Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Acta Physica Austriaca ((FEWBODY,volume 7/1970))

Abstract

Before starting this series of lectures on duality, I decided to look up the word duality in the dictionary, Here is how Fowler’s Modern English Usage(1) treats duality. The words dual, dualistic, are explained by: “both words are of the learned kind and better avoided when such ordinary words as two, two-fold, double, connected, divided, half and half, ambiguous will do”. In contrast to what appears in the dictionary, duality has turned out to be a fruitful and promising way to view strong interaction. It is only a few years since Dolen, Horn and Schmid(2) have proposed the idea. It is already hard to write a paper about strong interaction physics without using the subject duality.

Lecture given at IX. Internationale Universitätswochen für Kernphysik, Schladming, February 23 — March 7, 1970.

This research has been supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research through the European Office of Aerospace Research, OAR, United States Air Force under Contract F-61052-68-C0070.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. W. Fowler, Modern English Usage, Clarendon Press Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Dolen, D. Horn and C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. 166, 1768 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Jacob, VIII. Internationale Universitätswochen für Kernphysik, P. Urban, Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Horn, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. J. Lipkin, J. D. Jackson, M. Jacob, Proceedings of the 1969 Lund Conference on Elementary Particles.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Harari, Proceedings of the Brookhaven Summer School, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Van Hove, Phys. Letters 24B, 183 (1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Amati, S. Fubini, A. Stanghellini, Nuovo Cimento 26, 896 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Igi and S. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 625 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Logunov, L. D. Soloviev and A. N. Tavkhelodze, Phys. Letters 24 ,181 (1967), and Ref. 2.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ademollo, H. R. Rubinstein, G. Veneziano and M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Letters 27B, 92 (1969) and Phys. Rev. 176, l904 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 689 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kugler, Phys. Rev. l80, 1538 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Kugler, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 570 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. D. B. Collins, R. C. Johnson and E. J. Squires, Phys. Letters 27B, 23 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Harari, Rapporteur Talk, Proceedings of the Vienna Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. R. Rubinstein, A. Schwimmer, G. Veneziano, M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 491 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. We follow the discussion of Ref. 12 and Ref. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. F. Chew and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1078 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. V. A. Alessandrini and E. J. Squires, Phys. Letters 27B, 300 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1395 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. G. O. Freund, Ibid. 20, 235 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F. J. Gilman, H. Harari and Y. Zarmi, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 323 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Harari and Y. Zarmi, Phys. Rev. 187, 2230 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J. V. Allaby et al., Phys. Letters 30B, 500 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. R. J. N. Phillips, These proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Particle Data Group K N Compilation.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Harari, Proceedings of the Liverpool Conference on Electrons and Photons.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Shapira et al., Weizmann Institute preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. W. Atherton et al., fast antiproton group, CERN preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Nicholson et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 603 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. We follow the discussion of reference 12.

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. J. Lipkin, Nucl. Phys. B9, 349 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. C. N. Chiu and J. Finkelstein, Phys. Letters 27B, 576 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 950 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Kugler, Phys. Letters, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. J. Lipkin, Weizmann Institute preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Pinsky, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 677 (1969). C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B13, 644 (1969).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B13, 644 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Mandula, J. Weyers and G. Zweig, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 266 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 562 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. J. L. Rosner, Ibid. 22, 689 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. D. J. Crennel et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 1347 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. M. Gell-Mann and G. Zweig, unpublished. Discussed in Ref. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Schwimmer, Phys. Rev. 184, 1508 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. M.Kugler, Phys. Letters 31B, 372 (l970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. F. J. Gilman, Phys. Letters 29B, 673 (1969)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. K. W. Lai and J. Louie, Paper submitted to the Irvine Conference on Regge Poles.

    Google Scholar 

  49. See ref. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  50. G. Hite, These Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. D. Jackson, Ref. 5 and Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 12 (1970). Further references are quoted in this paper.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. M. Le Bellac, Phys. Letters 25B, 524 (1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. M. Kugler, Ref. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  54. G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cimento 57A, l90 (1968) .

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. A. Schwimmer, Weizmann Institute Thesis (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  56. P. P. Singh et al., Nucl. Phys. 65, 577 (1965). I thank S. S. Hanna for a discussion of his data.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. M. Kugler and M. Milgrom, Nucl. Phys. B13, 294 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. S. Fubini and G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cimento 64A, 811 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. M. Bishari and V. Rittenberg, Weizmann Institute Preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  60. R. Z. Roskies, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 1851 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 205 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. A, Martin, Phys. Letters 29B, 431 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. K. Huang, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 903 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. N. F. Bali et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 900 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. D. Atkinson et al., Phys. Letters 29B, 423 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. C. Lovelace, Proceedings of the ANL Conference on and K Interactions.

    Google Scholar 

  67. K. Kikkawa, B. Sakita and M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. 184, l70l (1969).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  68. G. Frye and L. Susskind, Phys. Letters 31B, 537 (1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. A. Neveu and J. Sherk, Phys. Rev., to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  70. See, however, D. J. Gross et al., Phys. Letters 31B, 592 (1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. C. Lovelace, Review talk at the Irvine Conference on Regge Poles (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  72. N. N. Khuri, Phys. Rev. 185, 1876 (1969).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  73. G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Letters 31B, 138 (1970).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. H. R. Rubinstein, E. J. Squires and M. Chaichian, Phys. Letters 30B, 189 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. C. Lovelace, Phys. Letters 28B, 265 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. M. Ademollo, G. Veneziano and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 83 (1969) .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. P. Landshoff, These proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  78. R. Carlitz and M. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 186 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. See: S. Fenster and K. C. Wali, Phys. Rev., in press. Further references are quoted there.

    Google Scholar 

  80. G. Altarelli and H. R. Rubinstein, Phys. Rev. 178, 2165 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kugler, M. (1970). Duality. In: Urban, P. (eds) Developments in High Energy Physics. Acta Physica Austriaca, vol 7/1970. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5835-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5835-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-5837-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-5835-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics