Abstract
The regulatory framework governing the treatment of patients in hospitals is quite complex and differs significantly from other industries insofar as the patient and the hospital have very limited influence over the design or the outcomes of the relationship between them. Through five different cases, the reader will be confronted with the questions whether the patient-hospital relationship can be qualified as a contractual relationship and whether it shows contractual elements, both allowing the parties to influence treatment and hospital stay. Furthermore, the reader will be familiarized with the unique aspects of patient consent, the patient/proxy-payor-provider constellation and bioethical principles that encompass the treatment from patient admission to patient discharge. The case study suggests that, although the CM Approach may not be suitable for steering the entire hospital stay of an individual patient, some of its elements can nevertheless be useful to highlight the possibilities for a compliant and efficient handling of the patient-hospital relationship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
For Germany, cf. [49].
- 3.
For the United States, cf. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, in which the court held that “[…] a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages” [50].
- 4.
[36]: Here, a cancer patient undergoing radiation therapy was not informed about the long-term side effects of treatment, as the physicians claimed that providing such information would cause undue psychological distress to her.
- 5.
In this case, a patient was nearly paralyzed in the course of treatment against back pain but was not informed about this risk by the defendant physician prior to the laminectomy procedure. For more details, please see http://www.lawandbioethics.com/demo/Main/LegalResources/C5/Canterbury.htm.
- 6.
The concept of physician self-incrimination is detailed in §630c II (2) BGB.
- 7.
According to §263 StGB, “[…]maintaining an error by pretending false facts or by distorting or suppressing true facts shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a fine.” Even the attempt is punishable.
- 8.
Examples of negotiable treatment details could of course be the approximate date of when the procedure is to be initiated, optional ancillary hospital services like accommodation or translation services, or—if medically permissible—the question between local anesthesia or full sedation.
- 9.
§13 IV SGB V allows publicly insured patients to seek medical treatment at an accredited institution within the European Economic Area and Switzerland, but limits monetary reimbursement only to the equivalent that would be payable in Germany.
- 10.
For more information, see https://thieme-compliance.de/en/access-to-e-consentpro-software/.
- 11.
Original term: Gespaltener Krankenhausaufnahmevertrag. Within the AVB, a contract draft concerning patients treated by an attending physician is provided (cf. [9], pp. 10–16).
- 12.
Original term: Totaler Krankenhausaufnahmevertrag.
- 13.
cf. [22], pp. 195–199. The patient information disclosure notification is mandated according to §39 Ia (9) SGB V.
- 14.
In the United States, the Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health established the right to refuse treatment in 1990 [44].
- 15.
cf. Article 3—Right to integrity of the person in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
- 16.
The German term ärtzliche Weisungsfreiheit, or ‘physician’s freedom from directive’ is perhaps a more fitting description for the occupational freedom from constraints. The concept is also mirrored in §1 II of the German Federal Medical Practitioner’s Act (Bundesärzteordnung (BÄO)).
- 17.
Essentially, the patient may officially file protest at the association-level ombudsperson, as depicted in Fig. 10.4.
- 18.
According to §1 I (4) FPV, a transfer constitutes a discharge from the sending hospital and an admission by the receiving hospital within 24 h.
- 19.
In many countries, procedural guidelines, such as the Canadian Joint Statement on Resuscitative Intervention exist to determine who should be involved in such a decision.
- 20.
While in Germany a database for patient declarations of intent does exist with the Federal Notary Chamber (Bundesnotarkammer), there are no legal obligations for physicians to consult these (cf. [29], pp. 66–67).
- 21.
For the US Supreme Court Case on such a scenario (see [44]).
- 22.
For a timeline listing of recent euthanasia legalization in various countries, please see https://euthanasia.procon.org/view.timeline.php?timelineID=000022#2000-present.
- 23.
cf. §3 (7) Rahmenvertrag Entlassmanagement.
- 24.
- 25.
Rahmenvertrag über ein Entlassmanagement beim Übergang in die Versorgung nach Krankenhausbehandlung nach §39 Abs. 1a S.9 SGB V, Az. BSA-Ä 1–16.
- 26.
GKV-Spitzenverband (Spitzenverband Bund der Krankenkassen),https://www.gkv-spitzenverband.de/ english/english.jsp.
- 27.
Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV),http://www.kbv.de/html/about_us.php.
References
Barbash, F., & Hawkins, D. (5. September 2017). Utah hospital to police: Stay away from our nurses. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/09/04/utah-hospital-bars-cops-from-contact-with-nurses-after-appalling-arrest/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e965a6003b05. Accessed 29 Sep 2018.
Beppel, A. (2007). Ärztliche Aufklärung in der Rechtssprechung. Die Entwicklung der Rechtssprechung zur ärtzlichen Aufklärung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Göttingen: Universitätsdrucke Göttingen.
Busse, R., Schreyögg, J., & Gericke, C. (2006). Management im Gesundheitswesen. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag.
Childers, C. P., & Maggard-Gibbons, M. (2018). Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surgery, 153(4). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6233.
Connolly, R. (2016). High court: Prisoner’s RIGHT to refuse necessary medical treatment is qualified by his status as a prisoner. Irish legal news. https://www.irishlegal.com/article/high-court-prisoners-right-to-refuse-necessary-medical-treatment-is-qualified-by-his-status-as-a-prisoner. Accessed 5 Sep 2018.
Deloitte. (2018). 2018 Global health care outlook. The evolution of smart health care. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Life-Sciences-Health-Care/gx-lshc-hc-outlook-2018.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2018.
Deutsch, E. (1980). Das therapeutische Privileg des Arztes: Nichtaufklärung zugunsten des Patienten. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift,24(4), 1305–1352.
Deutsche Krankenhaus Gesellschaft. (2017). Erstattung der Aufwandspauschale bei Prüfungen der sachlich-rechnerischen Richtigkeit. MDK/Abrechnung mit Kostenträgern. https://www.dkgev.de/dkg.php/cat/73/aid/24091/title/Erstattung_der_Aufwandspauschale_bei_Pruefungen_der_sachlich-rechnerischen_Richtigkeit. Accessed 9 Sep 2018.
Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft. (2016). General terms and conditions, treatment contracts and optional physician/accommodation-agreement for hospitals. Allgemeine Vertragsbedingungen, Behandlungsverträge und Wahlleistungsvereinbarung für Krankenhäuser. Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Dierstein, N. O. (2013). Weisungsrecht des Klinikarbeitgebers: Eingriffe in den ärztlichen Bereich sind untersagt. Deutsches Ärtzeblatt, 110(41). https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/147559/Weisungsrecht-des-Klinikarbeitgebers-Eingriffe-in-den-aerztlichen-Bereich-sind-untersagt.
DSG Deutsche Seniorenstift Gesellschaft. (2017). Pflegeheim - Kosten und Finanzierung. DSG Deutsche Seniorenstift Gesellschaft. https://deutsche-seniorenstift.de/kosten-und-finanzierung/. Accessed 6 Oct 2018.
Finkelstein, D., Smith, M. K., & Faden, R. (1993). Informed consent and medical ethics. Archives of Ophthalmology,111(3), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090030042034.
Fleßa, S. (2010). Grundzüge der Krankenhausbetriebslehre (2nd ed.). Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
Gerlinger, T. (2012). Die Vergütung von Krankenhausleistungen | bpb. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. http://www.bpb.de/politik/innenpolitik/gesundheitspolitik/72027/verguetung-von-krankenhausleistungen?p=all. Accessed 2 Aug 2018.
Haag, I., & Hauser, A. (2017). AVB zum Behandlungsvertrag über stationäre Krankenhausleistungen. In J. Robbers, A. Wagener (Eds.), Die Krankenhausbehandlung. Praxiskommentar zur Vertragsgestaltung. Verträge zwischen Krankenhaus und Patient (3rd ed., pp. 83–144). Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Haag, I., & Korthus, A. (2017). Anlagen zu allen stationären Behandlungsverträgen. In J. Robbers, & A. Wagener (Eds.), Die Krankenhausbehandlung. Praxiskommentar zur Vertragsgestaltung (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 159–195). Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Heinze, M. (1990). Die Vertragsstrukturen des SGB V. In Fundheft für Öffentliches Recht, 41 (15101), München: C. H. Beck.
Hoppe, J.-D., & Wiesing, U. (2010). Bekanntmachungen: Empfehlungen der Bundesärztekammer und der Zentralen Ethikkommission bei der Bundesärztekammer zum Umgang mit Vorsorgevollmacht und Patientenverfügung in der ärztlichen Praxis. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 107(18).
Jones, C., & Brendel, A. M. (2018). Law enforcement and healthcare: When consent, privacy, and safety collide. Lexology: https://s3.amazonaws.com/documents.lexology.com/18817c01–2d0c-48ba-9358-3a3b57563657.pdf. Accessed 29 Sep 2018.
Konrad, N. (2017). Verweigerung einer Substitutionsbehandlung im Strafvollzug. Recht und Psychiatrie,35, 27–29.
Korthus, A. (2017). Wahlleistungen nebst Anlagen. In J. Robbers, A. Wagener (Eds.), Die Krankenhausbehandlung. Praxiskommentar zur Vertragsgestaltung (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 201–256). Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Kubella, K. (2011). Patientenrechtegesetz. In C. Katzenmeier (Ed.), Kölner Schriften zum Medizinrecht (Vol. 7) Berlin: Springer.
Maksoud, A., Jahningen, D., & Skibinski, C. (1993). Do not resuscitate orders and the cost of death. JAMA Internal Medicine, 153(10), 1249–1253.
Mendelsohn, D. R. (2011). The right to refuse: should prison inmates be allowed to discontinue treatment for incurable, noncommunicable medical conditions? Maryland Law Review, 71(1), 295–321.
Neubauer, G., & Zelle, B. (2000). Finanzierungs- und Vergütungssysteme. In P. Eichhorn, H.-J. Seelos, & J.-M. Graf von der Schulenburg (Eds.), Krankenhausmanagement (pp. 546–557). Munich: Fischer.
Rehborn, M. (2013). Das Patientenrechtegesetz. GesundheitsRecht. Zeitschrift für Arztrecht, Krankenhausrecht, Apotheken- und Arzneimittelrecht, 5/2013 (pp. 257–273). http://www.gesr.de/gesr_2013_05_aufs.pdf.
Rehborn, M. (2017). Krankenhausbehandlungsvertrag. In S. Huster, M. Kaltenborn (Eds.), Krankenhausrecht (2nd ed.). München: Beck.
Schliephorst, I. (2017). Behandlungsvertrag mit Patienten, die belegärztliche Leistungen in Anspruch nehmen. In J. Robbers, A. Wagener (Eds). Die Krankenhausbehandlung. Verträge zwischen Krankenhaus und Patient (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 79–82). Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Schliephorst, I., & Schwarz, K. (2017). Behandlungsvertrag über stationäre Krankenhausleistungen. In J. Robbers, A. Wagener (Eds.), Die Krankenhausbehandlung. Praxiskommentar zur Vertragsgestaltung (3rd ed., pp. 3–78). Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
statista. (2017). Expensive U.S. states for assisted living 2017. The statistics portal. https://www.statista.com/statistics/310434/most-expensive-annual-assisted-living-facility-in-us-by-state/. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Sucker-Sket, K. (2010). Hinter Gittern—Arzneiversorgung im Knast. Wie die Arzneimittelversorgung im Gefängnis und Gefängniskrankenhaus abläuft. Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung, 2/2010. https://www.deutsche-apotheker-zeitung.de/daz-az/2010/daz-2-2010/hinter-gittern-arzneiversorgung-im-knast. Accessed 6 Sep 2018.
Tiemann, S. (1985). Kompetenzkonflikt bei Streit über ärztlichen Kunstfehler - Sozial- oder Zivilrechtsweg? Neue Juristische Wochenschrift,39(2), 2169–2171.
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg. (2005). Hygienerichtlinien bei septischen Eingriffen (Gr IV) nach RKI. Medizinische Fakultät Universität Heidelberg. http://www.medizinische-fakultaet-hd.uni-heidelberg.de/fileadmin/inst_hygiene/med_mikrobiologie/download/MB-SeptischerEingriff.pdf.
Wynia, M. (2004). Invoking therapeutic privilege. AMA Journal of Ethics -Virtual Mentor, 6(2). http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2004/02/msoc1-0402.html.
Xu, T., Park, A., Bai, G., Joo, S., Hutfless, S., Mehta, A., et al. (2017). Variation in emergency department vs internal medicine excess charges in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine,177(8), 1139–1145.
Court Cases
BGH, 16.1.1959, VI ZR 179/57 (German Federal Court of Justice, 1959).
BGH 28.11.1972, VI ZR 133/71, NJW 1973, 556, 558; (German Federal Court of Justice, 1972).
BGH, NJW 1974, 1422 = VersR 1974, 752 (German Federal Court of Justice, 1974).
BGH, 29.06.1976, VI ZR 68/75, BGHZ 67, 48, 56 (German Federal Court of Justice, 1976).
BGH, 13.02.1985, IVb ZR 72/83 (German Federal Court of Justice, 1985).
BGH, 21.4.2011, III ZR 114/10.
BSG, 19.10.1971, RKa 10/70, BSGE 33, 158 (160 f.); 19.11.1985—6 RKa 14/83, BSGE 59, 172 (177).
Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d. 772, 782 D.C. Cir. (United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia May 19, 1972).
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (United States Supreme Court, June 25, 1990).
Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. 641 (New Hampshire Supreme Court, June 4, 1926).
HCA, Inc v. Miller, 36 SW3d 187 (Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.) December 28, 2000.
OLG Celle, 21.02.1994, 17 W 8/94 = NJW 1995, 792 et seq. (Cell Higher Regional Court, 1994).
OLG Hamm, 6.5.2002—3 U 31/01, OLGR 2003, 222 (Hamm Higher Regional Court, 2002).
RGSt 25, 381 (German Imperial Criminal Court, 1894).
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 105 N.E. 92 (New York Court of Appeals, April 14, 1914).
Smith v. Seibly, 72 Wn.2d 16 (Washington State Supreme Court, August 31, 1967).
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251 (United States Supreme Court, May 25, 1891).
Wenner v. Germany, no. 62303/13, § 59, ECHR 2016 (European Court of Human Rights, 2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wittig, F. (2020). The X Virus Case—Leeway for Contractual Steering of Hospital Treatment. In: Schuhmann, R., Eichhorn, B. (eds) Contractual Management. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58482-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58482-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58481-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58482-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)