Skip to main content

Release Rate of Biocides from Antifouling Paints

  • Chapter
Ecotoxicology of Antifouling Biocides

In October 2001, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) diplomatic conference adopted the draft convention prepared by the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) of IMO for the “Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships” (IMO-AFS2001). This international convention banned the application of organotin based antifouling paints by 1 January 2003, with a total ban on the presence of organotin by 1 January 2008. The convention was developed to immediately ban the use of organotin compounds such as tributyltin (TBT) and triphenyltin (TPT) globally in antifouling paints to protect the marine environment. The ban on TBT came about because TBT has extensive detrimental effects on non-target marine organisms. IMO-AFS2001 not only banned organotin, but also encouraged development of the alternative tin-free antifouling systems (i.e. environmentally friendly antifouling systems) (IMO 1999; 2001).

Additionally, the ban to use TBT-antifouling paints has resulted in increased research interest in developing alternative tin-free antifouling paints containing biocides that must be effective to control growth of organisms on submerged ship's hull (Vallee-Rehel et al. 1998; The Japan Shipbuilding Research Association 1993; Omae 2003) The environmental fate and aquatic toxicological profile of these tin-free booster biocides in the marine environment have been studied by many researchers (Okamura et al. 2002; Turley et al. 2000; Callow and Willingham 1996; HSE 2005; Harino 2004; Harino et al. 2005; Konstantinou and Albanis 2004). Here, the term ‘booster biocides’ means a group of compounds normally used in addition to copper compounds such as cuprous oxide (Cu2O) and cuprous thiocyanate (CuSCN) in antifouling paint formulations. Moreover, the ideal biocides should have the following characteristics (IMO 1999):

  1. 1.

    Broad spectrum activity

  2. 2.

    Low mammalian toxicity

  3. 3.

    Low seawater solubility

  4. 4.

    Low bioaccumulation in the food chain

  5. 5.

    Not persistent in the environment

  6. 6.

    Compatible with paint raw materials

  7. 7.

    Favourable price/performance

As typical candidates of the tin-free booster biocide, Sea-Nine 211 (DCOIT), Irgarol 1051 (CDMTD), Zineb, Ziram (PZ), Preventol A6 (Diuron), Chlorothalonil, Preventol A4-S (Dichlofluanid), Preventol A5-S (Tolylfluanid), Copper Omadine (CuPT), Zinc Omadine (ZnPT) and PK (pyridine-triphenylborane) have been used widely in the commercial TBT-free antifouling paints and copper-free antifouling paints in recent years (Okamura and Mieno 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atherton D, Verborgt J, Winkeler M A M (1979) New developments in anti-fouling: a review of the present state of the art. J Coat Technol 51: 88–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowner C T, Ferrari G (1989) A new approach to the development and testing of antifouling paints. J Oil Colour Chem Assoc 72: 391–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Callow M E, Willingham G L (1996) Degradation of antifouling biocides. Biofouling 10: 239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEPE Antifouling WG (1999) Utilization of more environmentally friendly antifouling products-EC project No96/559/3040/DEB/E2, http://www.cepe.org/eas/easpdf/0102B2.pdf

  • European Commission (2002) Assessment of Antifouling Agents in Coastal Environments (ACE), http://www.pml.ac.uk/ace

  • Finnie A A (2006) Improved estimates of environmental copper release rates from antifouling products. Biofouling 22: 279–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HSE (2005) Advisory Committee on Pesticides No223, Evaluation on Copper Pyrithione as a New Active Ingredient in Professional Antifouling Products, p.75

    Google Scholar 

  • Harino H (2004) Occurrence and degradation of representative TBT free-antifouling biocides in aquatic environment. Coast Mar Sci 29: 28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Harino H, Mori Y, Yamaguchi Y et al. (2005) Monitoring of antifouling booster biocides in water and sediment from the port of Osaka, Japan. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48: 303–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haslbeck E, Ellor J A (2005) Investigating tests for antifoulants: variation between laboratory and in-situ methods for determining copper release rates from navy-approved coatings. J Protective Coating Linings, August, 34–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter J E (2004) Regulation and registration of anti-fouling coatings in the European Union, in “Proceeding of International Symposium on Antifouling Paint and Marine Environment”, p.11, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (1999) Focus on IMO. Anti-Fouling Systems, IMO London

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2001) Anti-Fouling Systems, International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships, IMO London

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO-15181-1 (2000) Determination of release rate of biocides from antifouling paints – Part 1: general method for extraction of biocides

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/TC35/SC9/WG27 Japan WG (1997) ISO ring test for copper biocide release rate determination, p.1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinou I K, Albanis T A (2004) Worldwide occurrence and effects of antifouling paint booster biocides in the aquatic environment: a review. Environ Int 30: 235–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum B H (1952) “Marine Fouling and Its Prevention”, p.338, US. Naval Institute Press, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Omae I (2003) General aspects of tin-free antifouling paints. Chem Rev 103: 3431–3448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura H, Mieno H (2006) Present status of antifouling systems in Japan: tributyltin substitutes in Japan. “Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Antifouling Paint Biocides.” Vo l 5, Part O, p.201, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamura H, Watanabe T, Aoyama I et al. (2002) Toxicity evaluation of new antifouling compounds using suspension-cultured fish cells. Chemosphere 46: 945–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Series on emission scenario documents No.13, emission scenario document on antifouling products, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/34707347.pdf

  • Samui A B, Hande V R, Deb P C (1997) Synthesis and characterization of copoly(MMA-MA)-Cu complex and study on its leaching behavior. J Coat Technol 69: 67–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman P A, Neumeister J W (1983) In-Situ. Leach Rate Measuring System. US Patent 4375451

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K (1991) Measurement of the leaching rates of tributyltin and triphenyltin compounds from antifouling paint by gas chromatography. J Oil Colour Chem Assoc 74: 331–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K, Ikuta H (1989) Comparison of ASTM/EPA and bubbling methods for the determination of tributyltin leaching rate. J Jpn Soc Colour Mater 62: 466–473 (in Japanese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K, Ohyagi Y (1988) The leaching behaviors of copper and tributyltin from self-polishing type antifouling paints. J Jpn Soc Colour Mater 61: 208–214 (in Japanese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K, Ebara M, Mabuchi K et al. (2002) Determination of leaching rate of sea-nine 211 active ingredient, 4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (RH-287) from antifouling paints by gas chromatography. J Jpn Soc Colour Mater 75: 365–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K, Yoshikawa E, Akiyama M et al. (2005) Determination of release rate of pyridine-triphenyborane (PTPB) from copper-free antifouling paints. J Jpn Soc Colour Mater 72: 50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • The Japan Shipbuilding Research Association. SR-209 meeting (1993) “Technical report of investigation and research for new antifoulants” (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Japan Paint Manufacturers Association (2005) IMO antifouling system registration list, voluntary control in compliance with IMO AFS Convention, http://www.toryo.or.jp/jp/anzen/ imo/index.html

  • Thouvenin M, Peron J J, Charreteur C et al. (2002) A study of the biocide release from antifouling paints. Prog Org Coat 44: 75–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turley P A, Fenn R J, Ritter J C (2000) Pyrithiones as antifoulants, environmental chemistry and preliminary risk assessment. Biofouling 15: 175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1987) “Tributyltin Technical Support Document Position Document 2/3”, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallee-Rehel K, Mariette B, Hoarau P A et al. (1998) A new approach in the development and testing of antifouling paints without organotin derivatives. J Coat Technol 70: 55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valkirs A O, Seligman P F, Haslbeck E et al. (2003) Measurement of copper release rates from antifouling paint under laboratory and in situ conditions: implications for loading estimation to marine water bodies. Mar Pollut Bull 46: 763–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Hattum B, Baart A, Boon J (2006) Emission estimation and chemical fate modeling of anti-foulants. “Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Antifouling Paint Biocides.” Vo l 5, part O, p.101, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Watermam B, Daehne B, Michaelis H et al. (2003) “Performance of biocide free antifouling paints – Trials on deep-sea going vessels” Vo l 1–3, http://www.limnomar.de/conthtml/eng/ mp2–publications–af.htm

  • WHO (1990) “Environmental Health Criteria 116, Tributyltin compounds”, p.40, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (1952) “Marine Fouling and Its Prevention”, p.287, US Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Takahashi, K. (2009). Release Rate of Biocides from Antifouling Paints. In: Arai, T., Harino, H., Ohji, M., Langston, W.J. (eds) Ecotoxicology of Antifouling Biocides. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-85709-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics