Zusammenfassung
Das Befundsystem sollte kurz gefasst und organisiert sein und dabei die folgende Struktur verwenden (◘ Tab. 3.1). Eine Feststellung, die anzeigt dass die aktuelle Untersuchung mit der Voruntersuchung (den Voruntersuchungen) verglichen wurde, sollte im Bericht eingeschlossen sein (Datumsangaben). Ist dies nicht inbegriffen, sollte die Annahme gelten, dass kein Vergleich angestellt wurde; vorzugsweise sollte man allerdings angeben, dass kein Vergleich vorgenommen wurde.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Kopans DB. Basic Physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast Cancer. Radiology 2008; 246(2):348–353.
Harvey JA, Gard CC, Niglioretti DL, et al. Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition. Radiology 2013; 266(3):752–758.
21CFR Part 16 and 900: Mammography Quality Standards; Final Rule. Federal Register, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 62: No. 208: 55851–55994, October 28, 1997.
Sickles EA. Periodic Mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991; 179 (2):463–468.
Varas X. Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184(2):409–414.
Wolfe JN, Buck KA, Salane M, Parekh NJ. Xeroradiography of the breast: overview of 21,057 consecutive cases. Radiology 1987;165(2):305–311.
Helvie MA, Pennes DR, Rebner M, Adler DD. Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. Radiology 1991; 178(1):155–158.
Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et a. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001; 219(2):475–483.
Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BIRADS category 3 lesions. AJR 2002; 179(3):691–695.
Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham LA, et al. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examination with recommendation for short-interval follow-up. Radiology 2005; 234(3):684–692.
Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH et al. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 2004; 233(3):850–856.
Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. AJR 2009; 2009; 193(3):1723–1730.
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Guideline for Communication: Diagnostic Radiology. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/CommDiagImaging.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2013.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sickles, E. et al. (2016). Befundsystem. In: ACR BI-RADS®-Atlas der Mammadiagnostik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48818-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48818-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48817-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48818-8
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)