Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Verteilte und geteilte Führung: Alle machen mit?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aktuelle Führungstheorien und -konzepte

Zusammenfassung

Die kooperative Führung mit einer starken Einbeziehung von Mitarbeitern in den Führungsprozess gilt schon seit längerer Zeit als ein wichtiges Konzept von „guter“ Führung, zumindest im deutschsprachigen Raum. Kooperative Führung wie auch die nachfolgenden Ansätze von verteilter Führung (distributed leadership) und geteilter Führung (shared leadership) sowie praxisnahe Anwendungskonzepte im Management, wie etwa Empowerment, werden zunächst auf die Arbeiten von Mary Parker Follet aus den 20er Jahren zurückgeführt (Weibler 2012: 573, Mendenhall/Marsh 2010). Sie beruhen aber auch auf der in den klassischen Verhaltensansätzen schon angelegten Unterscheidung von Führungsstilen mit einem unterschiedlichen Grad der Partizipation von Geführten im Entscheidungsprozess und darüber hinaus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Avolio, B. J./Sivasubramaniam, N./Murry, W. D./Jung, D./Garger, J. W. (2003): Assessing shared leadership. Development and preliminary validation of a team multifactor leadership questionnaire. In: Pearce, C. L./Conger, J. A. (Hg.): Shared Leadership. Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./Walumbwa, F. O./Weber, T. J. (2009): Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. In: Annual Review of Psychology 60 (1), 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F./Slater, P. E. (1969): Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In: Gibb, C. A. (Hg.): Leadership. Harmondsworth, 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L./Neuhaus, R. J. (1977): To Empower People, the Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, K. (1991): Das Konzept Integriertes Management. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R. (2011): Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. In: International Journal of Management Review 13 (3), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, D. G./Seashore, S. E. (1966): Predicting organizational effectiveness with a fourfactor theory of leadership. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 11 (2), 238–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D./Addicott, R./Fitzgerald, L./Ferlie, E./Baeza, J. (2007): Nobody in charge: Distributed change agency in healthcare. In: Human Relations 60 (7), 1065–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. B./Tesluk, P. E./Marrone, J. A. (2007): Shared Leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. In: Academy of Management Journal 50 (5), 1217–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A./Kanungo, R. N. (1988): The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. In: Academy of Management Review 13 (3), 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A./Pearce C. L, (2003): A landscape of opportunities: Future research on shared leadership. In: Pearce, C. L./Conger, C. A. (Hg.): Shared Leadership. Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N. S./DeChurch, L. A./Carson, J./Carter, D. A./Keegan, B. (2012): The topology of collective leadership. In: The Leadership Quarterly 23 (6), 993–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crevani L./Lindgren, M./Packendorff, J. (2007): Shared leadership: A post-heroic perspective on leadership as a collective construction. In: International Journal of Leadership Studies 3 (1), 40–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G./Lockett, A./Suhomlinova, O. (2009): The institutionalization of Distributed Leadership: A ‘Catch –22’ in English public services. In: Human Relations 62 (11), 1735–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D./Gronn, P./Salas, E. (2004): Leadership capacity in teams. In: The Leadership Quarterly 15 (6), 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V./Gronn, P./Salas, E. (2006): Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era. In: The Leadership Quarterly 17(3), 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1954): The Practice of Management. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D./Hmieleski, K. M./Pearce, C. L. (2006): The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership in Team-Based Organizations. In: The Leadership Quarterly 17 (3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M./Arad, R. (1986): Participative goal-setting: Social, motivational and cognitive factors. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (4), 591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K./Käufer K., (2003): Shared leadership: Paradox and possibility. In: Pearce, C. L./Conger, J. A. (Hg.): Shared Leadership. Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, T. L./Vessey, W. B./Schuelke, M. J./Ruark, G. A./Mumford, M. D. (2009): A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. In: The Leadership Quarterly 20 (6), 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2002): Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. In: The Leadership Quarterly 13 (4), 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2009): Leadership configurations. In: Leadership 5 (3), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, N. J./Day, D. V./Vance, R. J. (2006): Collective enactment of leadership and team effectiveness: A field study. In: The Leadership Quarterly 17 (4), 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J.E./Andreßen, P./Konradt, U. (2007): E-Leadership und die Bedeutung Verteilter Führung. In: Wirtschaftspsychologie 3, 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J.E./Pearce, C. L./Welzel, L. (2010): Is the most effective team leadership shared? The Impact of Shared Leadership, age diversity, and coordination on team performance. In: Journal of Personnel Psychology 9 (3), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991): Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind. London u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1961): Emergent leadership and social influence. In: Petrullo, L./Bass, B. M. (Hg.): Leadership and Interpersonal Behavior. New York, 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J. D./Yoho, S. K. (2005): Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged? In: Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 11 (4), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S./Jermier, J. M. (1978): Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22 (3), 375–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K./Mascall, B./Strauss, T./Sacks, R./Memon, N./Yashkina, A. (2007): Distributed leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. In: Leadership and Policy in Schools 6 (1), 37–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A./Latham, G. P. (1990): A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J./Oduro, G. k. T./Waterhouse, J. (2004): Distributed Leadership in Action: A Study of Current Practice in Schools. Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C. (1991): Developing self-leaders through Super Leadership. In: Supervisory Management 36 (9), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C.C./Pearce, C. L./Mott, J. W./Henson, Z./Sims, H. P. Jr. (2013): Don’t take the lead, share the lead: Surprising leadership lessons from big time college sports. In: Organizational Dynamics 42 (1), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C.C./Sims, H. P. (1980): Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning perspective. In: Academy of Management Review 5 (3), 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C./Sims, H. P. (1987): Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 32 (1), 106–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C./Sims, H. P. (1993): Business without Bosses. New York u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A./Smith, B. R./Dixon, A. L./Robertson, B. (2006): Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership in Team- Based Organizations. In: The Leadership Quarterly 17 (3), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, M. E./Marsh, W. J. (2010): Voices from the past: Mary Parker Follet and Joseph Smith on collaborative leadership. In: Journal of Management Inquiry 19 (4), 284–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K.P. (1983): Self-Management: Its control and relationship to other organizational properties. In: Academy of Management Review 8, 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P./DeRue, D. S./Karam, E. P. (2010): Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. In: Journal of Management 36 (1), 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muethel, M./Hoegl, M. (2010): Cultural and societal influences on shared leadership in globally dispersed teams. In: Journal of International Management 16 (3), 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neck, C. P./Manz, C. C. (2010): Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence. , Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oborn, E./Barrett, M./Dawson, S. (2013): Distributed leadership in policy formulation: A sociomaterial perspective. In: Organization Studies 34 (2), 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce C. L./Conger, J. A. (2003): All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In: Pearce, C. L./Conger, J. A. (Hg.): Shared Leadership. Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L./Manz, C. C./Sims, H. P. (2008): The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice. In: The Leadership Quarterly 19 (3), 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L./Manz, C. C./Sims, H. P. (2009): Is shared leadership the key to team success? In: Organizational Dynamics 38 (3), 234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L./Sims, H. P. (2000): Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. In: Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams 7, 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L./Sims, H. P. (2002): Vertical versus Shared Leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. In: Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 (2), 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M./Pearce, C. L./Sims, H. P. (1999): Empowering selling teams: How Shared Leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. In: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 19 (3), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin, J. (2006): Does action learning promote collaborative leadership? In: Academy of Management Learning & Education 5 (2), 152–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1981): In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. In: American Journal of Community Psychology 9 (1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridder, H.-G./Hoon, Ch. (2006): Führung in Teams. „Geteilte Führung“ als Beitrag zum Führungsprozess. In: Bruch, H./Krummaker, S./Vogel, B. (Hg.): Leadership – Best Practices und Trends. Wiesbaden, 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, E. (1978): Betriebliche Führungsformen. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shondrick, S. J./Dinh, J. E./Lord, R. G. (2010): Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. In: The Leadership Quarterly 21 (6), 959–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1992): The tyranny of a team ideology. In: Organization Studies 13 (4), 611-626. Sivasubramaniam, N./ Murry, W. D./ Avolio, B. J./ Jung, D. I. (2002): A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. In: Group & Organization Management 27 (1), 66–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A./Loeffer, F. J./Frank, G. H. (1953): An analysis of co-therapist interaction in group psychotherapy. In: International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 3, 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B. B. (1976): Black Empowerment: Social Work in Oppressed Communities. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2006): Distributed Leadership. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995): Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. In: Academy of Management Journal 38 (5), 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1996): Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. In: Academy of Management Journal 39 (2), 483–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L./Courtright, S. H./Manz, C. C. (2011): Self-Leadership: A multilevel review. In: Journal of Management 37 (1), 185–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, R./Schmidt, W. H. (1958): How to choose a leadership pattern. In: Harvard Business Review 36, 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W./Velthouse, B. A. (1990): Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. In: Academy of Management Review 15 (4), 666–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H./Yetton, P. W. (1973): Leadership and Decision Making. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldersee, R./Eagleson, G. (2002): Shared leadership in the implementation of re-orientations. In: Leadership & Organization Development Journal 23 (7), 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. D./Wood, S. J./Leach, D. L. (2004): Empowerment and performance. In: Cooper C. L./Robertson, I. T. (Hg.): International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 19, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J./Jeppesen, H.-J./Weber, W. G./Pearce, C. L./Silvia, S. A./Pundt, A./Jonsson, T./Wolf, S./Wassenaar, C. L./Unterrainer, C./Piecha, A. (2010): Promoting work motivation in organizations: Should employee involvement in organizational leadership become a new tool in the organizational psychologists’ kit? In: Journal of Personnel Psychology 9 (4), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibler, J. (2012): Personalführung. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1999): Competing logics and units of analysis in comparative study of economic organization: The comparative-business-system framework in perspective. In: International Studies of Management and Organizations 29 (2), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (1975): Personalwesen als Wissenschaft. In: Personal 27 (8), 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (1993): Führung und Zusammenarbeit: Beiträge zu einer Führungslehre. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (1995): Kooperative Führung. In: Kieser, A./Reber, G./Wunderer, R. (Hg.): Handwörterbuch der Führung, Stuttgart, 1369–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (1996): Führung und Zusammenarbeit. Grundlagen innerorganisatorischer Beziehungsgestaltung. In: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 4, 385–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (2009): Führung und Zusammenarbeit: Eine unternehmerische Führungslehre. Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R./Grunwald, W. (1980): Führungslehre. Band II: Kooperative Führung. Berlin u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2013): Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Rainhart Lang & Dr. Irma Rybnikova

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Rainhart Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Irma Rybnikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainhart Lang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lang, R., Rybnikova, I. (2014). Verteilte und geteilte Führung: Alle machen mit?. In: Aktuelle Führungstheorien und -konzepte. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3729-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3729-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-3104-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-3729-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation