Skip to main content

Development of HTR Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modular High-temperature Gas-cooled Reactor Power Plant
  • 1133 Accesses

Abstract

The development of HTR is characterized by the use of coated particle fuel, graphite fuel elements and core structure and helium as coolant. For the fuel elements, different types have been developed: prismatic blocks in the USA, spherical fuel elements in Germany, modified prismatic blocks in Japan, and rod-type elements in Great Britain/OECD. These variants have advantages and disadvantages and some aspects are discussed in this chapter. The main goal in the beginning of the development was to show generally that the concepts with helium cooling are technically feasible and that high helium temperatures can be reached. High efficiency of energy conversion and a good neutron economy and the use of thorium were further points of interest in the first phase of the experimental reactors (UHTREX, AVR, Peach Bottom, DRAGON). In the second phase, the prototypes (THTR 300, Fort St. Vrain) have been built and the main requirement of these plants was to show that large reactor components can be constructed and that reactors with medium power can be operated. Furthermore, the planning and licensing work delivered the basis for further steps in the technology. Based on these experiences, large plants have been planned, which were estimated to be competitive to existing nuclear power plants (HTGR 1160 in USA, HTR 500 in Germany). Parallel to this concept using the steam cycle, the HHT power plant with the Brayton cycle was developed and planned in detail. After the accident in Three Miles Island (1979) and in Chernobyl (1986), the safety of the nuclear reactors became a dominating aspect and the modular HTR was developed with the goal to avoid core melting or overheating to unallowed high temperature and the release of large amounts of radioactive substances generally in case of severe accident. Different variants of this type were planned (as example HTR-Module (200 MWth), and HTR 100 in Germany, MHTR 350 in USA). These plants should be applied in several units on a site to realize large electrical power. Parallel to this, three own development process heat got rising importance. Planning work for the PR 500 and the PNP 500 and similar concepts in USA has been done and is available for future use of these promising technologies. China (HTR 10) and Japan (HTTR) introduced the HTR into their national programs and built their own experimental reactors. Today there is a phase of planning of commercial modular systems (China with the HTR-PM, France with the ANTARES, and other countries with interests in similar concepts). The VHTR was selected as a promising technology in the Generation IV development for future process heat utilization. In this chapter, the concepts mentioned before are explained and the main aspects are indicated. After the steps until now, which have shown that the HTR technology is technically feasible and can be licensed, now an optimization regarding safety, economy, and saving resources will be necessary. The tools and the knowledge to do this work are available. Some further testing of components and systems can help to accelerate the introduction of the technology to the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. N>N British Electricity International, London Modern power station practice. Voe J; Nuclear power generation Pergamon Press; Oxford, New York, Seoul, Tokyo, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoglund, B., UHTREX, Operation near power reactor technology, 9,1,51, 1996 UHTREX, Alive and running with coolant at 2400 °F, Nuclear News, 12, 11,31, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  3. EI Wakil, Nuclear reactor technology, McGraw Hill Company, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schulten, R., The development of high-temperature reactors, Journal of the Franklin Institute, Monograph No. 7, May 1960

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schulten, R., Trauger, D., Gas-cooled reactors, Trans. Amer. Nucl. Society 24, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  6. Special issue, The AVR reactor, Atomwirtschaft, April 1968

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engelhard, J., Final report on the construction and first operation of the AVR nuclear power plant K72-23, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krüger, K., Ivens, G., Kirch, N., Operation experience and safety experiments with the AVR power station, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 109, 1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. AVR experimental high-temperature reactor: 21 years of successful operation for a future technology, VDI-Verlag GmbH, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ziermann, E., Ivens, G., Final report on the operation of the AVR experimental nuclear power plant, JÜL-3448, Oct. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schulten R., The development of high temperature reactor, gas cooled reactors, a symposium sponsored by the Franklin Institute and The American Nuclear Society, Delanmare Valley Section, Monograph 7 Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1960, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Special issue, High-temperature reactors and the Dragon project, the Journal of the British Nuclear Energy Society, Vol. 5, Nr. 1–4, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chapmann, B., Operation and maintenance experience with the Dragon reactor experimental, Proc. ANS Meeting on Gas-Cooled Reactors, HTGR and GCFBR, Gatlinburg, May 1974

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graham, L.W. et al., HTR fuel development and testing in the Dragon project, Proc. ANS Topl. Mtg. Gas-Cooled Reactors, HTGRs and GCFBR, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, May 7-10, 1974, CONF-740501, National Technical Information Service, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rennie, C.A., Achievements of the Dragon project, Ann. Nucl. Energy 5, 1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ashworth, F.P. et al., A summary and evaluation of the achievements of the Dragon project and its contributions to the development of HTR, Dragon Project Report 1000, U.K. Atomic Energy Establishment, Winfrith, Nov. 1978

    Google Scholar 

  17. Capp, P.D., Simon, R.A., Operational experience with the Dragon reactor, experiment of relevance to commercial reactors, Prod. IAEA Int. Mtg. Gas-Cooled Reactors, Jülich, FGR Oct. 1975, CONF-751007, SM-200/19, Vol. 1, International Atomic Energy Agency (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fortescue, P., Nicoll, D., Rickard, C., Rose, D., HTGR underlying principles and design, Nucleonics, 18, J. 8, Jan. 1960

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson S.T., The pebble bed reactor gas cooled reactors, a symposium sponsored by the Franklin Institute and The American Nuclear Society, Delanmare Valley Section, Monograph 7 Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1960, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reference design of 300 MWel-prototype plant, THTR – Thorium High-Temperature Association, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  21. THTR safety report, Vol. 1 and 2, Euratom Report, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  22. Special issue, The 300 MW Thorium high-temperature nuclear power plant THTR, Atomwirtschaft, 5, May 1971

    Google Scholar 

  23. Special issues, Project information: 300 MW THTR nuclear power plant, Hamm-Uentrop, publications of HRB Mannheim, 1975 til 1986

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baust, E., Rautenberg, J., Wohler, J., Results and experience from the commissioning of the THTR 300, Atomkernenergie-Kerntechnik, Vol. 47, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarz, D., THTR operation, the first year, IAEA, Technical Committee Meeting on Gas-Cooled Reactors and their Application, Oct. 1986, Jülich

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schwarz, D., Bäumer, R., THTR operation experience, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 109, 1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bäumer, R., THTR 300 experiences with an innovative technology, Atomwirtschaft, May 1989

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bäumer, R., THTR and 500MW follow up plant, in: AVR Experimental High-temperature Reactor, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, June 1990

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walker, R. E., Johnston, T. A. et al., Fort St. Vrain nuclear power station, Nuclear Engineering International, special issue, Dec. 1969

    Google Scholar 

  30. Special issue, Fort St. Vrain nuclear power station, Nuclear Engineering International, Dec. 1971

    Google Scholar 

  31. Olson, H. G., Swart P.E., Fort St. Vrain high-temperature gas-cooled reactor, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 72, 1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brey, H.L., Graul, A., Operation of the Fort St. Vrain HTGR plant, Proc. American Power Conf., Chicago, Illinois, Apr. 26–26, 1982, Vol. 44, Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brey, H.L., Olson, G.G., Fort St. Vrain experience, Nuclear Energy 22, No. 2, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  34. Williams, R.O., Brey, H.L., Fort St. Vrain update, 9, Internationale Konferenz über den Hochtemperaturreaktor, VGB-TB-113, Oct. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brey, H.L., Fort St. Vrain performance, IAEA TEC DOC 436, Gas-Cooled Reactors, Vienna, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  36. Baxter, A. et al., FSV experience in support of the GT-MHR: reactor physics, fuel performance and graphite, paper presented at the IAEA meeting on gas reactors, Nov. 28-Dec. 2, 1994, Petten, The Netherlands, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schulten, R., Proposal for a 500MWth process steam reactor, Internal Report, KFA Jülich, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kugeler, K., Schulten, R., Process steam generation with high-temperature reactors, JÜL-870-RG, June 1972

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kugeler, K., Process heat from high-temperature reactors, Yearly Report, KFA Jülich, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schulten, R. et al., Industrial nuclear power plant with high-temperature reactor – OTTO principle for the generation of process steam, JÜL-941-RG, April, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schröder, G., et al., Economical aspects of industrial power plants for steam generation with pebble-bed HTR in comparison to oil-fired units, British Nuclear Energy Society, London, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lukaszewicz, J., The behavior of temperatures in a high-temperature reactor after total loss of cooling, JÜL-1112-RG, Oct. 1974

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dibelius, G., Electrical energy and heat from gas turbine processes with high-temperature reactors

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bammert K., A general review of enclosed cycle gas turbines using fossil, nuclear and solar energy, Thiemig Verlag, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  45. Noak, G., Terkessidis, J., Zenker, P., Significance of the helium turbine power plant at Oberhausen (EVO) and the high temperature helium test facility, at Jülich (HHV) for the development of the HTR circuit cycle system (HHT), IAEA-SM-200/26, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  46. Arndt, E., et al., HHT demonstration power plant, ENC 79, Vol. 31, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  47. Special issue, HHT demonstration plant: HHT specific work of planning 1980 til 1981, HHT 40, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  48. Special issue, HHT project: result of development and planning of a high-temperature reactor with helium turbine from 1969 til 1982, HHT-43, March 1983

    Google Scholar 

  49. Weisbrodt, I.A., Summary report on technical experiences from high-temperature helium turbo machinery test in Germany, IAEA, Vienna, Nov. 1995

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lidsky, L.M. and Yan, X.L., Modular gas-cooled reactor gas turbine power plant designs, Proceedings of the 2nd JAERI Symposium on HTGR Technologies, Oct. 1992

    Google Scholar 

  51. Baust, G., Schöning, J., Wachholz, W., Status and possibilities of the high-temperature reactor, Atomwirtschaft 1, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kröger, W., Wolters, J., et al., On the accident behavior of the HTR 500, JÜL-Spec. 220, Sept. 1983

    Google Scholar 

  53. Knizia, K., Schwarz, D., The HTR 500 as a next high-temperature reactor, VGB-Draftwerkstechnik, Vol. 3, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wachholz, W., Safety concept of future nuclear power plants HTR 500 and HTR 100, Atomkernenergie-Kerntechnik Vol. 47, No. 3, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schöning, J., Stölzl, D., Wachholz, W., HTR 500 – technical and safety concept, Atomirtschaft, Aug./Sept. 1985

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schöning, J., Wachholz, W., HTR 500 – technology safety and economy, Energie, Jg. 36, Vol. 7, July 1984

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wittchow, G., Bode, K.H., Schrumpf, V., HTR 500 – alternative to the pressurized water reactor, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, Vol. 5, May 1985

    Google Scholar 

  58. Baust, E., Schöning, J., HTR 500: the basic design for commercial HTR power stations, IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Gas-Cooled Reactors and their Applications, Jülich, Oct. 1986

    Google Scholar 

  59. Goodjohn, Large HTGR design status, GA-10017, April 1970

    Google Scholar 

  60. Special issue, Fulton HTGR, Nuclear Engineering International, 19. Aug. 1974

    Google Scholar 

  61. Oehme, H., Comparative HTGR design, Proc. ANS Topl. Mtg. Gas Cooled Reactors, HTGR’s and GCFBR’s Gatlinburg, Tennessee, May 7-10, 1974, CONF-740501, National Technical Information Service, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  62. GASSAR, General Atomic Company standard safety analysis report, GA-A 132000, GA Technologies, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  63. Moor, R. A., et al, HTGR experience, programs and future applications, Nucl. Eng. Des. 72, 153, 1982; Nucl. Eng. Des. 53, 1979; 61, 1980 and 72, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  64. AIPA study, Safety study for HTR concepts applying German site conditions, JÜL-Spez. 136, Dec. 1981

    Google Scholar 

  65. Moore, R.A., HTGR experience, programs and future applications, Nucl. Engin. Design 72, 1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lidsky, L.W., Overview on gas turbine cycles and technology, Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Closed-Cycle Gas-Turbine Modular High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor, Cambridge MA., USA, June 1991

    Google Scholar 

  67. Reutler, H., Lohnert, G., The modular HTR – a new concept for the pebble-bed reactor, Atomwirtschaft, 27, Jan. 1982

    Google Scholar 

  68. Reutler, H., Lohnert, G., Advantages of going modular in HTRs, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 78, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wolters, J., Kröger, W. et al., On the accident behavior of the HTR-Module, a trend analysis, JÜL-Spez. 260, June 1984

    Google Scholar 

  70. Mertens, J. et al., Safety analysis for the accident behavior of the HTR-Module, JÜL-Spez. 335, Nov. 1985

    Google Scholar 

  71. Reutler, H., Plant design and safety concept of the HTR-Module, SMIRT, Small and Medium Sized Reactors, Lausanne, Aug. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  72. Siemens/Interatom, High-temperature reactor power plant, Safety Report, Vol. 1 til 3, Nov. 1988

    Google Scholar 

  73. HTR GmbH, High-temperature reactor – modular power plant feasibility study for Buna AG/Lenna Worke AG, Vol.3, Safety of the plant, Dec. 1990

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kröger, W., Nickel, H., Schulten, R., Safety characteristics of modern high-temperature reactors, Focus on German Designs, Nuclear Safety, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  75. Markfort, D., High-temperature modular nuclear power plant for the electricity and heat market, Energy, Jg. 36, Vol. 7, July 1984

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yasukawa S., et al., The study on the role of very high-temperature reactor and nuclear process heat utilization in future energy system, JAERI-M-86-165, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kitamura N., et al., Present status of initial core fuel fabrication for the HTTR, IAEA-TECDOC, 988, Johannesburg, Dec. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  78. Jojiri N., et al., Characteristics of HTTR, IAEA-TECDOC, 988, Johannesburg, Dec. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  79. Special issue, JAERI, Present Status of the HTGR Research and Development, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  80. Shiozawa, S. et al., The HTGR program in Japan and the HTTR project, IAEA TCM, Petten, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tanaka T., Construction of the HTTR and its testing program, 3rd JAERI Symposium on HTGR Technologies, Oarai, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  82. Shiozawa S., Research and development of HTTR hydrogen production systems in JAERI, Proc. 12th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Oct. 29, Nov. 2, 2000, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  83. Shiozawa S., et al., Research and development of HTTR hydrogen production systems in Japan, Proc. 12th PBNC, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ohashi H., et al., Current status of research and development on system integration technology for connection between HTGR and hydrogen production system at JAERI, OECD/NEA: 3rd Information Exchange Meeting on the Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Oct. 5–7, 2005, Oarai; Japan

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wang Dazhong, Lu Yingyun, Roles and prospect of nuclear power in China’s energy supply strategy, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 218, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  86. INET/Interatom/KFA Jülich, China-German R+D cooperation, HTR test module China, Final Report for the Concept Phase, Sept. 1988

    Google Scholar 

  87. Yuanhui, X., Zhenya, Q., Zongxin, W., Design of the 10 MW high-temperature reactor, IAEA TCM, Petten, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  88. Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Design criteria for the 10 MW high-temperature gas-cooled test reactor, 1993, IAEA TECDOC 899, Vienna, Aug. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  89. Yuanhui, Xu, Yuliang, Sun, The gas-cooled 10 MW high-temperature reactor in Beijing, VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, 11, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  90. Dazhong, Wang, The status and prospect of energy industry and nuclear energy in China, Presentation in FZ-Jülich, June 1999

    Google Scholar 

  91. Special issue, The Chinese high-temperature reactor HTR-10 – the first inherently safe generation IV nuclear power system, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 218, 2002, No. 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  92. Zuoyi Zhang, The next modular HTR plant in China, Presentation in FZ, Jülich, March 2007

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zuoyi Zhang, Yuliang Sun,Economic potential of modular reactor nuclear power plants based on the Chinese HTR-PM project,Nuclear Engineering and Design 237 (2007) 2265–2274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Yuanhui, Xu, Yuliang, Sun, Status of the HTR program in China, IAEA TCM on High-Temperature Gas Reactor Applications and future prospects, EGN Petten, NI, Nov. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  95. Dazhong, Wang, et al., Chinese energy prospect and HTGR, Chinese Journal of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, Dec. 1994

    Google Scholar 

  96. Yuliang Sun, Yuanhui, Xu, Licensing of the HTR-10 test reactor, Workshop on Safety and Licensing Aspects of Modular High-temperature Reactors, Aix en Provence, France, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  97. Silady F.A,., Baxter M., Dunn T.D., Baccaglini G.M., Schwartz A., Module power rating for GT-MHR helium gas turbine power plant, GA-A21764, Paper presented at the International Joint Power Generation Conference, Oct. 3–5, 1994, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  98. Zgliczynski J.B., Silady F.A., Neylan A.J., The gas turbine – modular helium reactor (GT-MHR), high efficiency, cost competitive, nuclear energy for the next century, GA-A21610, Paper presented at the International Topical Meeting on Advanced Reactor Safety, Apr. 17–21, 1994, Pittsburg, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  99. Jones, Jr. J.E., Kasten, P., Overview of US MHTGR base technology development program, IAEA Techn. Com. Meeting, Jülich, Oct. 1986

    Google Scholar 

  100. Silady, A., Millunci, A.C., Killy, Jr. A.V., Cunliffe, J., Safety and licensing of MHTGR, First International Seminar Small and Medium Sized Nuclear Reactors, Aug. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  101. Turner, R.F., Standfield, G.A., Vollmann, R.E., Annular core of modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor, First International Seminar on Small and Medium Sized Nuclear Reactors, Aug. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  102. Simon, J.W.A., Design features of the gas turbine modular helium reactor, 4th Annual Scientific and Technical Conf. of the Nuclear Soc. Nizung, Novogrod, Russia, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  103. Silady, A., Neylan, A.J., Simon, J.W.A., Design status of the gas turbine modular helium reactor (GT-MHR), GA-A21768, GA Project 9866, June, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  104. McDonald C.F., GT-MHR helium gas turbine power conversion system design and development, GA-A21617, Paper presented at the American Power Conference, Apri. 25–27, 1994, Chicago, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  105. Neylan A.J., Shenoy A., Silady F.A., Dunn T.D., GT-MHR design, performance and project, ICAPP presentation, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  106. Nichols D., ESKOM sees a nuclear future in the pebble bed, Nuclear Engineering International 43, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  107. Kemm K., Development of the South African pebble-bed modular reactor system, The Uranium Institute 24th Annual Symposium Sept. 1999, London

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ion, S., Nicholls, D., Matzie, R., Matzner, D., Pebble-bed modular reactor, The first Generation IV Reactor to be constructed; World Nuclear Association, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  109. Matzner, D., Wallace, E., PBMR moves forward, with higher power and horizontal turbine, Modern Power System, Feb. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  110. Matzner, D., Nicholls, D., Kriel, W., Greyvenstein G., Product development path for the PBMR reactor form 400MWth to 600MWth plant, PBMR, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  111. Varley J., Getting the balls rolling, Nuclear Engineering International, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  112. Koster A., Status of the PBMR concept, Presentation in FZ Jülich, March, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  113. Stuart Mclain, Martins J.M., Reactor Handbook, vol IV Engineering Inter science publishers, John Wileytson, 1964 New York, London, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  114. El Wakie M. M. Nuclear Energy Conversion Intext Educational Publishers, College Division, 1971 of Intext, Scranton, San Francisco, Toronto, London

    Google Scholar 

  115. El-wakie, M.M. Nuclear power engineering. Mc graw-Hill Book company, Inc, New York, San Francisco, Toronto, London, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  116. M.M El-wakil, Nuclear Energy Conversion, Publisher: TBS The Book Service Ltd (Intext Educational Publishers); Scranton, San Francisco, Toronto, London, Feb. 1972

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kugeler, K., Technology of nuclear process heat, Habilitation RWTH Aachen, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  118. Special issue on nuclear process heat, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 74, No. 2, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  119. Van Howe, K.R., Brown, J.R., Peach Bottom – initial loading to critically, USAEC-Report GAMD-7351, Oct. 1966

    Google Scholar 

  120. Duffield, R.D., Development of the high-temperature gas-cooled reactor and Peach Bottom high-temperature gas-cooled reactor prototype, J. Brit. Nucl. Energy Soc., 5, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  121. Birley, W.C., Operating experience of the Peach Bottom atomic power station, Proc. ANS Meeting on Gas-Cooled Reactors, HTGR and GCFBR, Gatlinburg, May 1974

    Google Scholar 

  122. Everett, J.L. and Kohler, E., Peach Bottom Unit No. 1, a high-performance helium-cooled nuclear power plant, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 5, 321, 1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Scheffel, W.J., et al., Operating history report for the Peach Bottom HTGR, GA-A 13907, Vol. 1, UC-77, GA Technologies, Aug. 1976

    Google Scholar 

  124. Kröger, W., Underground arrangement of nuclear power plants, Yearly Report of KFA Jülich, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  125. Special issue on nuclear process heat, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 34, Nr. 1, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  126. PNP reference concept of the prototype process heat (PNP): total and power plant project partners (BF, GHT, HRG, KFA, RBW), 1981

    Google Scholar 

  127. Interatom, Nuclear process heat plant with high-temperature reactor for the coal gasification, Technical Report IÖTB 78, KWU/IA, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  128. Special issue on HTR components, Status of development in the field of heat transporting and heat exchanging components, Monographie “Energy Policy in Stak NRW”, Düsseldorf, March 1983

    Google Scholar 

  129. Kugeler, K., Schulten, R., High-temperature reactor technology, Springer Verlag, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  130. Verforndern, K. (edit), Nuclear energy for hydrogen production, Monographic of Research Center Jülich, Vol. 58, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  131. Verfondern, K. (edit), Nuclear energy for hydrogen production non-electric applications of nuclear energy, Micanet, 07/05-D-4, 4x, Dec. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  132. Silady, F. A., Millunci, A.C., Safety aspects of the modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor, Nuclear Safety, Vol. 31, No. 2, Apr./June 1990

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Kugeler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kugeler, K., Zhang, Z. (2019). Development of HTR Technology. In: Modular High-temperature Gas-cooled Reactor Power Plant. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57712-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57712-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57710-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57712-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics