Skip to main content

A Paradoxical Miracle: The politics of Coalition Government and Social Concertation in Dutch Welfare Reform

  • Chapter
Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat

Abstract

Until the recent slowdown in the world economy, the Dutch economy has prospered uninterruptedly for practically two decades. As sustained economic growth, low inflation and unprecedented job creation concurred without sharp increases in wage dispersion and incomes, the “Dutch model” has become a catch-phrase for progressive European politicians pondering the possibilities of a new model of “third way” capitalism with a human face, sufficiently flexible and robust to face the challenges of intensified international competition, de-industrialisation, changing gender roles in labour markets and households, and ageing populations (Schmid 1996; HemerijckNisser 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aarts L. and Ph. De Jong (eds.), 1996: Curing the Dutch Disease, Aldershot, Avebury. Central Planning Bureau, 1991: `De Werkgelegenheid in de Jaren Tachtig’, werk-document, No. 41, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centraal Plan Bureau, 1997: Macro-economische Verkenningen, Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Planning Bureau, 1998: `Recent Trends in Dutch Labour Productivity’, werkdocument, No. 98, Central Planning Bureau, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, H., 1966: `The Netherlands: Opposition in a Segmented Society’; in: Robert A. Dahl (ed.), Political Opposition in Western Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 188–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B./Hassel A., 1999: `Striking Deals: Concertation in the Reform of Continental European Welfare States’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies ( MPIfG ), Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., 1990: The Three World of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G, 1996: `Welfare States without Work: the Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism; in: Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economies, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G/Gallie D./Hemerijck,, A. and J. Myles, 2001: A new welfare architecture for Europe?, Report submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M./Hemerijck, A. and M. Rhodes, 2000: The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy, Lisbon, Celta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, J., 1999: Country Employment Policy Review: The Netherlands. Report for Symposium on `Social Dialogue and Employment Success’, 2–3 March, Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A., 1995: `Corporatist Immobility in the Netherlands’; in: Crouch, C. and Traxler, F. (eds), Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: what Future?, Ave-bury, Aldershot, 183–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A./van Kersbergen, K., 1999: `Negotiated Policy Change: Towards a Theory of Institutional Learning in Tightly Coupled Welfare States’, in D. Braun and A. Busch (eds): Public Policy and Political Ideas, Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar, 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A., 1997: Social Policy and Economic Performance, Ministry SZW, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A. /Schludi, M., 2000: `Sequences of Policy Failures and Effective Policy Responses’; in: F.W. Scharpf and V.A. Schmidt (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy — From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, Vol. 1, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 125–228.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A./van de Meer, M. and J. Visser, 2000: `Innovation through Co-ordination: Two Decades of Social Pacts in the Netherlands’, in: G. Fajertag and P. Pochet (eds.), Social Pacts in Europe: New Dynamics, ETUI, Brussels, 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A./Unger, B. and J. Visser, 2000: How Small Countries Negotiate Change: Policy Adjustment in Austria, Belgium, and the Netherlands; in: F.W. Scharpf and V.A. Schmidt (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy — From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, Vol. 2, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A.Nisser, J., 1999: The Dutch Model: An Obvious Candidate for the Third Way?, in: Archives Europeennes Sociologie, I, Vol. XL, 102–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A.Nisser, J., 2000: `Change and Immobility in Negotiated Economies: Three Decades of Policy Adjustment in the Netherlands and Belgium, West European Politics, 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck. A./Manow, P., 2001: `The experience of negotiated reforms in the Dutch and German welfare states’; in: Bernhard Ebbinghaus en Philip Manow (eds.), Comparing Welfare Capitalism,Social policy and political economy in Europe, Japan and the USA, Routledge, London/New York, 217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehoel-Gijbers, G./Hoff, S., 2001: Werkdocument 75: Ontwikkelingen in reïntegratie van uitkeringsontvangers, Den Haag, SCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P., 1985: Small States in World Markets, Industrial Policy in Europe, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, K. van, I995: Social Capitalism: A study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State, London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koole, R.A., 1997: Politieke Partijen in Nederland: Ontstaan en Ontwikkeling van Partijen en Partijstelsel, Utrecht: Het Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., 1999: `Vice into Virtue?: Progressive Politics and Welfare Reform in Continental Europe’, in: Politics and Society, 27, no. 2, 239–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart A., 1968: The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democrat in the Netherlands, Berkely, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maties, J., 2001: `De uitvoering van Sociale Zekerheid: een Historisch Overzicht’, Pensioen Magazine, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer van der, M./Benedictus, H. and Visser, J., 1999: `De CAO: van Inhoudelijke naar Procedurele Coördinatie’, Zeggenschap, No. 4, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer van der, M. (ed.), 2000: `The Trade-off between Competitiveness and Employment in Dutch Collective Bargaining’, report to the ILO, MAS, Amsterdam (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • MISSOC, 1997: Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union: Situation on 1 July 1996 and evolution, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • MISSOC, 2000: Social Protection in the EU Member States and the European Economic Area: Situation on 1 January 2000, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, various years: OECD Economic Surveys 1971–2002: Netherlands, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1994: OECD Jobs Study, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, various years: OECD Employment Outlook, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1999a: Employment Outlook, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1999b: Benefit Systems and Work Incentives, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul, 1994: Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul, 1996: `The new politics of the welfare state’, World Politics, 48 (2), 143–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M., 2001: `The Political Economy of Social Pacts: `Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform’, in: P. Pierson P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W., 1988: `The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration’, Public Administration, No. 66, 239–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W., 1997: Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W./Schmidt, V.A., 2000: Welfare and Work in the Open Economy —From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, 2 Volumes, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, G., 1996: The Dutch Employment Miracle? A Comparison of Employment Systems in the Netherlands and Germany, Discussion Paper FS 96–206, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fir Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sociaal Economische Raad (SER), 1992: Convergentie en Overlegeconomie, The Hague: Sociaal-Economische Raad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sociaal-Economische Raad, 1998: Sociaal-Economisch Beleid 1998–2002, report No. 08, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, H.Berkel, R. van, 2000: `Workfare in the Netherlands — young unemployed people and the Jobseeker’s Employment Act’; in: I. Ledemel and H. Trickey, `An offer you can’t refuse’: Workfare in international perspective, Bristol, The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1990a: Sociale Nota 1990, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1990b: Sociale Zekerheid in Nederland, Deventer, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1991: Sociale Nota 1991, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1993: Sociale Nota 1993, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1994: Sociale Nota 1994, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1995: Sociale Nota 1995, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1996: Sociale Nota 1996, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1997: Sociale Nota 1997, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1998: Sociale Nota 1998, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 1999: Sociale Nota 1999, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 2000: Summary of the Social Memorandum and Budget for the Year 2000, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 2001: Sociale Nota 2001, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZW, 2002: Sociale Nota 2002, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, C./van der Veen, R./Trommel, W., 1997: Dilemma’s van Sociale Zekerheid, project evaluatie van het herziene stelsel van sociale zekerheid, The Hague: VUGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen van der, R./Trommel, W., 1999: `Managed Liberalization of the Dutch Welfare State, Governance, 12, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren van den, J.P., 1996: Achter gesloten Deuren? CAO-overleg in de Jaren Negentig, Welboom, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, F./Blaschke, S. and B. Kittel, 2001: National Labour Relations in Internationalized Markets. A Comparitive Study of Institutions, Change and Performance, Oxford, Oxford University Press;

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J./Hemerijck, A., 1997: `A Dutch Miracle’: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J., 1997: Two Cheers for Corporatism, One for the Market: Industrial Relations, Unions, Wages and Labour Markets in the Netherlands, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J., 1999a: `The First Part-time Economy in the World. Does it Work?’, AIASCESAR, research paper, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J., 1999b: `Creating Welfare Reform and Creating Part-Time Employment. The Case of the Netherlands, Manuscript, University of Amsterdam: Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilthagen, T., 1998: ‘Flexicurity: A New Paradigm for Labour Market Policy Reform?’, Discussion Paper FS 1, 98–202, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windmuller, J.P., 1969: Labor relations in the Netherlands, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR), 1990: Een Werkend Perspectief. Arbeidsparticipatie in de Jaren ‘80, reports to the government no. 38, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hemerijck, A. (2003). A Paradoxical Miracle: The politics of Coalition Government and Social Concertation in Dutch Welfare Reform. In: Jochem, S., Siegel, N.A. (eds) Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10526-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10526-8_7

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3613-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-10526-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics