Abstract
Cereals are members of grass family and play an important role in providing food security to billions of people across the globe since the beginning of agriculture. Cereal crops differ considerably from each other in terms of morphology, adaptation and genetic architecture. This has motivated researchers across the world to study their evolution, genetics and development. During the last few decades, phenomenal progress in genomics research has paved the way for comparative genomic studies across crop species, especially the cereals due to their economic importance. These studies together have revealed a good level of conservation across cereals both at macro and micro level. However, most of the comparative studies in cereals prior to genome sequencing projects have been performed at genetic map level. Large-scale genome sequencing projects during the beginning of the twenty-first century, especially in rice, sorghum, maize, barley, wheat and foxtail millet, led to better understanding of the conservations of genes/genomic regions at sequence level. This chapter reviews the status of cereal comparative genomics prior to genome sequencing and progress post-genome sequencing of major cereals. The genomic organization of major cereals has been discussed in detail. The chapter also describes the distinguishing features and the mechanism of evolution of cereal genomes. The advancement in genome sequencing technologies, especially the next-generation sequencing technologies and its effectiveness in performing genomic studies across crops, is also discussed. The various genomic tools, databases and resources for performing comparative genomic studies are reviewed here. The chapter presents the opportunities on how the knowledge gained from comparative genomics of cereals can be used for gene discovery programmes, functional genomics and subsequently genetic improvement of cereal crops.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akhunov ED, Goodyear AW, Geng S et al (2003) The organization and rate of evolution of wheat genomes are correlated with recombination rates along chromosome arms. Genome Res 13:753–763
Baillie DL, Rose AM (2000) WABA success: a tool for sequence comparison between large genomes. Genome Res 10:1071–1073
Barry GF (2001) The use of the Monsanto draft rice genome sequence in research. Plant Physiol 125:1164–1165
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (1995) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Ann Bot 76:113–176
Bennetzen JL (2000) Comparative sequence analysis of plant nuclear genomes: microcolinearity and its many exceptions. Plant Cell 12:1021–1029
Bennetzen JL (2007) Patterns in grass genome evolution. Plant Biol 10:176–181
Berkmann PJ, Lai K, Lorenc MT et al (2012) Next-generation sequencing applications for wheat crop improvement. Am J Bot 99(2):365–371
Bowers JE, Abbey C, Anderson S et al (2003) A high-density genetic recombination map of sequence-tagged sites for Sorghum, as a framework for comparative structural and evolutionary genomics of tropical grains and grasses. Genetics 165:367–386
Bowers JE, Arias MA, Asher R et al (2005) Comparative physical mapping links conservation of microsynteny to chromosome structure and recombination in grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:13206–13211
Brenchley R, Spannag M, Pfeifer M et al (2012) Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 491:705–710
Brueggeman R, Rostoks N, Kudrna D et al (2002) The barley stem rust-resistance gene Rpg1 is a novel disease-resistance gene with homology to receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9328–9333
Brunner S, Keller B, Feuillet C (2003) A large rearrangement involving genes and low copy DNA interrupts the microcolinearity between rice and barley at the Rph7 locus. Genetics 164:673–683
Brunner S, Fengler K, Morgante M et al (2005) Evolution of DNA sequence nonhomologies among maize inbreds. Plant Cell 17:343–360
Buell CR (2009) Poaceae genomes: going from unattainable to becoming a model clade for comparative plant genomics. Plant Physiol 149:111–116
Buell CR, Yuan Q, Ouyang S et al (2005) Sequence, annotation, and analysis of synteny between rice chromosome 3 and diverged grass species. Genome Res 15:1284–1291
Campbell MA, Zhu W, Jiang N et al (2007) Identification and characterization of lineage-specific genes within the Poaceae. Plant Physiol 145:1311–1322
Chain P, Kurtz S, Ohlebusch E et al (2003) An applications-focused review of comparative genomics tools: capabilities, limitations and future challenges. Brief Bioinform 4:105–123
Chen M, SanMiguel P, De Oliveira AC et al (1997) Microcollinearity in sh-2 homologous regions of the maize, rice and sorghum genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:3431–3435
Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T et al (2003) Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3497–3500
Collins NC, Thordal-Christensen H, Lipka V et al (2003) SNARE-protein –mediated disease resistance at the plant cell wall. Nature 425:973–977
Conte MG, Gaillard S, Lanau N et al (2008) GreenPhylDB: a database for plant comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 36:991–998
Devos KM, Gale MD (2000) Genome relationships: the grass model in current research. Plant Cell 12:637–646
Duvick J, Fu A, Muppirala U et al (2007) PlantGDB: a resource for comparative plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 36:959–965
Feuillet C, Keller B (1999) High gene density is conserved at syntenic loci of small and large grass genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:8265–8270
Feuillet C, Keller B (2002) Comparative genomics in the grass family: molecular characterization of grass genome structure and evolution. Ann Bot 89:3–10
Gale MD, Devos KM (1998) Comparative genetics in the grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:1971–1974
Gaut BS (2002) Evolutionary dynamics of grass genomes. New Phytol 154:15–28
Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH et al (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296:92–100
Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R et al (2012) Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40:1178–1186
Gottwald S, Stein N, Borner A et al (2004) The gibberellic-acid insensitive dwarfing gene sdw3 of barley is located on chromosome 2HS in a region that shows high colinearity with rice chromosome 7L. Mol Genet Genomics 271:426–436
Griffiths S, Sharp R, Foote TN et al (2006) Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 439:749–752
Gupta PK (2008) Single molecule DNA sequencing technologies for future genomics research. Trends Biotechnol 26:602–611
Guyot R, Yahiaoui N, Feuillet C et al (2004) In silico comparative analysis reveals a mosaic conservation of genes within a novel colinear region in wheat chromosome 1AS and rice chromosome 5S. Funct Integr Genomics 4:47–58
Harlan JR (1971) Agricultural origins: centers and non-centers. Science 174:568–574
Harlan JR (1992) Origins and process of domestication. In: Chapman GP (ed) Grass evolution and domestication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 159–175
Ilic K, SanMiguel PJ, Bennetzen JL (2003) A complex history of rearrangement in an orthologous region of the maize, sorghum, and rice genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12265–12270
Jiang N, Bao ZR, Zhang XY et al (2004) Pack-MULE transposable elements mediate gene evolution in plants. Nature 431:569–573
Kellogg EA (2001) Evolutionary history of the grasses. Plant Physiol 125:1198–1205
Kilian A, Chen J, Han F et al (1997) Towards map-based cloning of the barley stem rust resistance gene Rpg1 and rpg4 using rice as a intergenomic cloning vehicle. Plant Mol Biol 35:187–195
Kim JS, Klein PE, Klein RR et al (2005) Chromosome identification and nomenclature of Sorghum bicolor. Genetics 169:1169–1173
Kirik A, Salomon S, Puchta H (2000) Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J 19:5562–5566
Klein PE, Klein RR, Vrebalov J, Mullet JE (2003) Sequence-based alignment of sorghum chromosome 3 and rice chromosome 1 reveals extensive conservation of gene order and major chromosomal rearrangement. Plant J 34:605–621
Kresovich S, Barbazuk B, Bedell JA et al (2005) Toward sequencing the sorghum genome. A U.S. National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop report[w]. Plant Physiol 138:1898–1902
Kumari K, Muthamilarasan M, Misra G et al (2013) Development of eSSR-markers in Setaria italica and their applicability in studying genetic diversity, cross-transferability and comparative mapping in millet and non-millet species. PLoS One 8(6):e67742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067742
La Rota M, Sorrells ME (2004) Comparative DNA sequence analysis of mapped wheat ESTs reveals the complexity of genome relationships between rice and wheat. Funct Integr Genomics 4:34–46
Lai J, Li Y, Messing J, Dooner HK (2005) Gene movement by helitron transposons contributes to the haplotype variability of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:9068–9073
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP et al (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948
Leroy P, Guilhot N, Sakai H et al (2012) TriAnnot: a versatile and high performance pipeline for the automated annotation of plant genomes. Front Plant Sci 3:5. doi:10.3389/fpls.2012.00005
Ling HQ, Zhao S, Liu D et al (2013) Draft genome of the wheat A genome progenitor Triticum urartu. Nature 496:87–90
Lippman Z, Gendrel AV, Black M et al (2004) Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control. Nature 430:471–476
Liu L, Li Y, Li S et al (2012) Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. doi:10.1155/2012/251364
Lynch M, O’Hely M, Walsh B, Force A (2001) The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. Genetics 159:1789–1804
Lyons E, Freeling M (2008) How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences. Plant J 53:661–673
Lyons E, Pedersen B, Kane J, Freeling M (2008) The value of nonmodel genomes and an example using SynMap within CoGe to dissect the hexaploidy that predates the rosids. Trop Plant Biol 1:181–190
Ma J, SanMiguel P, Lai J et al (2005) DNA rearrangement in orthologous orp regions of the maize, rice and sorghum genomes. Genetics 170:1209–1220
Mace ES, Jordan DR (2010) Location of major effect genes in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.)). Theor Appl Genet 121:1339–1356
Mardis ER (2008) Next generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9:387–402
Matsumoto T, Wu J, Kanamori H et al (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436:793–800
Mayer KFX, Waugh R, Langridge P et al (2012) The International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium. Nature 491:711–716
Merriman B, Ion Torrent R&D Team, Rothberg JM (2012) Progress in Ion Torrent semiconductor chip based sequencing. Electrophoresis 33(23):3397–3417. doi:10.1002/elps.201200424
Monna L, Kitazawa N, Yoshino R et al (2002) Positional cloning of rice semidwarfing gene, sd-1: rice ‘green revolution gene’ encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Res 9:11–17
Moore G, Devos KM, Wang Z, Gale MD (1995) Cereal genome evolution: grasses, line up and form a circle. Curr Biol 5:737–739
Morgenstern B, Frech K, Dress A et al (1998) DIALIGN: finding local similarities by multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 14:290–294
Nelson JC, Wang S, Wu Y et al (2011) Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery by high-throughput sequencing in sorghum. BMC Genomics 12:352–364
Nix DA, Eisen MB (2005) GATA: a graphic alignment tool for comparative sequence analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 6:9
Paterson AH, Lin YR, Li ZK et al (1995) Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269:1714–1718
Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA (2004) Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:9903–9908
Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R et al (2009a) The sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556
Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Feltus FA et al (2009b) Comparative genomics of grasses promises a bountiful harvest. Plant Physiol 149:125–131
Paterson AH, Freeling M, Sasaki T (2010) Grains of knowledge: genomics of model cereals. Genome 15:1643–1650
Peng JR, Richards DE, Hartley NM et al (1999) ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400:256–261
Pereira MG, Lee M (1995) Identification of genomic regions affecting plant height in sorghum and maize. Theor Appl Genet 90:380–388
Piperno DR, Flannery KV (2001) The earliest archaeological maize (Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: new accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:2101–2103
Salse J, Feuillet C (2007) Comparative genomics of cereals. In: Varsheny RK, Tuberosa R (eds) Genomic assisted crop improvement, vol 1, Genomics approaches and platforms. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 177–205
Salse J, Piegu B, Cooke R, Delseny M (2004) New in silico insight into the synteny between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) highlights reshuffling and identifies new duplications in the rice genome. Plant J 38:396–409
Sanger F, Air GM, Barrell BG et al (1977a) Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage phi X174 DNA. Nature 265:687–695
Scherrer B, Isidore E, Klein P et al (2005) Large intraspecific haplotype variability at the Rph7 locus results from rapid and recent divergence in the barley genome. Plant Cell 17:361–374
Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS et al (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326:1112–1115
Shinozuka H, Cogan NOI, Smith KF et al (2010) Fine-scale comparative genetic and physical mapping supports map-based cloning strategies for the self-incompatibility loci of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant Mol Biol 72:343–355
Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D et al (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539
Singh NK, Raghuvanshi S, Srivastava SK et al (2004) Sequence analysis of the long arm of rice chromosome 11 for rice-wheat synteny. Funct Integr Genomics 4:102–117
Siqueira JF Jr, Fouad AF, Rocas IN (2012) Pyrosequencing as a tool for better understanding of human microbiomes. J Oral Microbiol. doi:10.3402/jom.v4i0.10743
Song R, Messing J (2003) Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9055–9060
Srinivas G, Satish K, Murali Mohan S et al (2008) Development of genic-microsatellite markers for sorghum staygreen QTL using a comparative genomic approach with rice. Theor Appl Genet 117:283–296
Swigonova Z, Bennetzen JL, Messing J (2005) Structure and evolution of the r/b chromosomal regions in rice, maize and sorghum. Genetics 169:891–906
Tarchini R, Biddle P, Wineland R et al (2000) The complete sequence of 340 kb of DNA around the rice Adh1- Adh2 region reveals interrupted colinearity with maize chromosome 4. Plant Cell 12:381–391
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F et al (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882
Tian CG, Xiong YQ, Liu TY et al (2005) Evidence for an ancient whole genome duplication event in rice and other cereals. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 32:519–527
Tikhonov AP, SanMiguel PJ, Nakajima Y et al (1999) Colinearity and its exceptions in orthologous adh regions of maize and sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:7409–7414
Varshney RK, Sigmund R, Borner A et al (2005) Interspecific transferability and comparative mapping of barley EST-SSR markers in wheat, rye and rice. Plant Sci 168:195–202
Varshney RK, Nayak SN, May GD et al (2009) Next generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol 27:522–530
Vicient CM, Jaaskelainen MJ, Kalendar R, Schulman AH (2001) Active retrotransposons are common feature of grass genomes. Plant Physiol 125:1283–1292
Vincens P, Badel-Chagnon A, Andre C et al (2002) D-ASSIRC: distributed program for finding sequence similarities in genomes. Bioinformatics 18:446–451
Vitte C, Bennetzen JL (2006) Analysis of retrotransposon diversity uncovers properties and propensities in angiosperm genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:17638–17643
Vogel JP, Garvin DF, Mockler TC et al (2010) Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 463:763–768
Vollbrecht E, Springer PS, Goh L et al (2005) Architecture of floral branch systems in maize and related grasses. Nature 436:1119–1126
Wang J, Roe B, Macmil S et al (2010) Microcollinearity between autopolyploid sugarcane and diploid sorghum genomes. BMC Genomics 11:261
Ware D, Jaiswal P, Ni J et al (2002) Gramene: a resource for comparative grass genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 30:103–105
Wong GKS, Wang J, Tao L et al (2002) Compositional gradients in Gramineae genes. Genome Res 12:851–856
Xie T, Hood L (2003) ACGT-a comparative genomics tool. Bioinformatics 19:1039–1040
Yilmaz A, Nishiyama MY Jr, Fuentes BG et al (2009) GRASSIUS: a platform for comparative regulatory genomics across the grasses. Plant Physiol 149:171–180
Yu J, Hu S, Wang J et al (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 296:79–92
Yu J, Wang J, Lin W et al (2005) The genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications. PLoS Biol 3:e38
Zhang LY, Guo XS, He B et al (2011) Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in sweet and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Genome Biol 12:R114
Zhang G, Liu X, Quan Z et al (2012) Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat Biotechnol 30:549–554
Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the old world, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rakshit, S., Ganapathy, K.N. (2014). Comparative Genomics of Cereal Crops: Status and Future Prospects. In: P.B., K., Bandopadhyay, R., Suravajhala, P. (eds) Agricultural Bioinformatics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1880-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1880-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1879-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1880-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)