Skip to main content

Some Aspects of Beetle Pollination in the Evolution of Flowering Plants

  • Chapter
Flowering Plants

Abstract

Pollination by beetles seems to have strongly influenced the evolution of angiosperm flowers. Beetles are a predominant group of potential visitors and pollinators of flowers since earliest times, so cantharophily is apparent within groups of flowering plants of the most diverse evolutionary levels. In the subclass Magnoliidae, cantharophily is a dominant feature of many families, but even in these archaic groups a more open, unspecialized type of beetle pollination and a more specialized one can be distinguished. Specialization here was probably connected with increase in flower size, numerical increase and grouping and flattening of the sexual organs, etc. The strongly protogynous flower attracts beetles through imitative odours, to which the insects are already conditioned in their other activities. Secondary polyandry, such as occurs in the more basic groups of Rosidae, Dilleniidae and Caryophyllidae, is in many cases related to cantharophily and may find its functional explanation in this mode of pollination. This probably somewhat more recent radiation into beetle-pollination might have caused the stamens to increase in number in order to save some of them from the crude visitors. Cantharophily in secondarily polyandrous groups is also frequently connected with the proto-gynous condition of flowers and with odours which act directly on the instincts of the visitors. During these new waves of flower-biological radiation other insects besides beetles must have already been in existence. The pollination of primitive Rosidae, Dilleniidae and Caryophyllidae is therefore much less exclusive compared with the Magnoliidae, viz., beetles and other insects often frequent flowers jointly. Since beetles have continued as the predominant insect group until today, cantharophily can be observed also in advanced groups of angiosperms. In this case, cantharophily is no longer a sign of primitiveness as it is in the Magnoliidae and to some extent probably also in secondarily polyandrous groups, but a relatively recent adaptation into a still existing ecological niche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, H. G., Baker, J., and Opler, P.A., 1973: Stigmatic exudates and pollination. In: Pollination and Dispersal (Brantjes, N. B. M., and Linskens, H. F., eds.), 47–60. Nijmegen: Dept. Bot., Kath. Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, S., 1969: Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology 19, 332–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1940: Wayside trees of Malaya. Vol. 1. Singapore: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumann, E., 1930: Das Blütennektarium von Magnolia und die Futterkörper von Calycanthus. Planta 11, 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delpino, F., 1873: Ulteriori osservazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale. Milano: G. Bernardoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, L., 1916: Käferblumen bei den Ranales und ihre Bedeutung für die Phylogenie der Angiospermen. Ber. deutsch, bot. Ges. 34, 758–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., 1976: Evolutionary significance of chromosomal differentiation patterns in gymnosperms and primitive angiosperms. In: Origin and early evolution of angiosperms (Beck, C. B., ed.), 220–240. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., Krendl, F., Habeler, E., and Sauer, W., 1968: Chromosome numbers and evolution in primitive angiosperms. Taxon 17, 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., 1965: Reflections on the development of pollination systems in African Proteaceae. J. South Afr. Bot. 31, 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., and Pul, L. Van Der, 1971: The principles of pollination ecology. Ed. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, R. E., 1959: Annonaceae. In: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (Engler, A., and Prantl, K., eds.), Ed. 2, 17aII, 1–171. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger, G., 1970: Beiträge zur Biologie von Annonaceen-Blüten. Österr. bot. Z. 118, 237–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger, G., 1974: The structure and function of the primitive angiosperm flower—a discussion. Acta bot. Neerl. 23, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1950a: The pollination of Calycanthics occidentalis. Amer. J. Bot. 37, 294–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1950b: The protection of the ovules in flowering plants. Evolution 4, 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., and Grant, K., 1965: Flower pollination in the Phlox family. New York-London: Columbia Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A. G., 1897: On the fertilisation of Eupomatia laurina R. Br. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 22, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, Ch. B., 1962: Some observations on pollination and compatibility in Magnolia. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 72, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, F., 1914: Zur Ökologie und Reizphysiologie des Andröceums von Cistus salvifolius L. Jahrb. wiss. Bot. 54, 498–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, F., 1956: Die Biologie der Blüte. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, P., 1904–1905: Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. 3. Band, 1. und 2. Teil (Loew, E., ed.). Leipzig: Verlag W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kral, R., 1960: A revision of Asimina and Deeringothamnus (Annonaceae). Brittonia 12, 233–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki, K., 1973: Probleme der Großsystematik der Blütenpflanzen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 85, 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki, K., and Vink, W., 1967: Flavonoid-Muster der Polycarpicae als systematisches Merkmal. II. Untersuchungen an der Gattung Drimys. Bot. Jb. 87, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., 1964: Das zentripetale und zentrifugale Androecium. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 77, 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., 1971: Das Androecium der Dikotylen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 84, 191–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppik, E. E., 1960: Early evolution of flower types. Lloydia 23, 72–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppik, E. E., 1964: Floral evolution in the Ranunculaceae. Iowa State J. Sci. 39, 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppik, E. E., 1970: Evolutionary differentiation of the flower head of the Compositae. II. Ann. Bot. Fennici 7, 325–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervukhina, N. V., 1967: The pollination of the primary angiosperms and the evolution of modes of pollination (Russ.). Bot. Zh. (Moskow) 52, 157–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijl, L. Van Der, 1953: On the flower biology of some plants from Java. Ann. Bogor. 1, 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijl, L. Van Der, 1960: Ecological aspects of flower evolution. I. Phyletic evolution. Evolution 14, 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijl, L. Van Der, 1961: Ecological aspects of flower evolution. II. Zoophilous flower classes. Evolution 15, 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijl, L. Van Der 1969: Evolutionary action of tropical animals on the reproduction of plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsch, O., 1939: Das Bestäubungsleben der Kakteenblüte. Cactaceae, Jahrb. deutsch. Kakteen-Ges., 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porsch, O., 1950: Geschichtliche Lebenswertung der Kastanienblüte. Österr. bot. Z. 97, 269–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., and Arias, J. R., 1975: A study of the floral biology of Victoria amazonica (Poepp.) Sowerby (Nymphaeaceae). Acta Amaz. 5, 109–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, M., and Yeo, P., 1973: The pollination of flowers. Glasgow: W. Collins Sons and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien, L. B., 1974: Floral biology of Magnolia. Amer. J. Bot. 61, 1037–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thien, Heimermann, W. H., and Holman, R. T., 1975: Floral odors and quantitative taxonomy of Magnolia and Liriodendron. Taxon 24, 557–568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uphof, J. C. Th., 1933: Die nordamerikanischen Arten der Gattung Asimina. Mitt. deutsch, dendrol. Ges. 45, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G., 1976: Systematics and phylogeny of the Compositae (Asteraceae). Plant Syst. vol. 125, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wester, P. J., 1910: Pollination experiments with Anonas. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 37, 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, G. A., 1941: Hybrids of the American papaw. J. Hered. 32, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gottsberger, G. (1977). Some Aspects of Beetle Pollination in the Evolution of Flowering Plants. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution / Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen, vol 1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-81434-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7076-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics