Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New Aspects of the Systematica of Asteridae

  • Chapter
Flowering Plants

Abstract

Five main groups can be distinguished in the Asteridae: 1. Gentianales—Rubiales (and Oleales?); 2. Polemoniales (including Solanaceae and Boraginaceae); 3. Scrophulariales—Lamiales; 4. Dipsacales; 5. Campanidales—Asterales. The Loasaceae, Fouquieriaceae, and Columelliaceae have several characteristics of the Asteridae but can scarcely find their place in this group as circumscribed here. Several plants with much reduced flowers have to be included in the Asteridae: Theligonum in the Rubiales; Callitriche, Hippuris and perhaps also Hydrostachys in the Scrophulariales—Lamiales group. For the Scrophulariales—Lamiales and the Dipsacales, affinities with the woody Saxifragales and Cornales are most probable and several genera have been shifted between these groups. The Asterales show remarkable phytochemical agreements with the Araliales. Several authors have proposed a breaking up of the Asteridae but the evidence for this does not seem conclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartling, F. G., 1830: Ordines naturales plantarum eorumque characteres et affinitates. Göttingen: Dieterich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessey, C. E., 1915: The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2, 109–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlmann, F., Burkhardt, T., and Zdero, C., 1973: Naturally Occurring Acetylenes. London-New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, B. A., and Glennie, C. W., 1971: A chemosystematic study of the Caprifoliaceae. Canad. J. Bot. 49, 1799–1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J. L., 1967: The distribution and phylogenetic significance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot. 54, 1069–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolin, R. C., 1959: Floral structure and anatomy in the family Goodeniaceae Dumort. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 84, 242–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constance, L., 1964: Systematic botany, an unending synthesis. Taxon 13, 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. C., 1941: Macrosporogenesis and the development of the seed of Phryma leptostachya. Amer. J. Bot. 28, 755–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correns, C., 1891: Zur Biologie und Anatomie der Salvienblüthe. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 22, 190–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1957: Outline of a new system of families and orders of Dicotyledons. Bull. Jard. Bot. Bruxelles 27, 13–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1968: The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, H., 1975: A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Not. 128, 119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, H., Jensen, S. R., and Nielsen, B. J., 1976: Iridoid compounds in Fouquieriaceae and notes on its possible affinities. Bot. Not. 129, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandy, J. E., 1967: Loasaceae. In: The Genera of Flowering Plants (Angiospermae) (Hutchinson, J.). Dicotyledones 2, 353–362. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danert, S., 1958: Die Verzweigung der Solanaceen im reproduktiven Bereich. Abh. Deutsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Kl. Chem. 1957; Nr. 6, 1–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. L., 1966: Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. New York etc.: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duigan, S. L., 1961: Studies of the pollen grains of plants native to Victoria, Australia. 1: Goodeniaceae (including Brunoniaceae). Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria N. S. 74, 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, A. W., 1875: Blüthendiagramme. Band 1. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emberger, L., 1960: Les végétaux vasculaires. In: Traité de Botanique (Systematique). Tome II. (Chaudefatjd, M. et Emberger, L.). Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1890–1891: Saxifragaceae. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam. (Engler, A., und Prantl, K., Hrsg.) III 2a, 41–93. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1897: Übersicht über die Unterabteilungen, Klassen, Reihen, Unterreihen und Familien der Embryophyta siphonogama. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam. (Engler, A., und Prantl, K., Hrsg.), Nachträge zum II.-IV. Teil, 341–357. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1930: Saxifragaceae. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam. 2. Aufl. 18a, (Engler, A., und Prantl, K., Hrsg.), 74–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., und Diels, L., 1936: Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 11. Aufl. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G., and Metcalfe, C.R., 1963: Affinities of certain genera incertae sedis suggested by pollen morphology and vegetative anatomy. Kew Bull. 17, 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair-brothers, D. E., Mabry, T. J., Scogin, R. L., and Turner, B. L., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: chemotaxonomy. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62, 765–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, K., 1894: Columelliaceae. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam. IV. 3b (Engler, A., und Prantl, K., Hrsg.), 186–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohne, D., und Jensen, U., 1973: Systematik des Pflanzenreichs unter besonderer Berücksichtigung chemischer Merkmale und pflanzlicher Drogen. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka, N., 1972: Taxonomic study of the Caprifoliaceae. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ. Ser. Biol. 6, 15–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. Darnley, 1974: Chemotaxonomy of Flowering Plants. 4 Vol. Montreal-London: McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg, E., 1908: Die systematische Stellung der Gattung Hoplestigma und einiger anderer zweifelhafter Gattungen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 40, Beibl. 93, 76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K., 1882: Grundzüge der Systematik und Speciellen Pflanzenmorphologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govil, C. M., 1970: Convolvulaceae. In: Symposium on Comparative Embryology of Angiosperms. Bull. Indian National Sci. Acad. 41, 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, K. A., and Grant, V., 1964: Mechanical isolation of Salvia apiana and Salvia mellifera (Labiatae). Evolution 18, 196–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., and Grant, K. A., 1965: Pollination in the Phlox Family. New York-London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, A., 1950: Families of Dicotyledons. Waltham, Mass.: Chronica Botanica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1912: L’origine et le système phylétique des Angiospermes exposés à l’aide de leur arbre généalogique. Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Nat. ser. III. B. 1, 146–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselberg, G. B. E., 1937: Zur Morphologie des vegetativen Sprosses der Loganiaceen. Symb. Bot. Upsal. 2 (no. 3), 1–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. G., and Tucker, W. G., 1969: Serological assessment of relationships in a flowering plant family (Solanaceae). In: Chemotaxonomy and Serotaxonomy, Syst. Ass. Special Vol. 2 (Hawkes, J. G., Ed.), 77–88. London-New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R., 1964, 1969, 1973: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Band 3, 5, 6. Basel — Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R., 1971: Chemical patterns and relationship of Umbelliferae. In: The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae (Heywood, V. H., Ed.), 267–277. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H., 1974: Systematics—the Stone of Sisyphus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 6, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, L. J., and Wolfe, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm morphology: vegetative morphology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62, 538–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, F., 1866: Über die Befruchtung der Salvia-Arten mit Hülfe von Insekten. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 4, 451–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, G. R., and Fairbrothers, D. E., 1970a: Serological investigation of the systematic position of the Caprifoliaceae, I. Correspondence with selected Rubiaceae and Cornaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 57, 810–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, G. R., and Fairbrothers, D. E., 1970 b: Phytoserological systematic survey of the Caprifoliaceae. Brittonia 22, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höck, F., 1892: Zur systematischen Stellung von Sambucus. Bot. Centralbl. 51, 233–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H., 1963: Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Rosifloren. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 5, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1926: The Families of Flowering Plants. I. Dicotyledons. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1973: The Families of Flowering Plants. Ed. 3. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihlenfeldt, H.-D., 1967: Über die Abgrenzung und die natürliche Gliederung der Pedaliaceae R. Br. Mitt. Staatsinst. Allg. Bot. Hamburg 12, 43–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inamdar, J. A., and Patel, R. C., 1973: Structure, ontogeny, and classification of trichomes in some Polemoniales. Feddes Repert. 83, 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. R., Nielsen, B. J., and Dahlgren, R., 1975: Iridoid compounds, their occurrence and systematic importance in the angiosperms. Bot. Not. 128, 148–180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, H. O., 1911: Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte von Hippuris vulgaris. Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Upsal., ser. IV. 2, nr. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukes, C., and Lewis, D.H., 1974: Planteose, the major soluble carbohydrate of seeds of Fraxinus excelsior. Phytochemistry 13, 1519–1521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapil, R. N., Rustagi, P. N., and Venkataraman, R., 1969: A contribution to the embryology of Polemoniaceae. Phytomorphology 18, 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapil, R. N., Rustagi, P. N., and Vani, R. S., 1967: Nyctanthes arbortristis L.: embryology and relationships. Phytomorphology 16, 553–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapil, R. N., Rustagi, P. N., and Vijayaraghavan, M. R., 1965: Embryology of Pentaphragma horsfieldii (Miq.) Airy Shaw with a discussion on the systematic position of the genus. Phytomorphology 15, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, P., 1970: The occurrence of iridoid glycosides in the Scrophulariaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 19, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, P., 1974: Iridoid glycosides in the Loasaceae and the taxonomic position of the family. Acta Bot. Neerl. 23, 677–679.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leenhouts, P. W., 1962: Loganiaceae. In: Flora Malesiana I. 6 (2), 293–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg, A. J. M., 1967: Notes on American Loganiaceae II. Revision of Peltanthera Benth. Acta Bot. Neerl. 16, 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., und Winhard, W., 1973: Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Loasaceen-Blüten. Österr. Bot. Ztschr. 122, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A.A., 1938: Anatomical evidence for the Menyanthaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 25, 480–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macior, L. W., 1968: Pollination adaptation in Pedicularis groenlandica. Amer. J. Bot. 55, 927–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macior, L. W., 1970: The pollination ecology of Pedicularis in Colorado. Amer. J. Bot. 57, 716–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari, P., and Kapil, R. N., 1967: Some Indian contributions to the embryology of angiosperms. Phytomorphology 16, 239–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauritzon, J., 1939: Die Bedeutung der embryologischen Forschung für das natürliche System der Pflanzen. Acta Univ. Lund. N. F. Avd. 2. 35. Nr. 15, 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, H. (Hrsg.), 1964: A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 12. Aufl. Band 2. Angiospermen. Berlin-Nikolassee: Gebr. Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merxmüller, H., 1972: Systematic Botany—an unachieved synthesis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 4, 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paliwal, G. S., and Srivastava, L. M., 1969: The cambium of Alseuosmia. Phytomorphology 19, 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R. C., and Inamdar, J. A., 1971: Structure and ontogeny of stomata in some Polemoniales. Ann. Bot. (London) 35, 389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, W. R., 1974: Ovular morphology and the major classification of the dicotyledons. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 68, 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punt, W., and Leenhouts, P. W., 1967: Pollen morphology and taxonomy in the Loganiaceae. Grana Palyn. 7, 469–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, W., und Jäger-Zürn, I., 1966: Zur Kenntnis der Hydrostachyaceae. 1. Teil, Blütenmorphologische und embryologische Untersuchungen an Hydrostachyaceen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer systematischen Stellung. Sitzungsber. Heidelb. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. Jg. 1966, 1. Abh., 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, R. L., 1971: The relationships of the Umbellales. In: The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae (Heywood, V. H., Ed.), 63–91. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnarf, K., 1931: Vergleichende Embryologie der Angiospermen. Berlin: Gebr. Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnarf, K., 1933: Die Bedeutung der embryologischen Forschung für das natürliche System der Pflanzen. Biol. Gen. 9, 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwebin, F. von, 1920: Revisio generis Sambucus. Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 29, 194–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I., und Gottsberger, G., 1975: Über sphingophile Angiospermen Brasiliens. Plant Syst. Evol. 123, 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soó, R., 1961: The present aspect of the evolutionary history of Telomophyta. Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest Sect. Biol. 4, 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soó, R., 1967: Die modernen Systeme der Angiospermen. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 13, 201–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soó, R., 1975: A review of the new classification systems of flowering plants (Angiospermatophyta, Magnoliophytina). Taxon 24, 585–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporne, K. R., 1969: The ovule as an indicator of evolutionary status in angiosperms. New Phytol. 68, 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporne, K. R., 1974: The Morphology of Angiosperms. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, E. F., 1962: Pollination and evolution in Pedicularis (Scrophulariaceae). Aliso 5, 181–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, T. A., 1927: The morphology and taxonomic position of the Adoxaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 47, 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering Plants. Evolution above the Species Level. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. L., Brizicky, G. K., and Eyde, R. H., 1969: Comparative anatomy and relationships of Columelliaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 50, 36–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1959: Die Evolution der Angiospermen. Jena: VEB G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1964: The taxa of the higher plants above the rank of order. Taxon 13, 160–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1966: Sistema i filogenija cvetkovych rastenij (Systema et phylogenia Magnoliophytorum). Moskva-Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1969: Flowering Plants. Origin and Dispersal. City of Washington: Smithsonian Inst. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1973: Evolution und Ausbreitung der Blütenpflanzen. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1968: Synopsis of a putatively phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 6, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W., 1928: Organisation und Gestalt im Bereiche der Blüte. Berlin: J. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W., 1964, 1969: Die Infloreszenzen. Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. 1. Band, 1. Teil. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W., 1964, 1969: Die Infloreszenzen. Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. 2. Band, 1. Teil. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan, M. R., and Malik, U., 1972: Morphology and embryology of Scaevola frutescens K. and affinities of the family Goodeniaceae. Bot. Not. 125, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan, M. R., and Padmanaban, U., 1969: Morphology and embryology of Gentaurium ramosissimum Druce and affinities of the family Gentianaceae. Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 46, 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan, M. R., and Sarveshwari, G. S., 1968: Embryology and systematic position of Morina longifolia Wall. Bot. Not. 121, 383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S., 1954: Blütenbiologische Typen als Elemente der Sippengliederung dargestellt anhand der Flora Südafrikas. Bot. Studien 1. Jena: VEB G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S., 1974: Ölblumen und ölsammelnde Bienen. Tropische und subtropische Pflanzenwelt 7. Akad. Wiss. Lit. (Mainz), Math.-Naturw. Kl. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G., 1959: Die systematische Stellung der Rubiaceae. Ein Beitrag zum System der Sympetalen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 79, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G., 1967: Betrachtungen über die Artenzahlen der Pflanzen und Tiere. Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin N. F. 7, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G., 1975: Blütenreduktion als ein zentrales Problem der Angiospermen-Systematik. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 96, 448–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G., 1976: Systematics and phylogeny of the Compositae (Asteraceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 125, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. W., and Doyle, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62, 664–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warming, E., and Möbius, M., 1929: Handbuch der systematischen Botanik. 4. Aufl. Berlin: Gebr. Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F., 1957a: Morphologische Untersuchungen zur Systematik der Caprifoliaceen. Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz, Abh. Math.-Naturw. Kl. Jg. 1957, Nr. 1, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F., 1957 b: Die Infloreszenzen von Bonplandia Cav. und Polemonium micranthum Benth. und ihre vermittelnde Sonderstellung unter den Blütenständen der Polemoniaceae. Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 34, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F., 1965: Typology of inflorescences. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 59, 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webnham, H. F., 1913: Floral evolution: with particular reference to the sympetalous dicotyledons. New Phytol. Reprint no. 5. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, R. von, 1891: Solanaceae. In: Natürl. Pflanzenfam. IV, 3b (Engler, A., und Pbantl, K., Hrsg.), 4–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, R. von, 1935: Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik. 4. Aufl. Leipzig-Wien: F. Deuticke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, H. L., 1972: Structure and systematics of Phryma leptostachya L. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 88, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, R., 1971: Die systematische Stellung von Theligonum. Österr. Bot. Ztschr. 119, 329–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, T., 1974: A system of Gamopetalae based on the embryology. J. Fac. Sci. Sect. 3. Bot. (Tokyo) 11, 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. J., and Watson, L., 1970: The classification of dicotyledons: a study of the upper levels of the hierarchy. Aust. J. Bot. 18, 387–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Pflanzensystematik, Systematisch-Geobotanisches Institut der Universität, Untere Karspüle 2, D-3400, Göttingen, Federal Republic of Germany

    Prof. Dr. Gerhard Wagenitz

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Gerhard Wagenitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Allgemeine Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Universität Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany

    Klaus Kubitzki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagenitz, G. (1977). New Aspects of the Systematica of Asteridae . In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution / Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen, vol 1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-81434-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7076-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation