenberg, M., Diewald, N., Gleim, R. (2016). Considerations for a Linguistic Network Markup Language. In: Mehler, A., Lücking, A., Banisch, S., Blanchard, P., Job, B. (eds) Towards a Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Complex Linguistic Networks. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47238-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47238-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47237-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47238-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics