Skip to main content

Algebraic Semantics of Proto-Transitive Rough Sets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transactions on Rough Sets XX

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TRS,volume 10020))

Abstract

Rough Sets over generalized transitive relations like proto-transitive ones have been initiated recently by the present author. In a recent paper, approximation of proto-transitive relations by other relations was investigated and the relation with rough approximations was developed towards constructing semantics that can handle fragments of structure. It was also proved that difference of approximations induced by some approximate relations need not induce rough structures. In this research, the structure of rough objects is characterized and a theory of dependence for general rough sets is developed and used to internalize the Nelson-algebra based approximate semantics developed earlier by the present author. This is part of the different semantics of PRAX developed in this paper by her. The theory of rough dependence initiated in earlier papers is extended in the process. This paper is reasonably self-contained and includes proofs and extensions of representation of objects that have not been published earlier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bianucci, D., Cattaneo, G., Ciucci, D.: Entropies and co-entropies of coverings with application to incomplete information systems. Fundam. Inform. 75, 77–105 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Burmeister, P.: A Model-Theoretic Oriented Approach to Partial Algebras. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin (1986, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cattaneo, G., Ciucci, D.: Lattices with interior and closure operators and abstract approximation spaces. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Wolski, M., Chakraborty, M.K., Wu, W.-Z. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets X. LNCS, vol. 5656, pp. 67–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chajda, I., Haviar, M.: Induced pseudo orders. Acta Univ. Palack. Olomou 30(1), 9–16 (1991)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chakraborty, M.K., Samanta, P.: Consistency-degree between knowledges. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Peters, J.F., Rybiński, H., Skowron, A. (eds.) RSEISP 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4585, pp. 133–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciucci, D.: Approximation algebra and framework. Fundam. Inform. 94, 147–161 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimitrov, B.: Some Obreshkov measures of dependence and their Use. Comptes Rendus Acad Bulg. Sci. 63(1), 5–18 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganter, B., Meschke, C.: A formal concept analysis approach to rough data tables. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Sakai, H., Chakraborty, M.K., Slezak, D., Hassanien, A.E., Zhu, W. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XIV. LNCS, vol. 6600, pp. 37–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Slowinski, R.: Can Bayesian measures be useful for rough set decision making? Eng. Appl. AI 17, 345–361 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hajek, A.: Fifteen arguments against hypothetical frequentism. Erkenntnis 211(70), 211–235 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Janicki, R.: Approximations of arbitrary binary relations by partial orders: classical and rough set models. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Chan, C.-C., Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Ziarko, W.P. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XIII. LNCS, vol. 6499, pp. 17–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Järvinen, J.: Lattice theory for rough sets. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Düntsch, I., Grzymała-Busse, J.W., Orłowska, E., Polkowski, L. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets VI. LNCS, vol. 4374, pp. 400–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarvinen, J., Pagliani, P., Radeleczki, S.: Information completeness in Nelson algebras of rough sets induced by quasiorders. Stud. Logica. 101, 1–20 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarvinen, J., Radeleczki, S.: Representation of Nelson algebras by rough sets determined by quasi-orders. Algebra Univers. 66, 163–179 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Keet, C.M.: A formal theory of granules - Phd thesis. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, T.Y.: Granular computing -1: the concept of Granulation and its formal model. Int. J. Granular Comput. Rough Sets Int. Syst. 1(1), 21–42 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ljapin, E.S.: Partial Algebras and Their Applications. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Makinson, D.: General Patterns in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, vol. 3, pp. 35–110. Oxford University Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Makinson, D.: Bridges between classical and nonmonotonic logic. Logic J. IGPL 11, 69–96 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mani, A.: Algebraic semantics of similarity-based bitten rough set theory. Fundam. Inform. 97(1–2), 177–197 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mani, A.: Meaning, choice and similarity based rough set theory. In: International Conference Logic and Application, January 2009, Chennai, pp. 1–12 (2009). http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1352

  22. Mani, A.: Choice inclusive general rough semantics. Inf. Sci. 181(6), 1097–1115 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.11.016

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Mani, A.: Axiomatic granular approach to knowledge correspondences. In: Li, T., Nguyen, H.S., Wang, G., Grzymala-Busse, J., Janicki, R., Hassanien, A.E., Yu, H. (eds.) RSKT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7414, pp. 482–487. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Mani, A.: Dialectics of counting and the mathematics of vagueness. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XV. LNCS, vol. 7255, pp. 122–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Mani, A.: Contamination-free measures and Algebraic operations. In: Pal, N., et al. (ed.) Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), 2013 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. F-1438, Hyderabad, India, pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mani, A.: Dialectics of knowledge representation in a granular rough set theory. In: Refereed Conference Paper: ICLA 2013, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, pp. 1–12 (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.6519

  27. Mani, A.: Towards logics of some rough perspectives of knowledge. In: Skowron, A., Suraj, Z. (eds.) Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems - Professor Zdzisław Pawlak in Memoriam. ISRL, vol. 43, pp. 419–444. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Mani, A.: Approximation dialectics of proto-transitive rough sets. In: Chakraborty, M.K., Skowron, A., Maiti, M., Kar, A. (eds.) Facets of Uncertainties and Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 125. Springer, New Delhi (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Mani, A.: Ontology, rough Y-systems and dependence. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. 11(2), 114–136 (2014). Special Issue of IJCSA on Comput. Intell

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Mani, A.: Antichain based semantics for rough sets. In: Ciucci, D., et al. (eds.) RSKT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9436, pp. 335–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25754-9_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Mani, A.: Types of Probabilities Associated with Rough Membership Functions. In: Bhattacharyya, S., et al. (ed.) Proceedings of ICRCICN 2015: IEEE Xplore, pp. 175–180. IEEE Computer Society (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRCICN.2015.7434231

  32. Mani, A.: Probabilities, dependence and rough membership functions. Int. J. Comput. Appl. (Special Issue on Comput. Intell.), 1–27 (2016, accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moore, E.F., Shannon, C.E.: Reliable circuits using less reliable relays-I, II. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 191–208, 281–297 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pagliani, P., Chakraborty, M.: A Geometry of Approximation: Rough Set Theory: Logic, Algebra and Topology of Conceptual Patterns. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Pawlak, Z.: Decision tables and decision spaces. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Distributed Processing (SCDP 2002), 24–25 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pawlak, Z.: Some issues on rough sets. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Grzymała-Busse, J.W., Kostek, B., Świniarski, R.W., Szczuka, M.S., et al. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets I. LNCS, vol. 3100, pp. 1–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(379–423), 623–656 (1948)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Ślęzak, D.: Rough sets and bayes factor. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets III. LNCS, vol. 3400, pp. 202–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Ślȩzak, D., Wasilewski, P.: Granular sets – foundations and case study of tolerance spaces. In: An, A., Stefanowski, J., Ramanna, S., Butz, C.J., Pedrycz, W., Wang, G. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4482, pp. 435–442. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Wasilewski, P., Slezak, D.: Foundations of rough sets from vagueness perspective. In: Hassanien, A., et al. (eds.) Rough Computing: Theories, Technologies and Applications, pp. 1–37. Information Science Reference, IGI, Global, Hershey (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Yao, Y.: Information granulation and rough set approximation. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 16, 87–104 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Yao, Y.: Probabilistic approach to rough sets. Expert Syst. 20(5), 287–297 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yao, Y.: Probabilistic rough set approximations. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 49, 255–271 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets and information granularity. In: Gupta, N., et al. (eds.) Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, pp. 3–18. North Holland, Amsterdam (1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The present author would like to thank Prof Mihir Chakraborty for discussions on PRAX and the referee for drawing attention to [8] and related references in particular.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mani, A. (2016). Algebraic Semantics of Proto-Transitive Rough Sets. In: Peters, J., Skowron, A. (eds) Transactions on Rough Sets XX. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10020. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53611-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53611-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53610-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53611-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics