Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Qualification of Beneficiary Rights in Social Protection Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Erwerbsverlauf und sozialer Schutz in Europa

  • 1199 Accesses

Abstract

The challenges posed by the alignment of social protection schemes with the needs of beneficiaries according to their life course have so far been given little attention as the individual, with regard to social protection, is categorized according to risk factor segments, while the issue of qualification of beneficiary rights in the social protection system is not really touched upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) 10 September 2015 (Wojciechowski), C-408/14 § 35.

  2. 2.

    e.g. CJEU 4 February 2015 (Melchior), C-647/13; 4 December 2003 (Kristiansen), C-92/02, § 31; 5 October 2010 (Elchinov), C-173/09, § 40.

  3. 3.

    CJEU Opinion 2/13 of the Court (Full Court) of 18 December 2014 on the draft agreement on the accession of the EU to the European Convention of Human Rights; see e.g. Symon 2015, p. 4.

  4. 4.

    No 13023/87.

  5. 5.

    No 53080/13.

  6. 6.

    ECtHR 15 March 2001, Aunola v. Finland, n° 30517/96; 13 December 2016, Béláné Nágy v. Hungary, § 84.

  7. 7.

    ECtHR 12 April 2016 Stec et al., No 56731/01 and 65900/01 (§ 53).

  8. 8.

    CJEU 20 September 2001 (Grzelczyk), C-184/99, ECR I-6193.

  9. 9.

    Advocate General M. Wathelet 20 May 2014, (Dano) C-33/13; 26 March 2015 (Alimanovic), C-67/14, cf. infra; Barbou Des Places 2015; Carlier 2016.

  10. 10.

    CJEU 15 January 2014 (Association de médiation sociale), C-176/12; de la Rosa 2014, p. 705.

  11. 11.

    CJEU 7 April 2016, (ONEM) C-284/15.

  12. 12.

    CJEU 19 September 2013, (Brey) C-140/12.

  13. 13.

    CJEU Grand Chamber, 11 November 2014, C-333/13.

  14. 14.

    CJEU, 25 February 2016, (Garcia-Nieto) C-299/14.

  15. 15.

    CJEU 14 June 2016, (Commission v United Kingdom) C-308/14.

  16. 16.

    CJEU, C-67/14, § 60; see also Hennion 2015; Carlier 2016.

  17. 17.

    CJEC 25 May 1971, (Defrenne I v Belgium) C-80/70; 13 May 1986, (Bilka) 170/84; 17 May 1990, (Barber) C-262/88; 28 September 1994, (Beune) C-7/93.

  18. 18.

    CJEC 27 June 1990, (Kowalska) C-33/89, § 9.

  19. 19.

    CJEU 3 October 2013, (BKK) C-59/12.

  20. 20.

    Conclusions of Advocate General Y. Bot, 4 July 2013, (BKK) C-59/12.

  21. 21.

    Directive No 98/49/EC of 29 June 1998.

  22. 22.

    The transposition period for the implementation of the Directive terminates on 21 May 2018.

  23. 23.

    Official Journal (OJ) L 335 of 17 December 2009, cf. Kaufmann and Hennion 2011.

  24. 24.

    Directive 2014/51/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directives 2003/71/EC and 2009/138/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 in respect of the powers of the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), OJ L 153 of 15 May 2014.

  25. 25.

    Directive 2016/2341 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs) (recast), OJ L 354/37 of 23 December 2016. Cf. also Commission 2009; European Commission 2014a, b.

  26. 26.

    CJCE 25 January 2007, (Robins) C-278/05; CJEU 25 April 2013, (Hogan) C-393/11; Hennion 2013.

References

  • Barbou Des Places S (2015) La cohérence de la libre circulation des personnes à l’épreuve de la mobilité des indigents, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen (RTDE):133

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlier J-Y (2016) La libre circulation des personnes dans l’Union européenne. Journal de droit européen (JDE) 4(228):153

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2009) Report from the Commission on some key aspects concerning Directive 2003/41/EC on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORP Directive), COM/2009/0203 final

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Rosa S (2014) Les principes sociaux de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne sont-ils décoratifs? Recueil Dalloz 2014 (11):705

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014a) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (recast) Brussels, 27 March 2014, COM(2014) 167 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014b) Commission Staff Working Document Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/41/EC on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision, Brussels 27 March 2014, SWD(2014) 102 final

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion S (2013) Crise économique, responsabilité de l’Etat et protection des intérêts des travailleurs en matière de prévoyance professionnelle. La Semaine Juridique Edition Générale (JCPG) (781):1337

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion S (2015) Questions sociales. Annuaire de droit de l’Union européenne (ADUE) 2015:913

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion-Moreau S, Kaufmann O (eds) (2007) Les retraites professionnelles en Europe. Bruylant, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann O, Hennion S (eds) (2011) Steuerung der betrieblichen Altersversorgung in Europa: garantierte Sicherheit? – Governance of Occupational Pensions in Europe: Guaranteed Security ? Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Symon D (2015) Deuxième (ou second et dernier ?) coup d’arrêt à l’adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH: étrange avis 2/13, Europe, 2015, Etude No 2, p 4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université de Rennes1, UMR CNRS IODE 6262, 9 rue Jean Macé, CS 54203, Rennes Cedex, France

    Sylvie Hennion

Authors
  1. Sylvie Hennion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvie Hennion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Sozialrecht und Sozialpolitik, München, Germany

    Eva Maria Hohnerlein

  2. Institut de l’Ouest: Droit et Europe (UMR CNRS 6262), Université de Rennes 1 , Rennes, France

    Sylvie Hennion

  3. Puyrolland, France

    Otto Kaufmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hennion, S. (2018). The Qualification of Beneficiary Rights in Social Protection Systems. In: Hohnerlein, E., Hennion, S., Kaufmann, O. (eds) Erwerbsverlauf und sozialer Schutz in Europa. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56033-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56033-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56032-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56033-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation