Skip to main content

Virtuelle Führung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aktuelle Führungstheorien und -konzepte

Zusammenfassung

Jede Epoche zeichnet sich durch besondere Formen der Führung aus. Dabei ist Führung nicht statisch, sondern unterliegt vielfältigen organisatorisch und gesellschaftlich begründeten Veränderungen. Derzeit zeigen sich diese Veränderungen als Übergänge zu neuen Formen der Führung, deren Neuigkeitswert Malone (2008: x) wie folgt beschreibt: „[…] die Art von Führung, die in diesen neuen Organisationen nötig ist, wird sich von der Führung in Organisationen des 20. Jahrhunderts unterscheiden, wie die Führung im Römischen Reich von der Führung bei Jägern und Sammlern.“ Die neuen Organisationen, die sich vor allem durch den konzentrierten Einsatz moderner Informations- und Kommunikationsmittel bzw. von sozialen Medien (social media) sowie die Arbeit in geografisch und zeitlich verteilten Strukturen auszeichnen, bringen neue Anforderungen an die Führung mit sich, die hier näher betrachtet werden sollen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Albrecht, A./Albrecht-Göpfert, E. (2012): Vertrauen, Verantwortung, Motivation und Kommunikation: Was Führung in virtuellen Strukturen von klassischer Teamarbeit unterscheidet. In: Personalführung 45 (6), 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andressen, P./Konradt, U./Neck, C. P. (2012): The relation between self-leadership and transformational leadership: Competing models and the moderating role of virtuality. In: Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 19 (1), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J./Atwater, L. (2002): Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. In: The Leadership Quarterly 13 (6), 673–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelo, J. (2010): Management 3.0: Leading Agile Developers, Developing Agile Leaders. Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autorenkollektiv (2013): Enterprise 2.0. Social Software im Unternehmen. Leitfaden des Bundesverbandes Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW) e.V. Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./Kahai, S. S. (2003): Adding the „E“ to E-Leadership: How it may impact your leadership. In: Organizational Dynamics 31 (4), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./Kahai, S./Dodge, G. E. (2000): E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In: The Leadership Quarterly 11 (4), 615–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./Walumba, F. O./Weber, T. J. (2009): Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. In: Annual Review of Psychology 60 (1), 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balthazard, P. A./Waldman, D. A./Atwater, L. E. (2008): Leadership and interaction style in face-to-face and virtual teams. In: Weisband, S. (Hg.): Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work. New York, 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balthazard, P. A./Waldman, D. A./Warren, J. E. (2009): Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams. In: The Leadership Quarterly 20 (5), 651–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoff, J./Schadler, T. (2010): Empowered: Unleash Your Employees, Energize Your Customers, and Transform Your Business. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, N./Olson, J./Gergle, D./Olson, G./Wright, Z. (2002): Effects of Four Computer- Mediated Communications Channels on Trust Development. Collaboratory for Research on Electronic Work (CREW) School of Information, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhse, W. (2012): Changing the Mindset: Die Bedeutung des Digital Leadership für die Enterprise 2.0-Strategienentwicklung. In: Lembke, G./Soyez, N. (Hg.): Digitale Medien im Unternehmen: Perspektiven des betrieblichen Einsatzes von neuen Medien. Berlin/ Heidelberg, 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhse, W./Stamer, S. (2008): Die Kunst loszulassen: Enterprise 2.0. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B./Sproull, L./Kiesler, S./Kraut, R. (2008): Community effort in online-groups: Who does the work and why? In: Weisband, S. (Hg.): Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work. New York, 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carte, T. A./Chidambaram, L./Aaron Becker, A. (2006): Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams. In: Group Decision and Negotiation 15 (4), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F./Shurygailo, S. (2003): E-Leadership and virtual teams. In: Organizational Dynamics 31 (4), 362–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caulat, G. (2006): Virtual Leadership. In: The Ashridge Journal 3, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulat, G. (2012): Virtual Leadership: Learning to Lead Differently. Faringdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordery, J./Soo, C./Kirkman, B./Rosen, B./Mathieu, J. (2009): Leading parallel global virtual teams: Lessons from Alcoa. In: Organizational Dynamics 38 (3), 204–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, C. B./Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013): Swift trust in global virtual teams trusting beliefs and normative actions. In: Journal of Personnel Psychology 2 (1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L./Lengel, R. H. (1986): Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. In: Management Science 32 (5), 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, W. H./Malone, M. S. (1992): The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deiser, R./Newton, S. (2013): Six social-media skills every leader needs. http://www.mckinseyquarterly. com/Six_social-media_skills_every_leader_needs_3056 (10.03.2013).

  • Dennis, D. J./Meola, D./Hall, M. J. (2013): Effective leadership in a virtual workforce. In: Training + Development 67 (2), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRosa, D./Lepsinger, R. (2010): Virtual Team Success. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumm, H. J. (1998): Virtualität in Organisation und Personalmanagement. In: Zeitschrift für Führung und Organisation 67 (4), 196–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L./Robey, D. (2009): Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. In: Info Systems Journal 19 (1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberg, T. (2007): Distance Leadership. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, O./Manstead, A. S. R. (2004): Computer-mediated leadership: Deficits, hypercharisma, and the hidden power of social identity. In: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 18 (3), 306–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran, R. S./Joshi, A. (2012): Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (6), 1252–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallenkamp, J./Picot, A./Welpe, I./Drescher, M. (2010): Die Dynamik von Führung, Vertrauen und Konflikt in virtuellen Teams. In: Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung 41 (4), 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990): The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, T. D./Veiga, J. F. (2008): The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. In: The Leadership Quarterly 19 (1), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gressick, J./Derry, S. J. (2010): Distributed leadership in online groups. In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL) 5 (2), 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambley, L./O’Neil, T./Kline, T. (2007): Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103 (1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1995): Trust and the virtual organization. In: Harvard Business Review 63 (3), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann, S./Lang, R./Steger, T. (2012). Individuen und Kollektive in Organisationen in Zeiten des Web 2.0. In: Armutat, S./Seisreiner, A. (Hg.): Differentielles Management. Individualisierung und Organisation in systemischer Kongruenz. Wiesbaden, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, D./Hüneke, K./Rohrberg, A. (2012): Führung auf Distanz. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G./Geister, S./Konradt, U. (2005): Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. In: Human Ressource Management Review 15 (1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G./Konradt, U. (2007): Telekooperation und virtuelle Teamarbeit. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G./Konradt, U./Orlikowski, B. (2004): Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 13 (1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G./Konradt, U./Voss, K. (2006): Competencies for virtual teamwork: Development and validation of a web-based selection tool for members of distributed teams. In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 15 (4), 477–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G./Lauer, L. (2012): Führung auf Distanz und E-Leadership: Die Zukunft der Führung, In: Grote, S. (Hg.): Die Zukunft der Führung. Berlin/Heidelberg, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G./Orlikowski, B. (2012): Projektmanagement bei ortsverteilten „virtuellen“ Teams. In: Wastian, M./Braumandl, I./von Rosenstiel, L. (Hg.): Angewandte Psychologie für das Projektmanagement. Heidelberg, 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E./Andressen, P./Konradt, U. (2007): E-Leadership und die Bedeutung verteilter Führung. In: Wirtschaftspsychologie 9 (3), 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M./Neufeld, D. J./Avolio, B. J. (2005): Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. In: The Leadership Quarterly 16 (2), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, C. L. (2013): Leadership within virtual context. In: Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (Hg.): The Social Net: Understanding Our Online Behavior. Oxford, 180–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, C. L./Blascovich, J. (2003): Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. In: Small Group Research 34 (6), 678–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, D. (2010): Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. In: Human Communication Research 36 (4), 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker, P. L./Hunsaker, J. S. (2008): Virtual teams: A leader’s guide. In: Team Performance Management 14 (1/2), 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, W./Pertry, T. (2012): Enterprise 2.0: Herausforderungen für Personal, Organisation und Führung. In: Jäger, W./Petry, T. (Hg.): Enterprise 2.0: Die digitale Revolution der Unternehmenskultur. Köln, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L./Leidner D. E,. (1999): Communication and trust in global virtual teams. In: Organization Science 10 (6), 791–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L./Tanriverdi, H. (2003): Leading virtual knowledge networks. In: Organizational Dynamics 31 (4), 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T./Gratton, L. (2013): The third wave of virtual work. In: Harvard Business Review 91 (1), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahai, S./Huang, R./Jestice, R. J. (2012): Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. In: Group & Organization Management 37 (6), 716–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayworth, T. R./Leidner, D. E. (2002): Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. In: Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (3), 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, E./Kelloway, E. K. (2012): Context matters: Testing a model of remote leadership. In: Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 19 (4), 437–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L./Rosen, B./Tesluk, P. E./Gibson, C. B. (2004): The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. In: Academy of Management Journal 47 (2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, W. (2011): Formen und Folgen virtueller Interaktion (Collaboration). In: Eggers, B./Ahlers, F./Eichenberg, T. (Hg.): Integrierte Unternehmungsführung. Wiesbaden, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumm, S./Hertel, G. (2013): Knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics (KSAOS) for virtual teamwork. In: Bakker, A./Derks, D. (Hg.): The Psychology of Digital Media and Work. East Sussex, 80–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladkin, D. (2010): Rethinking Leadership: A New Look at Old Leadership Questions. Cheltenham (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehky, M. (2011): Leadership 2.0: Wie Führungskräfte die neuen Herausforderungen im Zeitalter von Smartphone, Burn-out & Co.Managen. Berlin/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. (2010): Open Leadership. Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lojeski, K. S. (2010): Leading the virtual workforce. Hoboke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lojeski, K. S./Reilly, R. R. (2008): Uniting the virtual workforce: Transforming leadership and innovation in the globally integrated enterprise. Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A./Majchrzak, A./Rosen, B. (2007): Leading virtual teams. In: Academy of Management Perspective 21 (1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (2008): Foreword. In: Weisband, S. (Hg.): Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work. New York, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, A. P. (2006): Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. In: Sloan Management Review 47 (3), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, A. P. (2008): Eine Definition von Enterprise 2.0. In: Buhse, W./Stamer, S. (Hg.): Die Kunst loszulassen. Enterprise 2.0. Berlin, 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonagill, G./Doerffer, T. (2011): Leadership and Web 2.0: The Leadership Implications of the Evolving Web. Gütersloh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D./Weick, K./Kramer, R. (1996): Swift trust and temporary groups. In: Kramer, R./Tyler, T. (Hg.): Trust in Organizations. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (2010): Managen. Offenbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel, A. (2012): Interventions for effectively leading in a virtual setting. In: Business Horizons 55 (5), 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R. C. (2008): E-Leadership: Neue Medien in der Personalführung, Bern/Norderstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemiro, J./Beyerlein, M. M./Bradley, L./Beyerlein, S. (2008): The Handbook of High Performance Virtual Teams: A Toolkit for Collaborating Across Boundaries. Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, D./Wan, Z./Fang, Y. (2010): Remote leadership, communication effectiveness and leader performance. In: Group Decision and Negotiation 19 (3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (2012): Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocker, R. J./Huang, H./Benbunan-Fich, R./Hiltz, S. R. (2011): Leadership dynamics in partially distributed teams: An exploratory study of the effects of configuration and distance. In: Group Decision Negotiation 20 (3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005): What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web –20.html (16.05.2013).

  • Pauleen, D. J. (2003): An Inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members. In: Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (3), 227–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvanova, R. K./Bono, J. E. (2009): Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. In: The Leadership Quarterly 20 (3), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remdisch, S./Utsch, A. (2006): Führen auf Distanz: Neue Herausforderungen für Organisation und Management. In: Organisationsentwicklung 25 (3), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regenbogen, A./Meyer, U. (2005): Handbuch philosophischer Begriffe. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherm, E./Süß, S. (2000): Personalführung in virtuellen Unternehmen: Eine Analyse diskutierter Instrumente und Substitute der Führung. In: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 14 (1), 79‐104.\

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. (1994): Die virtuelle Organisation als Strukturkonzept für die Zukunft? Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 30, Lehrstuhl für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Universität des Saarlandes. Saarbrücken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. (1996): Virtuelle Organisation: Konzeption und Realisation. In: Zeitschrift für Führung und Organisation 65 (4), 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. (2012): Organisation. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütt, P. (2013): Der Weg zum Social Business: Mit Social Media Methoden erfolgreicher werden. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, M./Bakhshalian, E./Hillman, L. (2013): Social Media and Employee Voice: The Current Landscape. http://www.silvermanresearch.com/home/wp-content/ uploads/2013/04/Social-media-and-employee-voice-the-current-landscape.pdf (02.05.2013).

  • Sonntag, R. (2012): Social Business, Social Collaboration und Social Venture. Whitepaper (unveröff.), Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosik, J. J./Avolio, B. J./Kahai, S. S. (1997): Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L./Kiesler, S. (1986): Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. In: Management Science 32 (11), 1492–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stopfer, J. M./Gosling, S. D. (2013): Online social networks in the work context. In: Derks, D./Bakker, A. B. (Hg.): The Psychology of Digital Media at Work. Hove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudweeks, F./Simoff, S. J. (2005): Leading conversations: Communication behaviors of emergent leaders in virtual teams. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyran, K. L./Tyran, C. K./Shepherd, M. (2003): Exploring emerging leadership in virtual teams. In: Gibson, C. B./Cohen, S. G. (Hg.): Virtual Teams that Work. San Francisco, 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M./Marion, R./McKelvey, B. (2007): Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. In: The Leadership Quarterly 18 (4), 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassenaar, C./Pearce, C. L./Hoch, J. E./Wegge, J. (2010): Shared leadership meets virtual teams: A match made in cyberspace. In: Leadership in the Digital Enterprise: Issues and Challenges. Hershey, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibler, J. (2012): Personalführung. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. (2008): Kontrolle als Risiko. In: Buhse, W./Stamer, S. (Hg.): Die Kunst loszulassen: Enterprise 2.0. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisband, S. P. (1992): Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53 (3), 352–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisband, S. P. (2008): Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work. New York/Oxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, T./Moss, S. (2009): Transformational leadership in distributed work groups: The moderating role of follower regulatory focus and goal orientation. In: Communication Research 36 (6), 810–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittchen, M./Kleinlein, N./Hertel, G. (2011): Zielvereinbarungen und Kommunikationsmanagement als komplementäre Führungsstrategien in virtuellen Teams. In: Wirtschaftspsychologie 13 (3), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y./Alavi, M. (2004): Emergent leadership in virtual teams: What do emergent leaders do? In: Information and Organization 14 (1), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J./Bader, P. (2003): E-Leadership and the challenges of leading E-Teams: Minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. In: Organizational Dynamics 31 (4), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigurs, I. (2003): Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? In: Organizational Dynamics 31 (4), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, P./Wit, A./Gill, R. (2008): The relative importance of leadership behaviours in virtual and face-to-face communication settings. In: Leadership 4 (3), 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainhart Lang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lang, R., Rybnikova, I., Wald, P. (2014). Virtuelle Führung. In: Aktuelle Führungstheorien und -konzepte. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3729-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3729-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-3104-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-3729-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics