Skip to main content

Classifying Italian Pension Funds via GARCH Distance

  • Conference paper
Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Insurance and Finance
  • 1523 Accesses

Abstract

The adoption of pension funds in the Italian social security policy has increased the offer of several investment funds. Workers have to decide what kind of investment to perform, the funds having a different composition and a subsequently different degree of risk. In this paper we propose the use of a distance between GARCH models as a measure of different structure of volatility of some funds, with the purpose of classifying a set of funds. Furthermore we extend the idea of equivalence between ARMA models to the GARCH case to verify the equality of the risk of each couple of funds. An application on thirteen Italian funds and fund indices is performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bader, L. N.: The case against stock in corporate pension funds. Society of Actuaries Newsletter of the Pension Section, 51, 17–19 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bollerslev, T.: Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollerslev, T., Chou, R. Y., Kroner K. R: ARCH modeling in finance: A review of the theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollerslev, T., Woolridge, J. M.: Quasi-maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time-varying Covariances. Econometric Reviews, 11, 143–172 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McClurken: Testing a Moral Hazard Hypothesis in Pension Investment. Washington University, Washington (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Otranto, E.: Classifying the markets volatility with ARMA distance measures. Quadernidi Statistica, 6, 1–19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Otranto, E., Triacca, U.: Testing for Equal Predictability of Stationary ARMA Processes. Journal of Applied Statistics, forthcoming (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Piccolo, D.: A distance measure for classifying ARIMA models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 11, 153–164 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan, R. J., Fabozzi, F. J.: The pension crisis revealed. The Journal of Investing, 12, 43–48 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steece, B., Wood, S.: A test for the equivalence of k ARMA models. Empirical Economics, 10, 1–11 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trudda, A.: Casse di previdenza: Analisi delle dinamiche attuariali. Giappichelli, Torino (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer, Milan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Otranto, E., Trudda, A. (2008). Classifying Italian Pension Funds via GARCH Distance. In: Perna, C., Sibillo, M. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Insurance and Finance. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0704-8_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics